|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $124.99 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.97 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $39.95 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $28.99 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.95 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $36.69 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $23.79 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $24.99 | ![]() $99.99 |
![]() |
#3 |
Power Member
|
![]()
I've seen some very good quality HD presentations on TV, but never anything that rivaled a Blu-Ray image. Game of Thrones on HBO HD looks EXTREMELY good, but it still is compressed quite a bit on Dish, which is what we have at home. Until we get the cable and satellite providers to really amp up their bandwidth, compression is going to rob the image of any chance it has to complete with Blu-Ray.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Active Member
Jan 2012
|
![]()
I saw Star Trek: First Contact on Universal HD about a year before the BD came out; the HD broadcast had none of the noise reduction that plagues the BD release and was less contrasty. It seems like that broadcast was the "straight" film to digital transfer, and then it was tweaked for the BD release.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
This can conceivably happen if the HDTV transfer is newer than the Blu-ray (which I bet will become increasingly common as Blu-ray ages, as some Blu-rays are going on seven years old), or if (as someone mentioned above in regards to Trek) additional tinkering like DNR was done to the Blu-ray version that does not appear on the HDTV version. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Power Member
|
![]()
Back when I had my 42" TV I remember thinking the 2Fast 2Furious HDTV (cable) transfer looked much more detailed and crisp than the Bluray. I remember they even had it zoomed to fit the whole screen.
I would be curious to compare now that I have a much better 60" which is making every blu look more amazing. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Blu-ray Ninja
Oct 2008
|
![]()
Back to the Future is less filtered, though still nothing great.
There's an HDTV rip of Fellowship of the Ring out there that doesn't have the DNR that's on the TE blu-ray but still has the same color timing, if you don't dig on the EE's color grading. Not many I can think of. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
There are a few more:
ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK: the HDnet version looks MUCH better than the recent MGM blu-ray release, which is a bit murky on detail (whereas the HDnet version has the proper color timing, normal brightness and a lot of detail) LAST OF THE MOHICANS: the HDnet version has the proper brightness levels, and is also the theatrical cut. The blu is notoriously dark and murky. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]()
That makes no sense. How can an HDTV transfer be better than Blu-ray?? Blu-ray uses less compression. HD channels are compressed to death!
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Blu-ray Ninja
Oct 2008
|
![]()
Obviously compression isn't everything. The HD version could use a different transfer with different color, less EE/DNR, whatever.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
Not to mention, it also comes down to the source print used to create the HD digital transfer. If an HDTV broadcast uses a much better source, then it can most definitely look better than a blu-ray release. Hell, just check out the forum threads on all of the various THE PUNISHER (1989) blu-ray releases in Europe (specifically comparing the Danish release with the UK and Germany releases).
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|