|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 | ![]() $101.99 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $124.99 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $23.79 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $134.99 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $33.49 | ![]() $22.96 |
![]() |
#2 | |
Blu-ray Duke
|
![]() Quote:
I currently have an older Onkyo from around 2010 that continues to serve me well and so a part of me feels like I should stick with what has worked (Onkyo brand), however I know I number of people like the Pioneer Elite line of products and I'm a bit more partial to the styling of the Pioneer LX303... I'd be curious to hear what your thoughts are if you picked this one up and have ran it through its paces. At the moment I have Polk Audio TSI400 fronts with a Polk Audio TSI CS200 center and smaller rear surrounds, but am looking into picking up the full line of Klipsch Reference speakers in the future possibly and want to ensure that whatever I purchase now will sound great with either set of speakers later on. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Blu-ray Duke
|
![]() Quote:
I liked the idea of owning a Pioneer Elite product, but the Onkyo was what I was familiar with as I currently have an older Onkyo receiver, I wanted the THX certification, and I liked that the Onkyo had pre-outs allowing for further amplifcation. Add on to the fact that Pioneer was purchased by Onkyo in 2015 and the LX303 and Tx-NR787 are basically identical for only $50 difference... I decided why not just go for the most bang for my buck and get the top of the line mid level 830. (The next step up on Onkyo receivers costs thousands and at that point I was looking at separates, so this instead should hopefully provide more than enough of everything for my needs.) Amazon Link ![]() |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Buster Capone (05-11-2019), Member-425016 (06-12-2019) |
![]() |
#5 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
I was also looking at the two Onkyo models mentioned here.
The decision was made when I found an offer I could't refuse on the 787 ($550 Canadian). While I sometimes think that I could have used the preouts with my old amp for a 7.1.4 setup, I know that it would not have been realistic for me to cram that many speakers into my modestly sized HT. This is the first ONKYO that I have owned and I am very pleasantly surprised. I was looking to simply add height channels to my existing 7.1 setup. I could never have imagined what an upgrade ATMOS/DTS X would be! I also think that the ONKYO setup procedure has wrung out the best performance from my existing PARADIGM monitor series speakers. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | TripleHBK (05-11-2019) |
![]() |
#7 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
I picked up the LX-303 a week ago but have yet to set it up. Price was my main drive for this model. I got an open box in perfect condition for $370 from Best Buy. I know Amazon had them for $399 new, but working toward my 'Elite' status ,lol. I considered an Onkyo, but I stuck with the Pioneer as I was trying to keep the price down. Good deal considering the retail price. I have yet hook it up as I've been busy and will have to revisit these pages when I do. I know what to expect as I currently have a Pioneer VSX-90. My wife will be wondering why I bought ANOTHER receiver as the current one is a 2015 model. My main reason for upgrading is the Dolby Vision capability (my current one came out with 4K capability not Dolby Vision as it was still new) and the 4K UltraHD 60P/4:4:4 is on all of the inputs and not just three. I currently have to run my video signal directly to my TV from my 4K player and my audio to my receiver. Because of this, I have to switch my TV over to HDMI 2 each time we watch a movie. Using this receiver, I should be able to route everything thru the receiver and not have to switch over my TV connection each time. Plus, I get more speaker connections and more power
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Active Member
|
![]()
What's tommyboy81, long time. Well hopefully I can shed somewhat of a light (to an extent) on the subject (if I'm not to late).
I just recently bought the Pioneer Elite VSX-LX 503 (which is like a step up from the 303) and I'm happy with it. I like the MCACC room correction (but in all honesty, this is the 1st receiver I have that has it). If you (or anyone of you) have any questions let me know and I will answer them for you. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Member
|
![]()
I purchased the LX303, also due to price and my home theater room size did'nt need the 7.1.4 setup, I went with the 7.1.2 Atoms setup up, I loved it, great receiver, excelent clarity and man does the surround steering is phenomenal, coming from a 10 year old Sony Strdg-920 7.1 did it's job but nothing like going into Atoms! it's like crack, all I want to do is find and buy any really good 4K atoms movie and listen to that soundtrack!! I highly recommend the Pioneer LX303.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
I agree with you. I have been buying nothing but 4k Atmos and DTS:X movies (I've become some what of a Atmos:X snob ![]() I have 2 front module but was thinking about getting 2 more for the rear. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Member
|
![]()
sorry for the delayed response, I used the MCAC and was dissapointed, after all the beep-boop-bop ding sounds when all was calibrated it was off, it gave my front speakers as large and distance was off, so I manually calibrated it and it sounds much better than what the settings results where for the MCAC, and yes I am an ATMOS snob as well, OMG have you seen or actually lol heard a quiet place? FANTASTIC use of ATMOS!!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
No, I have not seen A Quite Place but it is on my list to get because I heard that the Atmos in the movie is.... well reeeealllly atmospheric. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Member
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|