|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $82.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $101.99 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $39.02 1 hr ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $124.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $23.79 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $35.99 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $24.96 |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Blu-ray Jedi
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
FFS, I wish just ONE of these morons, somewhere, someway, would stop adding a year to Blu-Rays release cycle when comparing to DVD. Stop comparing Year 5 of DVD to Year <4 of Blu-Ray. STOP. STOP!!!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Michael Bay's #1 Fan
|
![]()
I don’t understand the price issue people have. $20 for the majority of new releases, give or take a couple $$$$, is pretty reasonable as far as I’m concerned.
I worked @ best buy for 6 years while dvd was taking off and people had no problems spending $24.99 on 2 disc releases. Lots of 2 disc blu rays are coming in less than that on release day right now….and big name titles too. Iron Man 2 as an example. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]() Quote:
I'm also a little baffled by the notion that catalog releases should be immediately discounted. I can understand people waiting until the price of a catalog release drops to the ten dollar range but it's ridiculous to expect most let alone all of them to be released at that price. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Senior Member
Nov 2008
|
![]() Quote:
It's also a double edged sword that Blu-ray players are backward compatible. Unless combos, DVD players weren't that way. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
No, Blu-Ray won't get to 20k by next year, but that's not the point. The point is from the day it was released every so-called "Journalist" has repeatedly compared Blu-Ray to DVD as if Blu-Ray had an entire extra year. It's no wonder people believe Blu-Ray is farther behind DVD than it may be, when every single article compares year 3 of DVD to year 2 of Blu-Ray, year 4 of DVD to year 3, and now year 5 of DVD to year 4 of Blu-Ray. It's absurd, and it has GOT to stop. By this point it's beyond ridiculous. Even if you go to the soft launch of Blu-Ray, you are still well under 4.5 years...so WHY would you compare numbers against DVD at the 5 year mark? *EDIT* FYI, the original journalists were purposely doing it, trying to lump Blu-Ray into the "High def market" as if HD DVD should somehow be counted against Blu-Ray. These people were doing it with an agenda, purposely trying to sabotage Blu-Ray, and they succeeded, because now people don't even think about when Blu-Ray was released, they just auto-add a year...even when trying to say something good about Blu-Ray. Last edited by Terjyn; 11-03-2010 at 11:38 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
There should be a phasing out of DVD titles and replaced by the BD equivalent. Also, there should be more releases of TV series of blu. The price level should be reduced by at least 25%. I'd like to see series like: Batman, Wonder Woman, Stargate SG-1, Stargate Atlantis, Star Trek: TNG, DS9, Voyager, and Enterprise, The Flash, Buck Rogers.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|