|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $37.99 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.49 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $16.05 1 day ago
| ![]() $22.49 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.96 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $14.99 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.99 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.95 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.95 | ![]() $22.49 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $28.99 | ![]() $45.00 |
![]() |
#1 |
Active Member
|
![]()
Didn't really know which subforum to post this in, but I thought it sounded like a newbie question :P.
Is it normal for blu-ray/dvd releases to have a different running time than when it was shown in the theaters, despite not being cut? I've noticed with a few dvds lately that the running time listed on the dvd is often a few min shorter or longer than the time listed on most websites such as imdb and wikipedia. Is it possible that these were originally shown at a different framerate which then had to be sped up or down to fit within the PAL specifications for the dvd/blu-ray release? |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|