|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $35.00 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.32 1 hr ago
| ![]() $22.49 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $49.99 | ![]() $31.99 | ![]() $36.69 | ![]() $29.99 | ![]() $29.96 | ![]() $96.99 | ![]() $29.96 | ![]() $86.13 | ![]() $37.99 |
|
View Poll Results: Would you rather have 7 speakers w/ less power each or 5 speakers w/ more power each? | |||
Use all channels of 7-channel receiver, but less power per speaker |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 60.00% |
Use 5 channels so receiver power is split into 5 more powerful channels instead of diluted by 7 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 40.00% |
Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Jun 2021
|
![]()
Would you rather:
[A] Use the maximum number of channels that your receiver can handle, but have less power to each speaker, or [B] Maximize the power to each speaker by using less channels than your receiver can handle? For example, the DENON AVR-S750H AV Receiver can handle 7 speaker channels, but presumably that would mean the receiver's power / hrz / performance split to each speaker would be less per speaker. But if you only used 5 of the channels and left 2 empty, would that mean those 5 channels would have more power / better performance per speaker? |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Blu-ray Archduke
|
![]()
I don't think using less channels means a receiver will provide more power to the remaining speakers (unless you are bi-amping). You can always add an amplifier if you need more power.
Back to your question, I would always go for 7 speakers since that is the minimum required for Dolby Atmos. I don't listen to content with the volume so high that I find I need more power in my speakers. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|