|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $45.00 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.95 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $82.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $22.95 1 day ago
| ![]() $27.99 21 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $47.49 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.89 19 hrs ago
| ![]() $101.99 | ![]() $23.60 1 day ago
| ![]() $26.59 13 hrs ago
|
![]() |
#1 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
Why is it that on SD formats like Laserdisc and DVD that the difference from Dolby Digital/AC3 5.1 and DTS 5.1 was so much larger in scope and quality then it is for Dolby Digital TrueHD and DTS-HD on Blu-Ray? I know that Dolby Digital TrueHD as a audio codec barely gets used in modern Blu-Rays but I have heard that the overall sound quality is pretty much identical to the more popular mainstream DTS-HD codec.
of course comparing one film that uses one to a different film that uses the other is impossible for a wide range of obvious reasons, but I'm talking about from a pure specs point of view, 2 Blu-Ray releases, same tittle, same mix but one has Dolby Digital TrueHD and the other uses DTS-HD. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|