9.2 review

[oldgame]

I'm reviewing the differences between Dolby IIz and DTS neo X.
PLEASE DON'T TURN THIS INTO A 5.1 VS 9.1 BASHING.
I want to hear opinions between the two decoders.
I'm using and Integra 50.4 reciever with back surrounds and heights. It's a 9.2 system.
Switching between the two I noticed that PlIIz has a wider front stage,meaning the front's and center have a wide sound stage and the heights and surrounds tend to get lost and not localized.

The Neo X has a narrower but higher sound stage. And all 9 channels seam to be equally balanced better.

Now some might prefer the wider sound stage, but I think that the Neo x sounds much tighter.

The heights really fill in nicely using Neo x, and with PLIIz they seam to only occasionly output anything.

Now I prefer using Neo x but this is pesonal preference. Please let me know what you think.