|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $124.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.97 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $39.95 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $33.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $28.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.95 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $23.79 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.99 | ![]() $24.96 |
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
|
![]()
I've heard the original film stock/elements of a movie - given good and "proper" condition of preservation - can last 50 years, then severe signs of decay will show up.
So basically, all the seventies, eighties and nineties movies have many decades or years ahead of them before their picture quality would further degrade. Is it true? I'm just worried for the fifties/sixties movies which didn't get a BD treatment yet. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Blu-ray Ninja
Oct 2008
|
![]()
Depends... there are countless factors, like process control during film manufacturing, how the film was exposed, how it was processed, how it was stored, how and how many times it was handled by careless lab techs... even a 30 year old film could be in bad shape if people couldn't leave the negative alone, which apparently is the case for Apocalypse Now.
The dyes in color film are not stable and will inevitably fade, depending on storage conditions. I have 25-year old Ektachrome slides that are completely magenta, hopefully studios store their film more carefully. Black and white film (and therefore 3-strip technicolor color films) doesn't fade, but is equally susceptible to the negative being damaged/burned up/lost/vinegar syndrome due to the plastic base decomposing. I don't think "cheap film stock" is really the issue. The vast majority of Hollywood films were shot on whatever movie film Kodak made at the time. Last edited by 42041; 03-31-2011 at 04:46 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
you do know that film's been around for 122 years right?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_stock Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Blu-ray Duke
|
![]() Quote:
Most restoration teams make a duplicate of the original film elements and work with these duplicates to create a restored master. Very few restorations are made of the origiinal negaive itself since they can not go back if make a mistake. The Sound of Music has several masters available of varying quality. The same goes Casablanca, Treasure of the Sierra Madre, and Once Upon A Time in the West. There have even been materials found in the strangest of places. Supergirl's original elements were found in an attic in the UK while Metropolis' elements for the 153 version were found in Argentina. And again, even if the original film elements are not available, there are other options. Anchor Bay's director's cut of Army of Darkness is sourced from film elements and Bruce Campbell's personal beta tapes. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]()
Well, I know Toho studios didn't preserve their stuff properly in the 60's. King Kong vs Godzilla looks so horrible. Also, I've seen some Thai films that are not even 20 years old look like they were beaten to s**t. Spirited Killer with Tony Jaa has this faded red to look to it in a lot of shots.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|