|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $82.99 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $101.99 22 hrs ago
| ![]() $28.10 1 hr ago
| ![]() $23.60 28 min ago
| ![]() $48.44 1 hr ago
| ![]() $33.54 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $124.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $39.02 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $24.96 |
![]() |
#1 |
Active Member
|
![]()
Hi everyone,
Love the community here at Bluray.com! Right to the point. I just upgraded to a 65inch led Insignia calibrated by the geek squad, a Pioneer Elite SC-75 and a 9.1 home theater system. Pictures to follow soon! My question is, I have a PS3, PS4 and now an OPPO. My wife and I tested this bad boy with the Amazing Spiderman 2 bluray and God we can't tell a difference! ![]() Am I doing something wrong? Or should I send this back and replace to the Darbee edition? I have it all plugged in correctly straight to the receiver from the HDMI 1 which is the Marvell processing video. I will be putting tonight the new turtles movie and we will see how it flows. Any help is appreciated! |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]()
for the most part, all of those machines should show pretty much the same. keep in mind that you have 30 days to send the oppo back for a full refund, minus the shipping back cost. if you have doubts, make sure to take advantage of that 30 day policy.
![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Robbieedr (12-19-2014) |
![]() |
#8 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
Blu Ray bits are Blu Ray bits.
Bits from a $50 player equal bits from a $500 player. If you... 1. Only connected HDMI 2. Don't own SACD/DVD-A 3. Don't watch much DVD 4. Don't stream much. You wasted your money on the Oppo. (Regarding LCD in general. There are those of us that feel that every LCD needs a Darbee to be watchable) Last edited by schan1269; 12-17-2014 at 05:48 AM. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Kryptonic (12-17-2014) |
![]() |
#9 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
You are not wasting your money on a Oppo.
Top class support. Top class upscaling (yes, superior scalers are available, but they are not integrated and cost around the same or more than an Oppo itself). Solid build quality. Guaranteed reference output (yes, all BD players should output exactly the same, but it is not always the case). You don't need a DVP for LCD. ("Those of us", meaning just you ![]() To answer the OP's question, between the PS3, PS4 and Oppo it will be hard to impossible to see any difference between them, as all 3 are reference players. The Oppo will have the advantage over the other two if using the analog outs for audio, but as schan1269 listed, if outputting audio over HDMI, there should be no difference, in audio quality. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Robbieedr (12-19-2014), rubystone356 (12-17-2014) |
![]() |
#10 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
To RobbieeDr. You want the machine to take exactly what's on the disc and display it bit for bit. The Oppo you purchased definitely does that. Now, about Darbee processing. My uncle has the Darblet and I borrowed it for a few days a couple of months ago to give it a test drive to see what all the hype is about. I personally enjoyed it on a low setting, and from what I understand about it, it brings out the high frequency detail that's already on the disc. It will not make a poorly mastered blu-ray or dvd look good because the Darbee is not creating information that's not there. I still haven't purchased one for myself yet because I'm waiting to see what's going to happen with the native 4k players next year but, it sure is tempting!!!
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | morbidcorpse (12-18-2014), Robbieedr (12-19-2014) |
![]() |
#11 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
If the Blu-ray producer wanted to 'bring out the high frequency detail', they would, and its called 'EE' (Edge Enhancement), the Darbee is redundant, and thus not needed to provide a natural looking picture.
If the OP wishes to test their players and see if any flaws are present, I would recommend the Spears & Munsil 2nd Edition test disc, this disc features test patterns that are used to evaluate the performance of a player. As I said, all 3 players are reference, and it will only come down to playback compatibility. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Naiera (12-17-2014) |
![]() |
#12 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
Example: take a movie which you use for reference in audio, and one with video. Content you're extremely familiar with it's details. Compare on device you're accustomed with, then Oppo. Differences will stand out. For me, I immediately noticed subtle details in the audio dynamics that were so much more, it was amazing. The film I used was The Matrix. As for video, I like to use the 240hz refresh on films that have a lot of CGI. For instance, Star Trek.. Of course, the 240 makes it look "live" or like a soap opera, a look some don't care for, however, the Oppo's detail is so great, you barely notice a difference with this feature on or off, on an LED TV. I believe you will not be disappointed one iota. Also, disc loading times are the fastest, probably out of any machines. My experience. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Robbieedr (12-19-2014) |
![]() |
#13 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
Placebo is a powerful effect.
Although I am not going to question you because I don't know all of the facts with regards to your setup, what player did you previously own, was it correctly outputting video and audio, how was/is the equipment connected, is your setup calibrated, what, if anything has changed in your room, etc. I agree with your last sentence with regards to loading times, I would be interested in seeing how all three of the mentioned players compare in terms of that. Pretty close is my guess. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() Quote:
The Oppo would also cause a V-shaped artefact in the single-pixel checkerboard in the S&M Image Cropping 24p pattern which I couldn't get rid of, not even on HDMI 2 which is supposed to be devoid of extraneous processing. The same pattern on the Panny is perfect, although if I play around with the Detail Enhancer (sharpening) then the exact same V-shaped pattern appears, which suggests that the MediaTek chip in the 9x series has some sort of undefeatable sharpening, never mind the undefeatable noise reduction of the main QDeo processor. The Oppos are tremendously well engineered machines with superb analogue sound quality and they're awesome for playing back whatever files you may have on USB (the BDMV playback is handy and there's no Cinavia on the 9x series), but at the end of the day ones and zeros are ones and zeros, and as long as they're piped to my TV and amplifier unmolested, that's all I need right now. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Robbieedr (12-19-2014) |
![]() |
#15 |
Power Member
![]() Aug 2012
Germany
|
![]()
I'm owning a BDP-93 (region free) for over 3 1/2 years now. To me it's the best, most reliable and easy-to-handle player I've ever had. I've been through quite a few before (Sony, LG, Samsung, Phillips) and none of them comes close to the Oppo in terms of quality and reliability.
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: |
![]() |
#16 |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]()
This is not true. Either player may F up on chroma upsampling, which will give a minor difference in picture quality. It is also quite possible to make a player with DNR and EE that can't be switched off, so never assume.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
I wonder if the 103/105 features those issues. |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|