|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $27.13 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.57 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $30.50 15 hrs ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $29.99 20 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $54.49 |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Apr 2007
England
|
![]()
Surely that would have been vinyl?
![]() But seriously, betamax had the technological edge but VHS still came out on top. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Expert Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Power Member
Mar 2007
|
![]()
Didn't LaserDisc come out after VHS?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Junior Member
Apr 2007
England
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Power Member
Mar 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
I remember when I was young and in gradeschool when my school bought all these laser disc machines, which we mainly just watched voyage of the mimi on saying that they wanted the best and most up to date technology avalible to us. Man, those were the days thinking that nothing could ever get better than laser disc. No way they could top those massive 18" wide discs (dont really know the width but they seem like they were freakin giant). No way they could make those things any smaller.....
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Active Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Senior Member
Mar 2007
East Molesey, Surrey, UK
|
![]() Quote:
JVC on the other hand developed VHS and let any manufacturer copy the system for free, as long as the VHS logo was stamped on each unit. The manufacturers adopted the cheaper system and Beta died in all but the professional side of the market. Last edited by Filterlab; 04-21-2007 at 07:27 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Senior Member
Mar 2007
East Molesey, Surrey, UK
|
![]()
Not initially though. As VHS took the market hold it was obviously developed by the manufacturers as all products are, but Beta still remained (and remains) the pro's choice.
However, DAT was based on VHS, and that's seriously good quality. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Member
Mar 2007
Middlesex
|
![]() Quote:
Of course, there was also Philips' Video 2000 system, which was released to compete with VHS and Betamax, too. Tapes could be turned over and you could record on the other side. IIRC, you'd get 8 hours out of a single tape in standard play. As for the original question, DVD is recognised as the format which became established most quickly on a worldwide basis. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Expert Member
|
![]()
VCD was very popular in China and places in the southern Hemisphere.
Magnetic Tape was not liked in the more tropical climates. |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Super Moderator
|
![]()
Vinyl by a mile. It has been around the longest. Was the first real physical mass media (as opposed to wireless) is up until Blu-ray arguably the best quality (I don't hold that view, but MANY do). It was also random access unlike tape a great strength of DVD over VHS (or Beta). It has a number of problems, but it gets my vote for the most successful.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|