|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $35.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.49 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.49 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $34.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $35.99 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.00 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $42.99 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $30.48 | ![]() $54.49 |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
I've seen where the HD DVD proponents are arguing that the sales numbers are skewed because there are fewer new releases on HD DVD so they don't have anything to buy and when the new releases hit, they will be back up.
I checked on eproductwars and noticed that in the top 10 listings there were 2 releases available in both formats. Both Babel and The Departed were new releases on pre order. In both cases Blu-Ray was significantly higher on a title to title comparison. It seems to me that this contradicts their argument since both formats are on equal footing and shows that there is truly a higher demand for Blu-Ray. Can anyone think of something else that might cause these different sales ranks? I'm interested in real assesments of what's going on and can see some validity in what they're saying. These 2 titles seem to show though that a limited release shcedule has a small effect compared to the difference in the consumer base the PS3 has brought. Any thoughts? |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Super Moderator
![]() Nov 2006
|
![]()
Even the 'argument' that BD has higher sales because of more releases is not valid, as new releases cause sales as a direct effect, that is what they are intended to do. It's not like the studios are releasing these titles out of the goodness of the hearts, they want higher sales for their format.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Moderator
|
![]()
Actually, Darin went through the release lists looking at things since early December and I believe Blu-ray only had one more release than HD DVD during that period. So the argument of less titles coming out doesn't hold. Less popular titles maybe, but not less physical titles.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
Next time you hear that argument, point out that the only way such is viable is if the only people buying HD DVDs are the same ones that adopted the format early - meaning no new adopters. If they were still bringing in new adopters, they should have no problem competing in sales. Such is evidenced by The Fifth Element and Underworld 2 still being some of the top sellers on BD.
Last edited by Chad Varnadore; 02-03-2007 at 09:38 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Moderator
|
![]() Quote:
We read: "HD DVD would be winning if it had more content than BD" (duh!) Universal is so far making promises, with no schedule. And I doubt you'll see anything come out until the recent player hole is plugged. Gary Last edited by dialog_gvf; 02-03-2007 at 09:43 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Super Moderator
![]() Nov 2006
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
One other interesting thing I found on EProductWars was the history for those 2 titles. In both cases clicking the "View Sales Rank History" showed that HD declined over time while BR remained constant or had a slight increase. This to me looks like HD has a constant customer base while BR seems to have an increasing customer base. Last edited by ra1024; 02-03-2007 at 09:45 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Super Moderator
![]() Nov 2006
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
That's my point. HD DVD isn't growing. It's the same early adopters that bought into the format when it first came out that are perpetuating the format. Even when HD DVD was receiving a lot of new releases from Universal, sales had already leveled off and had been that way for months. For studios to percieve a demand, you've got to continue selling both new releases to the format and titles that have been out for months. Otherwise the market isn't growing, it's fully matured. And fully matured at this stage, means dead in the water.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Super Moderator
![]() Nov 2006
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
Ok now I get it. MaxPower's right, it is an illogical argument since it's only valid if you assume the customer base is constant which is what they're trying to disprove.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
I personally wouldn't recommend buying into HD DVD at this time, unless you've just got to have Universal. Even then I'd give it till next CES to see if Universal decides to support BD or at least hold off until HD shows some new signs of life. In fact, I've put all my planned Universal purchases on hold too.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Active Member
Oct 2006
|
![]()
I do not see how HD DVD can win this war. Maybe HD DVD isn't dead, but it is hemorrhaging badly. It is somewhat amusing to hear proponents say "I'd buy more HD DVD content if it were available" when the single biggest argument for BD in the last year was that higher studio support would translate into more content, and that content, not cost of players, would decide the outcome. With the ps3 (I own one) bringing the entry cost of players down, BD has momentum, more announced releases, more CE support etc.
Universal is putting out combo disks which I suspect won't have any interesting HDi support since the extras will be on the DVD side of the disk. In other words, they are cheaping out. I think they see the writing on the wall and are preparing to go neutral. I think there is a good chance they will release a BD this year, likely in Japan, and as soon as they do that, you can plant HD DVD. Once Universal blinks, Disney and Fox won't, and BD will be the only format to have all major studios. If HD DVD could get Fox or Disney to blink first, it might breathe more life into the format, but I just don't see that happening. Scott |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Senior Member
Dec 2006
|
![]() Quote:
HD-DVD zealots use price as a huge argument saying that Blu-Ray costs SO MUCH and then you bring up the PS3 and they ignore you. BDs cost the consumer pretty much the same amount and the uber-expensive Fox BDs don't even touch the prices for the combo discs. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Power Member
Oct 2006
|
![]()
Here's The Latest Argument, from....surprise!...another microsoft employee. How much are they paying these guys to spread the talking points?
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
The old DVD versus VHS argument | General Chat | Batman1980 | 3 | 05-17-2009 08:20 AM |
Blu Ray Recorder sales SURPASS dvd sales in japan | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | SellmeyourDVD | 6 | 12-11-2008 10:57 PM |
Lamest HD-DVD argument ever? | Blu-ray Movies - North America | TheForce8686 | 12 | 12-15-2006 04:37 AM |
HD-DVD sales | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | partridge | 22 | 11-18-2006 08:35 PM |
|
|