|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $82.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $35.94 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $23.60 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $101.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $34.68 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.54 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $28.10 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $48.44 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $35.99 |
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
|
![]()
This movie has always been in my top 10 movies of all time.I was wondering, what if this entire film was shot in black and white, and there was never any technicolor scenes?? Would people remember this as fondly?? Im curious to hear some thoughts.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() Last edited by Crimson King; 08-18-2010 at 11:19 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Special Member
|
![]()
I think it would of still been a big movie but would it still hold up to kids today probably not. It would of probably gotten the colorization treatment though at some point if it was filmed in black & white. Especially when Ted Turner bought the rights to it with the Time/Warner merger.
I would also bet if it had been filmed in black & white Hollywood would of pumped out a remake by now. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]()
Funny thing is, if I remember right, this film wasn't that well-received at the time of its release. It kinda worked againt all odds and found popularity over the years that followed.
I do believe that the interplay between color and B&W is an integral part of the film's style, and helped reinforce the interplay between fantasy and reality. Without that, I do believe that the film would have lost some of its power. I would even think that it would have been remade at some point between the 40s and now (not counting "Tin Man") if that was the case. But as it is, it's now a classic, and untouchable! ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
I think it doesn't make a lot of sense to deconstruct a film to the sum of it's parts. Surely part of the enduring magic of the Wizard of Oz is the transition from sepia to color - but asking whether removing that element would make it cease to be a classic would be like asking whether it'd be the same without Judy Garland. Or the songs. Or the munchkins.
A great many things go in to making a film special. I spend much less time wondering what if they did something differently and much more time appreciating the fact that they did it right in the first place. I'm thinking my neice and nephew need to see this the next time I'm home. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Blu-ray Duke
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
I think the movie would have lost much of its' impact without color. The transition from sepia to color is one of the most dramatic and memorable parts of the movie. Without color, the green skin of the wicked witch would never have been noticed, "The horse of a different color" might have had alot of people scratching their heads, and those ruby slippers...
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
The Wizard of Oz (MGM 1939) will never be remade. That style of Hollywood musical has come and gone. I know that we'll be seeing a lot more Oz material coming to theaters though, including new adaptations of the Wizard of Oz, but it would be a mistake to call these remakes.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
L. Frank Baum wanted to use the new medium of Color Printing, and not only wrote in that every region in Oz was color-coded (Emerald City being the obvious example), but that, in the first paragraphs of the story, "Everything in Dorothy's Kansas world was grey..." Which makes you appreciate the idea of why she's singing a song about a rainbow at the beginning of the movie. |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|