As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Creepshow: Complete Series - Seasons 1-4 (Blu-ray)
$68.47
20 hrs ago
Hard Boiled 4K (Blu-ray)
$49.99
 
Clue 4K (Blu-ray)
$26.59
13 hrs ago
In the Mouth of Madness 4K (Blu-ray)
$36.69
 
Spawn 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.99
 
Shin Godzilla 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.96
 
Casino 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.99
1 day ago
Back to the Future 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
1 day ago
A Nightmare on Elm Street Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$96.99
 
Demon Slayer: Kimetsu No Yaiba Hashira Training Arc (Blu-ray)
$54.45
22 hrs ago
Airport: The Complete Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$86.13
 
Shudder: A Decade of Fearless Horror (Blu-ray)
$80.68
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Entertainment > General Chat


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-25-2007, 03:05 PM   #1
Iron Man Iron Man is offline
Active Member
 
Iron Man's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Default Forrester: Format war is Blu-ray's to lose

In its third annual report on the state of the next-gen format war, Forrester Research reiterated its long-held belief that Blu-ray will ultimately prevail over HD DVD, though more guardedly than in years past.

The market research firm has issued two previous reports on the high-format war, both predicting that Blu-ray would emerge victorious in its fight with HD DVD for next-gen supremacy.

ADVERTISEMENT

This year, on the heels of Paramount's announcement that it would support HD DVD exclusively, Forrester now says that although Blu-ray remains in a better position than its rival, the format's backers will need to change strategy or risk losing their edge.

Specifically, Forrester analyst J.P. Gownder says that if Blu-ray fails to offer a viable hardware model at the $250 price point by Christmas 2007 and doesn't employ more aggressive promotional tactics to counter HD DVD's recent momentum, it could open itself to a possible upset defeat at the hands of HD DVD.

Gownder goes on to say that Blu-ray's failure to land a knock-out blow over the past year means that the format war will continue for at least 18 more months.

Established in 1983, independent research firm Forrester analyzes technology change and its impact on business, consumers, and society.

http://www.highdefdigest.com/news/sh...s_to_Lose/1005
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 03:07 PM   #2
powerSURG powerSURG is offline
Active Member
 
powerSURG's Avatar
 
Jan 2007
Shaw AFB, SC
42
Default

Interesting indeed. Good find.

I hope the BDA is listening and really pushes price cuts for this coming season.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 03:27 PM   #3
WickyWoo WickyWoo is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
May 2007
2
Default

The price point he's wrong on

The PR front he's right on.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 03:30 PM   #4
E-Dogg E-Dogg is offline
Expert Member
 
E-Dogg's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
159
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WickyWoo View Post
The price point he's wrong on

The PR front he's right on.
I agree. I think that if we can get a player like the announced Denon with 2.0 between $400-500 than we would see a lot more sales of stand alone Blu-Ray players.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 03:31 PM   #5
vw mofo vw mofo is offline
Active Member
 
Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WickyWoo View Post
The price point he's wrong on

The PR front he's right on.
I'd have to say I disagree with you... Keep in mind there will be $199 or less HD DVD players by Christmas. Whether they're any good or not is an entirely different story and is irrelevant...

BD NEEDS a sub $300 player and the closer to $200 the better.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 03:37 PM   #6
lch lch is offline
Senior Member
 
lch's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
103
813
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vw mofo View Post
I'd have to say I disagree with you... Keep in mind there will be $199 or less HD DVD players by Christmas. Whether they're any good or not is an entirely different story and is irrelevant...

BD NEEDS a sub $300 player and the closer to $200 the better.
any proof that 199 player is coming ? all you can state is fud from other 'sources'.

and why even when bd player is more expensive, they still selling more than hd player and on the rise still ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 03:39 PM   #7
vw mofo vw mofo is offline
Active Member
 
Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lch View Post
any proof that 199 player is coming ? all you can state is fud from other 'sources'.

and why even when bd player is more expensive, they still selling more than hd player and on the rise still ?
Venturer HD DVD Player to Ship in Time for 2007 Holiday Sales

MSRP on these things IS $199 according Robert at Value Electronics who plans to sell them.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 04:21 PM   #8
Manco Manco is offline
Special Member
 
Manco's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
Tucumcari
Send a message via MSN to Manco
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vw mofo View Post
I'd have to say I disagree with you... Keep in mind there will be $199 or less HD DVD players by Christmas. Whether they're any good or not is an entirely different story and is irrelevant...

