As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
1 day ago
The Howling 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
18 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
The Bone Collector 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
1 day ago
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
 
Death Wish 3 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
1 day ago
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
Jurassic World: 7-Movie Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$99.99
 
Jurassic World: Rebirth 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)
$30.49
 
Spotlight 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
1 day ago
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-01-2004, 08:38 PM   #1
spacev spacev is offline
New Member
 
Sep 2004
Default why Microsofts codec?

I just heard VC-1 will be part of the standard.

Why was it chosen when there are already better codecs on the market?

From my personal test (with MV9) I can say that ON2's VP6.2 already has a much better picture detail and sharpness than Microsofts codec.

Unless VC-1 is much better then the Media 9 codec, I can see no reason why
to use it as a standard.

Does anyone know why VC1 was chosen and why other technically superior codecs lost? Even the open source codec Xvid beats the microsoft codec in quality !
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2004, 11:41 PM   #2
Marwin Marwin is offline
Developer
 
May 2003
10
5
1
Default

They didn't only add Microsoft's VC-1 codec, they also added MPEG-4 AVC High Profile to the BD-ROM specification. Their decision is probably based on a combination of video quality and good licensing terms for the codec(s).

XviD is just an implementation based on the MPEG-4 standard.
On2 is proprietary and probably doesn't have as good licensing terms.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
What codec will be used ? Audio Theory and Discussion Crispy 4 02-01-2010 01:30 AM
paramount testing microsofts download idead? Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology iwanttobeabmoviestar 11 12-14-2007 11:48 AM
Swanni not pulling any punches on Microsofts HD DVD ITV... Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology joeorc 5 09-21-2007 04:35 PM
well what a suprise....microsofts tactics as always... Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology joeorc 2 04-30-2007 05:07 PM
Microsofts' Vista, Blu Ray & HD-DVD Blu-ray PCs, Laptops, Drives, Media and Software Blue 3 12-20-2006 09:24 AM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:13 AM.