As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Spawn 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.99
6 hrs ago
Re-Animator 4K (Blu-ray)
$38.02
1 hr ago
Peanuts: Ultimate TV Specials Collection (Blu-ray)
$72.99
5 hrs ago
Back to the Future 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.99
6 hrs ago
A Nightmare on Elm Street Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$96.99
5 hrs ago
Red Planet 4K (Blu-ray)
$38.02
7 hrs ago
Dan Curtis' Late-Night Mysteries (Blu-ray)
$20.99
1 hr ago
In the Mouth of Madness 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.73
7 hrs ago
The Rocky Horror Picture Show 4K (Blu-ray)
$37.99
3 hrs ago
The Bone Collector 4K (Blu-ray)
$22.49
1 day ago
The Life of Chuck 4K (Blu-ray)
$23.99
7 hrs ago
Weapons 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.95
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-10-2012, 03:47 PM   #1
BrianW_UK BrianW_UK is offline
Junior Member
 
Sep 2008
Default IMMORTALS - US vs UK release

The UK release has been confirmed as cut by the BBFC (rating lowered from 18 to 15), can anyone with the US version confirm the runtime? I'm guessing Universal have released the same version everywhere as is their normal practice

UK runtime (with cuts): 110m 34s (18s of cuts)
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2012, 03:52 PM   #2
chamillionaire chamillionaire is offline
Active Member
 
chamillionaire's Avatar
 
Jun 2011
450
Default

The UK only has the 18s of cuts.....The US was not edited and says 110mins
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2012, 10:09 PM   #3
manicsounds manicsounds is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
manicsounds's Avatar
 
Oct 2009
Tokyo
227
4992
99
Default

Yes, 18 seconds of cuts, but there are an extra 18 seconds of replacement shots.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2012, 10:24 PM   #4
Petra_Kalbrain Petra_Kalbrain is offline
Blu-ray Archduke
 
Petra_Kalbrain's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Vancouver, BC
5
561
3
20
Default

Censorship in any form is still censorship. That link is hardly a justification for the UK treating their citizens like infants.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2012, 10:41 PM   #5
nametag nametag is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
nametag's Avatar
 
Jan 2010
London, UK
4
506
28
4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petra_Kalbrain View Post
Censorship in any form is still censorship. That link is hardly a justification for the UK treating their citizens like infants.
It's not censorship. It's the BBFC saying 'you can release this as is with an 18 certificate' and the studio replying 'ok, well we'll make cuts to get a 15 rating so that we can make more money'.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2012, 11:38 PM   #6
Petra_Kalbrain Petra_Kalbrain is offline
Blu-ray Archduke
 
Petra_Kalbrain's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Vancouver, BC
5
561
3
20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nametag View Post
It's not censorship. It's the BBFC saying 'you can release this as is with an 18 certificate' and the studio replying 'ok, well we'll make cuts to get a 15 rating so that we can make more money'.
Last time I checked, every other country has no problems with the added 18 seconds of footage being exposed to their citizens without an 18 or R rating. The BBFC is saying "our citizens are too fragile and infantile to handle this material."

That is what is FORCING the studio to make the cuts.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2012, 11:40 PM   #7
VincentVinyl VincentVinyl is offline
Active Member
 
VincentVinyl's Avatar
 
Apr 2010
24
Default

Well you could say that about the US as well then: How many films have been cut to avoid an R rating? Quite many.

And in Germany it is even worse. UK seems more liberal than most countries in that regard with their age ratings.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2012, 05:44 AM   #8
mredman mredman is offline
Banned
 
Jun 2008
13
7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VincentVinyl View Post
Well you could say that about the US as well then: How many films have been cut to avoid an R rating? Quite many.

And in Germany it is even worse. UK seems more liberal than most countries in that regard with their age ratings.
Walking dead season 1 is also cut so is I spit on your grave (new version and old) i think UK is more fragile towards vioilence while US is more fragile towards sex. But they still dont cut up home video releases like UK and germany do.Which is really there loss because if they really think more people is gonna buy a censored version they are sadly mistaken
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2012, 07:30 AM   #9
AlexSing AlexSing is offline
Expert Member
 
AlexSing's Avatar
 
Jul 2011
Singapore (via London)
137
Australia

Quote:
Originally Posted by mredman View Post
Walking dead season 1 is also cut so is I spit on your grave (new version and old) i think UK is more fragile towards vioilence while US is more fragile towards sex. But they still dont cut up home video releases like UK and germany do.Which is really there loss because if they really think more people is gonna buy a censored version they are sadly mistaken
As a Brit, I'd definitely have more sex than violence
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2012, 09:44 AM   #10
psicon psicon is offline
Expert Member
 
Jun 2009
1389
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petra_Kalbrain View Post
Last time I checked, every other country has no problems with the added 18 seconds of footage being exposed to their citizens without an 18 or R rating. The BBFC is saying "our citizens are too fragile and infantile to handle this material."

