|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $82.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $101.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $39.02 1 hr ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $124.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $23.79 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $35.99 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $24.96 |
![]() |
#3301 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
The post is 1.85:1 (breath of fresh air!) and was projected so. The screen it was projected onto was a scope one and the movie had black bars at the sides. But a small portion of the bottom, a sliver, was covered by black semi transparent material, like a border.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3302 | |
Blu-ray Knight
May 2017
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3304 |
Blu-ray Knight
May 2017
|
![]()
I used to work at a movie theater long ago and as far as I can remember, it's about framing because with movies shot in flat, if you don't frame too low, you will see boom mics in the image and that border is usually used to cover up extra information in the print because flat movies are essentially 4 perf (aka square-ish)
I could be wrong here and I'm not positive on how flat films are projected via DCP. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Riddhi2011 (01-30-2018) |
![]() |
#3305 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
There was an issue with the 3D so it played in 2D only. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3306 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
so someone explain to us why the black bars on the side? It wasn't like watching a 4:3 tv show but it was just there and kinda disappointing as with a movie presented in full frame IMAX you would think you would be able to see the entire movie fill up the entire screen. I would check it out at Udvar but they are playing that Bollywood movie in 3d.....a bollywood movie in IMAX and 3d no less!?!? Running time is nearly 3 hours :O |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3308 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3309 |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]()
It was shot in anamporhic, so no expanded scenes amigo. Also, why the frick would go see the movie for that when you can go on porn sites that offer more racier (and probably more healthier) examples of bondage?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3310 | ||
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#3311 |
Blu-ray Knight
May 2017
|
![]()
Why porn sites? There have been far better films that handled the bondage subject much better. Secretary is a good example and a not so good example would be Exit to Eden.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3312 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3313 | ||
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Riddhi2011; 01-30-2018 at 03:39 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#3314 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
It was. It was the first film I've seen at the Dolby Vision theater that was 1.85. 2.4 films fill the screen. "The Post" was full height, but had black bars left and right. It was okay and the edges were sharp, but masking would have made it better.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3315 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
I am wondering how Avengers:IW will be projected nation wide on IMAX screens? Considering that there is a lot of talk that it was shot completely in IMAX. I expect it to have black pillars on the left and right side of the screen if Maze Runner is any indication of what to expect. My guess is the only true way to see IW will be at Udvar....unless they pull a TLJ and letterbox the final product on IMAX screens.
The director needs to come out on twitter and tell us how many IMAX full frame sequences are in the movie. Hopefully we don't get a VAR IMAX like in TF:TLK. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3316 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3317 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
Unless the screen is a CIH (2.39:1); in which case it'll be either cropped or pillarboxed. The former being more likely than the latter.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3319 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3320 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
Yeah, I was under the impression that it'd be 1.90 throughout but the bokeh of anamorphic is unmistakable in the trailer, likely the UP70 glass again.
But someone mentioned something that because the Alexa 65 is 6.5K anyways they could've actually framed up the conventional 2.39 extraction a fair ways inside the anamorphic frame which would give them enough room to vertically embiggen. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|