As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
A Better Tomorrow Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$82.99
1 hr ago
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
 
Shudder: A Decade of Fearless Horror (Blu-ray)
$101.99
16 hrs ago
Corpse Bride 4K (Blu-ray)
$23.79
11 hrs ago
Alfred Hitchcock: The Ultimate Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$124.99
1 day ago
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
 
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
Superman 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
The Howling 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
 
Jurassic World: 7-Movie Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$99.99
 
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
 
The Bone Collector 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-06-2015, 04:42 AM   #1
Engage Engage is offline
Active Member
 
Jul 2014
Default BLU-RAY and Home Media Centers: How do they work ?

Hey guys, it seems like home media centers keep getting more popular. Devices like this: http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.aspx?id=1270

These devices are great because all the user needs to do is plugin a 3TB USB drive and they have access to all of their content without getting out of their chair.

I've only bought a few movies on Blu-Ray discs so it's not an issue for me, but I keep seeing how users on here seem to have so much content on Blu-Ray disc so how do you balance having a home media center?

Thanks!
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
mayday72 (07-22-2015)
Old 06-06-2015, 04:56 AM   #2
refnulf refnulf is offline
Power Member
 
refnulf's Avatar
 
Jun 2010
MY
36
Default

WD TV is great for playing digital files, and streaming services such as Netflix, Hulu, WWE Network, HBOGO, Showtimeanytime, etc. The quality of those streams might be great, but it doesn't compare to the blu-rays that you have on disc. Of course a better piece of hardware would be the Roku 3.

Blu-ray handling is a problem, having to constantly change disc might be an issue but ripping em to your HDD and watching em off your network using a network media player solves the problem there, especially when you're trying to watch a TV show that has 24+ disc on the complete series blu-ray collection. I have a network media player that allows me to play full blu-ray copies off my hard drives, and any other file I might have on the network.

I use the streamers like WD TV, or Roku 3 for Netflix/Hulu, etc and watch what I can't get on blu-ray, you won't find latest tv shows out on blu-ray a day after it airs so those services are good for something. Also watching archives of tv shows that you might not have on blu-rays, or aren't out on blu-ray at that time.

Other than that, I stick to blu-rays because of the quality. It's not the best format out there, but the best you can get for personal viewing. Avoid all the digital copies that come with the blu-ray (UV, DC, Itunes) because they're sub standard encodes and a waste of time if you're a person that appreciates the quality a blu-ray gives you.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2015, 05:19 AM   #3
slimdude slimdude is offline
Banned
 
Apr 2009
-
-
-
8
Default

Home Media Centers are convenient, if you stream a lot of movies and other content on the internet. Personally, It wouldn't benefit me because, I don't stream my movies. I very much prefer physical media.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2015, 03:16 PM   #4
mogwai_macabre mogwai_macabre is offline
Special Member
 
mogwai_macabre's Avatar
 
Jan 2015
US
-
7
Default

I use a Roku and a PS3 for streaming Netflix/Amazon/Hulu/Vudu. They work great for that. The WD device probably works just as well.

But I really don't see the benefit of ripping blu-rays to a hard drive for convenience. First off, 3TB isn't really a lot of space. Not for full quality blu-ray rips at least. Second, it's going to take a large amount of your time to rip your collection. Then what about accessing menus/special features? I'm not sure.

All for what? To not get off the couch once every two hours?

I think for the most part, people who use a 3 TB hard drive under their TV for media are most likely downloading their content, either from legitimate or illegitimate sources, and not storing full quality 50GB blu-ray on their hard drive.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2015, 03:37 PM   #5
rdodolak rdodolak is offline
Blu-ray Prince
 
Jul 2007
880
3733
939
338
1099
75
11
20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mogwai_macabre View Post
I think for the most part, people who use a 3 TB hard drive under their TV for media are most likely downloading their content, either from legitimate or illegitimate sources, and not storing full quality 50GB blu-ray on their hard drive.
I was reading this article yesterday about WD's 10TB hard drive and saw that someone made a comment that 10TB was huge and implied no one would need one other than for video editing. What amazed me is that they stated they had 600 movies, 5000 episodes, photos, and music on a 2.5TB HDD. In order to get all of that on a 2.5TB drive those files must look like shit.

600 movies would average out to ~4GB per movie (DVD quality or lower) on a 2.5TB HDD without taking into account the 5000 episodes and photos and music. I can't imagine what the average file size would be with the episodes factored in.

http://gizmodo.com/sadly-this-10tb-h...not-1691245306

Quote:
Originally Posted by thatguyalex
10TB is huge...I mean, unless you are video editing, I can't imagine the average user comes anywhere near that kind of storage requirement...personally I have 2.5 tb's of stuff and that's, cough, like 600 movies and 5000 eps of tv plus all my photos and music and what not...
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
mogwai_macabre (06-06-2015)
Old 06-06-2015, 03:44 PM   #6
makinbiscuits makinbiscuits is offline
Active Member
 
Jun 2012
1
155
222
Default

If you're ripping blus and not compressing them down 3tb will be filled fast. Better invest in a Nas.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2015, 03:47 PM   #7
mogwai_macabre mogwai_macabre is offline
Special Member
 
mogwai_macabre's Avatar
 
Jan 2015
US
-
7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdodolak View Post
I was reading this article yesterday about WD's 10TB hard drive and saw that someone made a comment that 10TB was huge and implied no one would need one other than for video editing. What amazed me is that they stated they had 600 movies, 5000 episodes, photos, and music on a 2.5TB HDD. In order to get all of that on a 2.5TB drive those files must look like shit.

600 movies would average out to ~4GB per movie (DVD quality or lower) on a 2.5TB HDD without taking into account the 5000 episodes and photos and music. I can't imagine what the average file size would be with the episodes factored in.

http://gizmodo.com/sadly-this-10tb-h...not-1691245306
I agree, but with today's codecs a 4GB file would look a lot better than a DVD. I wonder what the file sizes of 1080P steaming Netflix movie are? Less than 10GB I would guess, but I really don't know.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2015, 10:20 PM   #8
bkfountain bkfountain is offline
Expert Member
 
bkfountain's Avatar
 
Sep 2014
Greensboro NC
405
335
79
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rdodolak View Post
I was reading this article yesterday about WD's 10TB hard drive and saw that someone made a comment that 10TB was huge and implied no one would need one other than for video editing. What amazed me is that they stated they had 600 movies, 5000 episodes, photos, and music on a 2.5TB HDD. In order to get all of that on a 2.5TB drive those files must look like shit.

600 movies would average out to ~4GB per movie (DVD quality or lower) on a 2.5TB HDD without taking into account the 5000 episodes and photos and music. I can't imagine what the average file size would be with the episodes factored in.

http://gizmodo.com/sadly-this-10tb-h...not-1691245306
i ripped my dvd collection to a HDD before getting into bluray and would easily get mkv movies at like 800MB-1GB, tv shows at 500MB.

havent started ripping blurays yet though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2015, 10:44 PM   #9
rdodolak rdodolak is offline
Blu-ray Prince
 
Jul 2007
880
3733
939
338
1099
75
11
20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkfountain View Post
i ripped my dvd collection to a HDD before getting into bluray and would easily get mkv movies at like 800MB-1GB, tv shows at 500MB.

havent started ripping blurays yet though.
Even if we were to assume the episodes were 500MB each 5,000 of them is right at 2.5TB. Obviously converting them to H.264 would account for some of the file size reduction but even then I can't see how all of that material can fit on a 2.5TB HDD without sacrificing quality. Not to mention DVD quality is no longer the best quality any more so I couldn't fathom reducing it any further.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34 PM.