|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $24.96 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $13.99 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $30.50 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $34.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $29.96 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film2/DVDRe...ac_blu-ray.htm
"Bottom line is that both editions are strong but the Paramount's MPEG4 encode is the winner in image. As we will reiterate in closing this is more to validate the Paramount purchase as it is much more reasonably priced than the Japanese (or European) Warner." Go and check it.This is why BD win the war and it is the most advantage format till now |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
I don't believe the guy at DVDBeaver properly explained this, so I will give it my best shot.
These discs are all from the same master it appears. Therefore, when analyzing a 1080p screenshot of the discs from the same master you are going to see a nearly identical picture. The higher bit-rate of the Paramount domestic release allows for a greater change from one image to the next. This results in improved handling of motion and fewer motion artifacts that would present themselves in a more heavily compressed disc. This means that a still-image, like those presented, would not provide an accurate description of the improved picture quality of the higher bit-rate disc. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Blu-ray Guru
Sep 2007
|
![]()
Looking forward to watching this one asap.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Active Member
|
![]()
Isn't Paramount is using the same AVC encode that they used on the HD DVD of Zodiac which was released a year ago? The HD DVD was also AVC: http://hddvd.highdefdigest.com/841/zodiac.html
Last edited by onyxx; 01-08-2009 at 08:06 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Expert Member
|
![]() Quote:
I'm happy that the war is over and the format with bigger space and more potential to grown won, but if all we get from double the bit-rate and extras being on another disc is a barely perceptible difference than Im not sure I would say this is the reason BD won. Still, glad to see Paramount took advantage of the space on Blu instead of just porting over the HD DVD version or Japan version on Blu. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
The Descent MPEG vs AVC (need help from AVC owners) | Blu-ray Movies - North America | Eagle_23 | 105 | 04-06-2021 03:29 AM |
AVC Vs. VC-1 thread | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | Beta-guy | 14 | 11-22-2007 04:15 PM |
Why did Paramount went AVC with TF | General Chat | Papi4baby | 5 | 10-22-2007 04:03 AM |
Is AVC better than VC-1? | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | mainman | 14 | 04-10-2007 12:51 AM |
What is the difference between AVC and VC-1? | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | mainman | 10 | 08-01-2006 03:05 PM |
|
|