BD NEEDS a sub $300 player and the closer to $200 the better.
It does not matter if the HD-DVD player is free. Low pricing of hardware is completely irrelevant and and the cheaper the players get the more it works "against" you. If economically speaking, you can only afford a $199 player you cannot afford a ton of software titles priced at $25-$32 retail. You also cannot afford a HDTV bigger than say 32" 720P where HDM would make any significant difference any way. We have got to get off this focus of hardware pricing. Consumers that can only afford $199 HD-DVD players will stick with DVD simply out of economics. That is why the BDA is playing it smart and not low-balling the price of BR players. What you should be more worried about is the $400 Toshiba that is a TRUE 1080P player. That is the enemy.

Who the hell walks out of BestBuy with a $3000 plasma and then says "oh crap... I've got to go get a cheapo $199 disk player"?

Last edited by Manco; 09-25-2007 at 04:24 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 04:27 PM   #9
bdrex28 bdrex28 is offline
Senior Member
 
bdrex28's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
Edmond, OK
4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manco View Post
It does not matter if the HD-DVD player is free. Low pricing of hardware is completely irrelevant and and the cheaper the players get the more it works "against" you. If economically speaking, you can only afford a $199 player you cannot afford a ton of software titles priced at $25-$32 retail. You also cannot afford a HDTV bigger than say 32" 720P where HDM would make any significant difference any way. We have got to get off this focus of hardware pricing. Consumers that can only afford $199 HD-DVD players will stick with DVD simply out of economics. That is why the BDA is playing it smart and not low-balling the price of BR players. What you should be more worried about is the $400 Toshiba that is a TRUE 1080P player. That is the enemy.

Who the hell walks out of BestBuy with a $3000 plasma and then says "oh crap... I've got to go get a cheapo $199 disk player"?
I completely agree with your post.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 04:30 PM   #10
vw mofo vw mofo is offline
Active Member
 
Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manco View Post
It does not matter if the HD-DVD player is free. Low pricing of hardware is completely irrelevant and and the cheaper the players get the more it works "against" you. If economically speaking, you can only afford a $199 player you cannot afford a ton of software titles priced at $25-$32 retail. You also cannot afford a HDTV bigger than say 32" 720P where HDM would make any significant difference any way. We have got to get off this focus of hardware pricing. Consumers that can only afford $199 HD-DVD players will stick with DVD simply out of economics. That is why the BDA is playing it smart and not low-balling the price of BR players. What you should be more worried about is the $400 Toshiba that is a TRUE 1080P player. That is the enemy.

Who the hell walks out of BestBuy with a $3000 plasma and then says "oh crap... I've got to go get a cheapo $199 disk player"?
I also agree for the most part. However, do not underestimate the power of bargain shoppers! Look what happens on Amazon anytime you can get an A2 for ~$200 with a couple free movies...

There's no reason blu shouldn't cash in on something similar!
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 04:31 PM   #11
w_tanoto w_tanoto is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
w_tanoto's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Hatfield, UK / Jakarta, Indonesia
37
47
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manco View Post
It does not matter if the HD-DVD player is free. Low pricing of hardware is completely irrelevant and and the cheaper the players get the more it works "against" you. If economically speaking, you can only afford a $199 player you cannot afford a ton of software titles priced at $25-$32 retail. You also cannot afford a HDTV bigger than say 32" 720P where HDM would make any significant difference any way. We have got to get off this focus of hardware pricing. Consumers that can only afford $199 HD-DVD players will stick with DVD simply out of economics. That is why the BDA is playing it smart and not low-balling the price of BR players. What you should be more worried about is the $400 Toshiba that is a TRUE 1080P player. That is the enemy.

