|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $24.96 15 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $20.07 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $19.99 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $27.13 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $54.49 |
![]() |
#6 |
Active Member
|
![]()
There are several formats being devoped:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3D_optical_data_storage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protein-coated_disc Are a couple. Not to mention what hasn't even been thought about yet. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Blu-ray Archduke
|
![]()
That's a tough question to answer for two reasons.
#1. Full HD downloads are going to be nipping at the heels of consumers somewhere in the next 10 years. That could be the deal breaker for physical media. #2. Many people will see too many disadvantages to download storage and will want to continue collecting physical media (I know that I will). And this will continue to create a demand for physical media. Although my opinion has a very heavy teeter-totter "back and forth" arguement to it, my personal guess is going to be that 1 more form of physical media will exist. That physical media will be able to produce the full 4K resolution of the original film print. But, the question remains, "will there be TVs and projectors able to output that resolution in order to enjoy the quality?" |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Moderator
|
![]()
Here is my humble opinion.
1. Blu-ray is certainly not the ultimate. I think it's only a taste of what can be expected down the road. And that day will surely happen! 2. Physical media will always be around. It may not be the primary source of movies and music down the road, but it will always be around. It may stop being mass-produced and instead be a commodity that is offered on-demand and produced by our inevitably far more reliable computer systems in the future. There are so many arguments about this issue in the media and on forums such as this, but there isn't a definative answer. And that's because there can't be one. It's all conjecture. But I have great faith in the capacity of the human mind to expand beyond the norm and seek out new and better ways of producing the next best thing. Right now Blu-ray is the ultimate for me and I'm enjoying the experience. I'm enjoying upgrading and tweaking my system and buying (and renting) movies. I enjoy inviting my friends over for a "night at the movies"...it's wonderful! |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Blu-ray Archduke
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Banned
Jul 2008
|
![]()
The delivery mechanism and the resolution of any future format are separate issues.
First off, I personally hope that physical media lives long and prospers. I don't think HD downloads make any sense at all. I think they're a waste of bandwidth and the quality suffers drastically. If anyone thinks that the American internet providers are up to the task of delivering very much more bandwidth in the future, you're sadly mistaken. We're already looking at download caps down the road. Having a little plastic disc that holds 50gb is fairly compelling, and future formats promise to deliver even more storage. Besides, I'd like to hold something in my hand when I spend a fortune on it. Secondly, there is such a thing as a 4k monitor, a Sapphire 56" model. It costs just south of $60,000 and is meant for corporations who apparently need that sort of resolution. I, however, question the need for that much resolution. Would there even be a benefit to 4k at the consumer level? I'm personally fine with a decent 720p lcd. And at 3840x2160, I'll be that much more paranoid about dead pixels, so no thanks. Last edited by threenine; 07-31-2008 at 05:58 AM. Reason: grammar |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Blu-ray Duke
|
![]()
sounds great but we dont have the technology for that yet and im sure these companies probably havent even thought of how that can be possible on what will need to be done to make that happen
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Active Member
|
![]()
Even if the technology did exist, where is the profit motive in giving you the absolute best today? "They" want you to upgrade every 5 - 10 years. That is basic business theory. Keep you coming back for more.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Special Member
|
![]()
i think for home use, at least home tv use.. Blu-ray is sufficient.. maybe if your talking huge screens you might want more than 1080p.. but is it really going to be noticable on 40" screens? my wish would be that all movies can look as good as the top transfers on blu-ray... i hate watching some films that arent much better than their dvd counterparts.. it defeats the purpose of using high def in the first place.. so if they could make strides in improving picture quality for existing./older films.. thats where my money would go
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Low cost internal 6X BLU-RAY readers and 8X BLU-RAY read/write drives are instock | Blu-ray PCs, Laptops, Drives, Media and Software | HDTV1080P | 20 | 01-27-2009 11:29 PM |
Funai's Blu-ray player features Panasonics's UniPhier chip and Sony's Blu-ray Optical | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | Tekman | 2 | 02-20-2008 03:51 PM |
> 1 million+ Blu-ray discs sold to date - March Blu-ray sales stronger than HD DVD | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | Tekman | 15 | 04-20-2007 05:54 PM |
|
|