|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $35.99 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $33.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $33.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $30.49 | ![]() $35.99 1 day ago
|
![]() |
#1 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
Is this all because of their stupid compression software? Microsoft has a rich history of supporting ANYTHING. Doesn't matter if they thought it was the right thing for pc's or not, they would support it. In other cases, they bought out the company. The product usually lived on as their own, or quietly went away.
Why does the wealthiest "technology / software company" choose the lowest common denominator to succeed DVD? Sure, you can argue that a 30GB HD-DVD is fundamentally about the same PQ as a 50GB blu-ray, but the audio is NOT. Hence the extra space DOES make a difference. Anyone have any firm answers and not just FUD-mising? Thanks. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Book: Microsoft promised Toshiba HD DVD support (why they did it) | General Chat | scrumptious | 6 | 03-27-2009 08:22 PM |
Microsoft claims first with native Blu-ray support [for their OS] | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | Blaumann | 41 | 08-22-2008 07:41 PM |
Microsoft switches support to Blu-ray | General Chat | GreenMotion | 4 | 08-22-2007 01:23 AM |
Heaven And Hell DVD | General Chat | Freis968 | 2 | 08-07-2007 03:34 AM |
Microsoft May Support Blu-ray in Vista After All | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | Marwin | 5 | 01-21-2006 02:14 AM |
|
|