That is what is FORCING the studio to make the cuts.
Isn't Immortals rated R in the US?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2012, 11:55 AM   #11
Petra_Kalbrain Petra_Kalbrain is offline
Blu-ray Archduke
 
Petra_Kalbrain's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Vancouver, BC
5
561
3
20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by psicon View Post
Isn't Immortals rated R in the US?
I didn't think so. But it turns out I was wrong about that. Now it begs the question as to why the studio didn't bother just letting the 18 rating stand and release the uncut in the UK. So, it is the studio that is censoring their own work?

Is it possible that the BBFC told them that they wouldn't allow the film to be shown in the UK with an 18 rating? Thus, putting the studio in a position of having no choice but to cut it? That is the only thing that would make sense to me behind the studio cutting their film just in the UK when they are fine with the uncut version being R/18 everywhere else in the world.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2012, 12:15 PM   #12
snooloui snooloui is offline
Power Member
 
snooloui's Avatar
 
Oct 2010
UK
394
Default

It's quite obvious what the reasons behind it are. The BBFC said they would release it with an 18 certificate. The studio didn't want that as they can get more people in the cinema with a 15 certificate and so chose to cut the film. It's got nothing to do with censorship and everything to do with making money.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2012, 01:13 PM   #13
Kevin Coed Kevin Coed is offline
Active Member
 
Nov 2011
74
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mredman View Post
Walking dead season 1 is also cut
Not by the BBFC though. They passed what was submitted to them.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2012, 01:15 PM   #14
Kevin Coed Kevin Coed is offline
Active Member
 
Nov 2011
74
Default

From the BBFC website regarding Immortals :-

This work was cut. The cut(s) were made at the request of the distributor to achieve a particular category. To obtain this category cuts of 0m 18s were required., some or all of these cuts were substitutions. Details of cuts below may contain spoilers of plot details. Show details »

Company chose to make cuts to reduce violence in order to achieve a 15 classification. Cuts were made in line with BBFC Guidelines and policy. An uncut 18 classification was available.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2012, 01:18 PM   #15
Petra_Kalbrain Petra_Kalbrain is offline
Blu-ray Archduke
 
Petra_Kalbrain's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Vancouver, BC
5
561
3
20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snooloui View Post
It's quite obvious what the reasons behind it are. The BBFC said they would release it with an 18 certificate. The studio didn't want that as they can get more people in the cinema with a 15 certificate and so chose to cut the film. It's got nothing to do with censorship and everything to do with making money.
But why didn't they have any problem with an R rating in other countries though??? THAT is what confuses me. Had they cut it in North America they could have also gotten way more posteriors in theatre seats. And yet, the R rating was fine here. Why do it there when they could have just as easily done it here for the same reasons.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2012, 01:51 PM   #16
Kevin Coed Kevin Coed is offline
Active Member
 
Nov 2011
74
Default

The next rating down from an R in the US is the PG-13 - the film would have to have been completely emasculated to achieve that rating. In the UK you can still get away with quite graphic violent imagery so that option was available here.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2012, 02:15 PM   #17
DVDANDY DVDANDY is offline
Junior Member
 
Sep 2008
Default

watched last night fox region a locked uncut immortals and i have to say i liked it the video and audio are demo quality if you like 300 which i do you will like this i was playing in in 9.2 surround sound and the hole house was rocking god bless blu ray
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2012, 03:26 PM   #18
BrianW_UK BrianW_UK is offline
Junior Member
 
Sep 2008
Default

All good posts, but doesn't answer my question!
Have Universal released the same version in all countries (they normally do), or the US version the equivalent of the UK '18' (uncut) version?

If it's the same, then the BBFC's reach is extending beyond the UK borders!
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2012, 03:30 PM   #19
lgans316 lgans316 is online now
Blu-ray Baron
 
lgans316's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
RM16, United Kingdom
17
498
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianW_UK View Post
All good posts, but doesn't answer my question!
Have Universal released the same version in all countries (they normally do), or the US version the equivalent of the UK '18' (uncut) version?

If it's the same, then the BBFC's reach is extending beyond the UK borders!
Universal isn't the sole distributor overseas.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1253864/companycredits
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2012, 03:44 PM   #20
StumpyBloke StumpyBloke is offline
Member
 
Jun 2011
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianW_UK View Post
All good posts, but doesn't answer my question!
Have Universal released the same version in all countries (they normally do), or the US version the equivalent of the UK '18' (uncut) version?

If it's the same, then the BBFC's reach is extending beyond the UK borders!
I'd like to know this too...I want to decide if to get the US version (no region code right??) or the UK one. I don't want a cut version if possible.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:18 PM.