|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $14.37 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $67.11 43 min ago
| ![]() $35.00 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.32 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $49.99 | ![]() $36.69 | ![]() $49.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $37.99 | ![]() $29.99 | ![]() $29.96 | ![]() $31.99 | ![]() $68.47 1 day ago
|
![]() |
#1 |
Active Member
|
![]()
Didn't really know which subforum to post this in, but I thought it sounded like a newbie question :P.
Is it normal for blu-ray/dvd releases to have a different running time than when it was shown in the theaters, despite not being cut? I've noticed with a few dvds lately that the running time listed on the dvd is often a few min shorter or longer than the time listed on most websites such as imdb and wikipedia. Is it possible that these were originally shown at a different framerate which then had to be sped up or down to fit within the PAL specifications for the dvd/blu-ray release? |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Blu-ray reviewer
|
![]()
The reason why there is a difference is because the DVDs in Norway are in PAL, therefore there is a 4% discrepancy with the original theatrical running time. You could add the PAL timing on the DVD profile because this is the length of the film in PAL
![]() Pro-B |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Blu-ray Count
Jul 2007
Montreal, Canada
|
![]()
just to add to what pro-b said, films in the US are filmed at 24 frames per second, PAL is built on 25 frames per second (50i) while NTSC is on 60i ( they were designed to work with the frequency in electricity used in Europe and here). Films here gets 3:2 pull down (2.5x24=60i) but for Europe they just play the film a bit faster which also affects the pitch in audio
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Blu-ray reviewer
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|