Native 3D is stronger than todays 3D encodes?

[Paul H]

Missing Visual symmetry?

I perceive a noticeable stronger visible degree of 3D fusion taking place from native 3D film and 3D SBS/OU frame formats. I believe this happens because of the absence of unique, different, captured Left and Right-eye cues, not present on the digital storage media. A digitally captured one-eye-view, has the exact information used for recreating the second eye-view. Missing important second eye-view’s 3D cues?
Currently I find this is the case for both streamed 3D movies in theaters and from Blu-ray 3Ds on television and same for digital photos.

I first noticed this viewing native IMAX 3D film presentations, comparing the same movies to digital projection counterparts and by having the same experience with a couple of Blu-ray 3D movies accidentally formatted as standard Blu-ray in 3D SBS, later corrected for 3D-Blu-ray digital framepack for a comparison.

Digitally authored 3D streaming and Blu-ray 3D digital framepack encodes have only 1 complete one-eye-view image stored as digital information. The second image is recreated using exact first image cues for decoding similar areas on the second eye-view. Lacking different visual symmetry?

(Darbee white papers explore the importance of 3D cues.)