Who the hell walks out of BestBuy with a $3000 plasma and then says "oh crap... I've got to go get a cheapo $199 disk player"?
well, but people that don't know about it will choose the cheaper player believing that it will play High definition (1080p). Some good trick from HD DVD side.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 04:31 PM   #12
BigB88 BigB88 is offline
Active Member
 
BigB88's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manco View Post
It does not matter if the HD-DVD player is free. Low pricing of hardware is completely irrelevant and and the cheaper the players get the more it works "against" you. If economically speaking, you can only afford a $199 player you cannot afford a ton of software titles priced at $25-$32 retail. You also cannot afford a HDTV bigger than say 32" 720P where HDM would make any significant difference any way. We have got to get off this focus of hardware pricing. Consumers that can only afford $199 HD-DVD players will stick with DVD simply out of economics. That is why the BDA is playing it smart and not low-balling the price of BR players. What you should be more worried about is the $400 Toshiba that is a TRUE 1080P player. That is the enemy.

Who the hell walks out of BestBuy with a $3000 plasma and then says "oh crap... I've got to go get a $199 disk player"?
I don't agree, although I don't think Blu should go below a $325 price point, I do think they need to at least be in the ballpark. I do not think Blu should go with a "under $200" player however. The reasoning behind a lower price point for stand-alone players is that Blu can say, we are priced at $325 or $350 and our player is more advanced then that of the $199 HD-DVD counterpart - just being more price competitive. In addition, people will gravitate to lower priced players simply to save $$ so they can buy other things or more HD titles (Opportunity costs). What the BDA should do is recommend to the Blu manufacturers to offer a lower priced stand-alone player and get Sony to lower the PS3 to a competitive price point with the stand-alones, perhaps $50-$75 more, something like $350 for a Blu Ray stand-alone and $399-$425 for a PS3 will bring in a lot more to the Blu column.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 04:36 PM   #13
CptGreedle CptGreedle is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
CptGreedle's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Sworn super-hero now services Atlanta (and suburbs).
128
5
Send a message via AIM to CptGreedle
Default

I wonder...
I know Toshiba is taking a loss for every HD-DVD player sold, and M$ is taking a loss on every 360 sold, but with the prices of the BD players, i suspect they are not taking a loss for each one sold.
Perhaps it is time for a few of those companies that can afford it, to take a risk and lower the price enough to be close to $200 even if it means taking a loss. Why?
Cause right now, if they players can't compete with the price, there will be more HD-DVD players out there than BD players even if it is in the hands of a moron... it still means they will have more of them.
I also think that this year will NOT mean as much as everyone is making it up to be....
The problem is people are ignorant and poor. What I mean is, those that can afford an HDTV don't even realize they are not watching HD signals or think SD signals are good enough. And more importantly, people who want an HDTV and all that awesomeness that comes with it, can't afford it still!
Yes you can buy a 720p 32" SOny Bravia for $600, BUT people want bigger and better. The real quality TVs have to be cheaper.. right now they are still around $3k. If they can get dropped to UNDER $1k, then people will flock to buy them. That won't happen this year. People want the best product for the lowest price... and I think next year it will happen.
This means 2 things, there are not going to be as many people flocking to get out there and buy HDTVs and BDs and HD-DVDs etc. as people speculate, which means that the sales are not going to be as grand as we hope.
But it also means that if we don't get BD to be the winner of the format war by next year, there will be no winner... ever. There must be one when people are most likely to go out and get one. This year is important cause it sets us up for next year. If we can get the better sales, than it is likely WB and others might support BD exclusively, which means victory. But if it does not happen, then the format war will end in a "draw" and people will find something else to do (i.e. downloads).

We NEED the sales this year to get the support we need for next year. It really comes down to this.. Are we going to have the support and such after this 4Q battle to end the war in time for the 4Q next year?

Last edited by CptGreedle; 09-25-2007 at 04:39 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 04:45 PM   #14
buckshot buckshot is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
buckshot's Avatar
 
Feb 2007
san die ego
2
9
Default

the venturer could sell a million players and dit wouldn't matter. their market is the really cheap or uneducated people. and they will buy it. but they won't buy the discs or they will buy them then return them when the picture isn't any better than their durabrand dvd player on their crt tv or their ''enhanced definition'' plasma.

