|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $9.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $35.33 | ![]() $27.13 1 day ago
| ![]() $27.57 1 day ago
| ![]() $32.96 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $34.99 |
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
|
![]()
I was watching the 3rd Hobbit prequel with my sister (who has only seen LOTR) when she asked, "why didn't they make these first?" I tried to explain why but she didn't get it. Then I started thinking about many film sagas. State Wars, LOTR, and the like, and tried to imagine the prequels being written first. Can you imagine the OT being released in place of the PT? Or LOTR in place of the Hobbit prequels? Do you think they'd be that different? Do you think they'd be as good? Postulate!
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|