Behind Enemy Lines: Colombia Discussion

[djluis2k6]

Did anyone else pick this up? I thought it was ok, but I'm not big on military movies, or else I might have found it more interesting.

[Sussudio]

i thought the first had an interesting premise and the last 2 were weak attempts at turning a profit and nothing more. just me.

[khaotika]

Originally Posted by DoYouBlu

i thought the first had an interesting premise and the last 2 were weak attempts at turning a profit and nothing more. just me.

x2

I dismissed it the second I heard it was starring a WWE performer.

[Ator the Invincible]

Originally Posted by khaotika

I dismissed it the second I heard it was starring a WWE performer.

Well that's kind of silly. There's no inherent reason that a movie can't be good just because one of its stars works for WWE. It's just a guy doing an acting job. He'll either be good or bad, no different than any other rookie actor. And besides, I've enjoyed movie performances in the past by guys like Jesse Ventura, Roddy Piper, and Steve Austin (not to mention the Rock). You never know who might be a natural.

Anyway, I'm in no rush to see it. It's a second direct-to-video sequel-in-name-only to a movie that was only "ok" to begin with. That said, I wouldn't avoid watching it if it came up. I enjoy action flicks.