Last edited by buckshot; 09-25-2007 at 04:54 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 06:13 PM   #15
Coltboy Coltboy is offline
Active Member
 
Coltboy's Avatar
 
Mar 2007
OHIO
72
14
13
Default

[/quote]Who the hell walks out of BestBuy with a $3000 plasma and then says "oh crap... I've got to go get a cheapo $199 disk player"?[/QUOTE]


lol i agree by the time you spend that much.........what the hell is it to spend another $400+ for a HD player

Last edited by Coltboy; 09-25-2007 at 06:21 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 06:29 PM   #16
brian lawson brian lawson is offline
Banned
 
Sep 2007
colorado springs
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manco View Post
It does not matter if the HD-DVD player is free. Low pricing of hardware is completely irrelevant and and the cheaper the players get the more it works "against" you. If economically speaking, you can only afford a $199 player you cannot afford a ton of software titles priced at $25-$32 retail. You also cannot afford a HDTV bigger than say 32" 720P where HDM would make any significant difference any way. We have got to get off this focus of hardware pricing. Consumers that can only afford $199 HD-DVD players will stick with DVD simply out of economics. That is why the BDA is playing it smart and not low-balling the price of BR players. What you should be more worried about is the $400 Toshiba that is a TRUE 1080P player. That is the enemy.

Who the hell walks out of BestBuy with a $3000 plasma and then says "oh crap... I've got to go get a cheapo $199 disk player"?
I completely disagree with this. For the same reason that you'll see a fat ass order a double-whopper with extra mayonnaise and a DIET coke. The same reason you see poor people living in a sht hole while driving around in an expensive car. Come on, you think everyone is rational about their purchases?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 08:41 PM   #17
bryaaaant bryaaaant is offline
Active Member
 
Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manco View Post
Who the hell walks out of BestBuy with a $3000 plasma and then says "oh crap... I've got to go get a cheapo $199 disk player"?
You don't have to worry about the $3,000 plasma guy at all. The one you have to worry about are all the $800 Vizio guys and if I'm not mistaken, they're one of the best-selling HDTV brands in the U.S. all because of the price point.

But I guess the real question is who the hell walks out of WalMart with a cheapo TV is willing to dish out $30 on a movie when he can get the same movie on dvd for $15.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 04:31 PM   #18
dialog_gvf dialog_gvf is offline
Moderator
 
dialog_gvf's Avatar
 
Nov 2006
Toronto
320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vw mofo View Post
I'd have to say I disagree with you... Keep in mind there will be $199 or less HD DVD players by Christmas. Whether they're any good or not is an entirely different story and is irrelevant...

BD NEEDS a sub $300 player and the closer to $200 the better.
Why? HD DVD has been less than $250 for months and has fallen behind BD stand-alone sales. How does driving a bunch of people who are only willing to spend $250 on a player get $20-$40 discs sold?!

Bottom line, anyone so price sensitive that $250 is a sale when $400 is not, will not be a factor in disc sales.

Gary
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 04:37 PM   #19
vw mofo vw mofo is offline
Active Member
 
Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dialog_gvf View Post
Why? HD DVD has been less than $250 for months and has fallen behind BD stand-alone sales. How does driving a bunch of people who are only willing to spend $250 on a player get $20-$40 discs sold?!

Bottom line, anyone so price sensitive that $250 is a sale when $400 is not, will not be a factor in disc sales.

Gary
Do you have any sales data to back up that BD players are still outselling HD DVD players? I'd be very interested to see if it was still the case.

Maybe to you $150 isn't a big difference, but for me and many other people it's HUGE. Especially when you have a cheap-ass wife at home! lol
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 05:56 PM   #20
gvortex7 gvortex7 is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
gvortex7's Avatar
 
Jan 2007
Fort Lauderdale, FL
18
105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vw mofo View Post
I'd have to say I disagree with you... Keep in mind there will be $199 or less HD DVD players by Christmas. Whether they're any good or not is an entirely different story and is irrelevant...

BD NEEDS a sub $300 player and the closer to $200 the better.
Ahh, for once I kind of agree with you.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Entertainment > General Chat

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Is BLU vs. S-DVD the new format war? Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology Ernest Rister 49 01-11-2009 01:36 PM
Toshiba says Blu-ray could still lose format war General Chat DetroitSportsFan 29 02-21-2008 01:56 PM
Is Toshiba fighting a personal war, and not a format war? General Chat tron3 25 02-06-2008 01:05 PM
What will Toshiba say to the HD DVD consumer when they lose the format war? General Chat rexington 28 12-23-2007 01:00 PM
Opinion: Why Sony Won't Lose the Next-Gen War PS3 Dave 56 11-02-2006 10:17 PM


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:02 AM.