|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $33.49 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.49 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $74.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $35.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $4.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $27.13 1 day ago
| ![]() $35.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $9.99 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.57 1 day ago
|
![]() |
#1 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
I have been trying to go through and add high-quality scans for some of the Korean import slipboxes and Steelbooks I have purchased. The problem is that even though the site has the system set up so you can show the slipcovers instead of the cases if you want to, people keep uploading the slipboxes as the "cover" and the internal case art as the slip (or worse, special "all contents" product shots).
I'm going to keep fixing these even as other users try to revert the correctly uploaded slip-as-slip entries, so if the rule ought to be that the cases should be the primary "front / back" and the slips should be, well, the "slip / slipback," can the cover art moderators be more attentive to accidentally approving people who have submitted the information backward? (Not to mention, somehow promote more clearly that the users can set up the collection to view their collection the way they keep trying to improperly rig it, just by using the site settings?) |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|