As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Batman 4-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$32.99
 
I Love Lucy: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$40.49
1 hr ago
Legends of the Fall 4K (Blu-ray)
$15.99
4 hrs ago
Caught Stealing 4K (Blu-ray)
$37.49
3 hrs ago
The Dark Knight Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$28.99
 
The Conjuring 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.13
3 hrs ago
The Mask 4K (Blu-ray)
$45.00
 
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
 
Weapons 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.95
 
One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.99
 
A Better Tomorrow Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$82.99
 
The Terminator 4K (Blu-ray)
$16.99
1 day ago
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray.com > Feedback Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-13-2020, 03:10 AM   #1
Brandon K Brandon K is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
Dec 2015
Canada
40
1016
23
13
8
Thumbs up Change Requirement for Booklets

Quote:
Originally Posted by Booklet
An insert with details about the film. Needs to have binding and be more than a two-page insert.
I really suggest removing the qualification that a "booklet" must have binding. As I catalog my collection, I'm finding a good number of titles that have fold-out booklets with 3 to 6 panels (6 to 12 sides) with significant content related to the release. In fact, some foldouts are far more significant in content than inserts that just happen to be stapled.

The key here for collectors and enthusiasts is that the release contains some type of insert with significant content. It shouldn't matter if it has binding or not. The content is the important part... and users who are rejecting submissions based on the letter of the law are not understanding this because they are focused on just following the letter of the law...

I can see why someone came up with this criteria in the first place, to rule out inserts of little significance. However, perhaps the criteria was created before a time when some labels were releasing significant foldout inserts. As inserts have evolved, so too the criteria needs to be re-evaluated and evolve.

Criterion is a primary example. The only difference between their stapled booklets and their foldout inclusions is that one has staples, the other doesn't. They can have the same number of pages and the same significant content. They just made the "artistic" choice, depending on the release, that one happens to be stapled while another happens to be foldout.

So a release that has a large foldout that contains an essay about the film as well as the technical details about the restoration of the film isn't counted as a booklet?

Also, what is meant by a "two-page insert" anyway? Do you mean a single 1-panel, 2-sided insert, or do you mean a folded 2-panel, 4-sided insert?)

And lastly, what about 2-sided inserts with important information (to some collectors) such as named chapter listings? Collectors tracking down old releases would want to know that a release contains these inserts.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
moviefan1234 (07-15-2021)
 
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray.com > Feedback Forum

Tags
binding, booklet, foldout, insert


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:39 AM.