|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 | ![]() $101.99 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $23.79 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $124.99 21 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $35.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $33.49 | ![]() $33.49 | ![]() $99.99 |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
|
![]()
To whom it may concern,
As a consumer who buys a lot of software. I would like to make an appeal to you the studios to please get rid of the "Digibook" packaging in favor of a normal more superior plastic case. My issue is that the Digibooks although cheaper to produce do not adequately protect the software as much as a plastic case does plus if something happens to the digibook one has no choice but to buy yet again another digibook especially if there isn't an alternate edition of the particular title available. All studios could learn by the outstanding example provided by Criterion in their plastic cases for both dvd and blu-ray releases. They use in my opinion the best case available in most cases on the market. Thank You! |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Special Member
|
![]()
Studios seem to charge more for Digibooks, so they're probably more profitable and they'll continue to make them because some people may prefer them, even collect them. For example, the recently released What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? is $30 and only available in Digibook packaging -- I bought it, but would have preferred an ordinary case, with a price of $20 or less. Criterion has issued some Digibooks/packs, and that's fine with me, but I do think they ought to use ordinary Blu-ray cases -- they can be had in a thicker size, which is commonly used in the UK, if they need a thicker case for a booklet.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
Also, how come the UK uses thicker blu-ray packaging than in other countries? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
Edit: Breakfast at Tiffany's is in a 15 mm Amaray case and was less than 8 GBP. Last edited by joie; 12-29-2012 at 08:39 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
I knew British packaging was thicker (most of my BDs are from the UK, but I have imported a couple from the States), I was just curious as to why they bothered giving the UK different thickness packaging? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
Digibooks are actually more expensive to produce and usually reserved for premium catalog releases. I like them quite a lot, but I can see why you prefer plastic cases.
I love what Criterion does. Plastic cases made of strong plastic(thought they also do digipaks which are basically digibooks without the books), high quality artwork printed on high quality paper, and a booklet with every film. But most studios use lower quality plastic cases and don't include booklets, so I actually prefer the digibooks. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
Even Criterion (and I do happen to like their plastic cases) uses cardboard or other non-traditional packaging for special releases: look at The Complete Monterey Pop, Seven Samuari, etc. I'll agree that a board box is never going to hold up as well as a plastic box just as LP album packaging doesn't hold up as well as a CD jewel case, but most collectors will tell you they prefer the old LP album packaging (although the larger scale of the LP package is also an issue in that case). As for protection of the BDs, I know there are lots of complaints on these forums about discs supposedly getting scratched by cardboard slots, but I've never had a single problem. It's not like you take out the same BD every day to watch it again. Besides, just because it's in a board box doesn't mean it can't have a plastic tray. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
As for Criterions, they have absolutely beautiful packaging, and their artwork isn't conventional- all of which is what makes The Criterion Collection appealing. |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|