|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 3D Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $11.99 | ![]() $8.99 | ![]() $17.99 | ![]() $14.99 | ![]() $9.37 | ![]() $9.55 | ![]() $18.50 | ![]() $29.99 | ![]() $19.78 | ![]() $9.55 |
![]() |
#1 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
A common criticism levied at converted 3D movies is the perception that it's not really 3D because "it looks the same with my glasses on or off". Usually I reject that notion - perhaps it's just subtle 3D. I figure, "no way they didn't even bother TRYING..."
I was wrong. I was playing around with methods for taking 3D screenshots from Blu-rays and testing them out on Piranha 3D. Not a great conversion by any standard, but I was pretty surprised when I came to this shot in the climax: [Show spoiler] That's a direct capture from anaglyph output. There's no ghosting or color fringing anywhere. Nothing. Switching back and forth between right and left eye views produced the same image. This was it; the holy grail of bad 3D conversion. A completely untouched 2D shot left in the middle of a 3D movie. The climax of the movie, no less. For comparison, here's another shot they converted: [Show spoiler] Anyone else notice any shots that were flat in a 3D movie? Bonus points for evidence! |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|