|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $82.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $35.94 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $23.60 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $101.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $34.68 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.54 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $28.10 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $48.44 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $35.99 |
![]() |
#3801 |
Blu-ray Knight
Feb 2012
|
![]()
Yeah, different IMAX theaters will often show different films or alternate showtimes between titles.
At the four here, two are showing 2001, one is showing 2001 during the day and Dark Knight at night, and one is showing The Meg. The schedule isn't fully up for next week, but I see two theaters are showing the Marvel movies, and one is continuing with evening shows of Dark Knight (nothing for the day time shows), Kin comes out in IMAX next week as well so that might take the other showings. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3802 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
However, the new "unrestored" version of 2001 by Chris Nolan uses the original 2.20:1 aspect ratio. So, it should fill most of the 1.90:1 ratio IMAX screens. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3803 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3804 |
Blu-ray Knight
Feb 2012
|
![]()
Perhaps as a counter to the Marvel IMAX Labor Day week. Regal will be offering its own discount premium large format re-release week by showing the Lord of the Rings trilogy in RPX for $5 per ticket this coming week.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3806 |
Special Member
|
![]()
Starting Friday:
IMAX 40 miles away: Kin (2D) IMAX 70 miles away: The Meg (2D) no MCU fest for me :/ ...If I were to see The Meg, which would be better: IMAX 2D (if it was showing in IMAX 3D I wouldn't be asking), or 3D w/Dolby Atmos (I've not been to this auditorium yet, new upgrade). (Next up in IMAX for me: First Man) Last edited by benji888578; 08-30-2018 at 05:41 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3809 | |
Blu-ray Knight
Feb 2012
|
![]() Quote:
But I wouldn't be surprised either way, and probably need someone to go to ones of those showings in 12 channel sound and report (even then they may not notice, sadly Ragnarok and Ant-Man and the Wasp barely used the extra channels, Infinity War was a bit more aggressive though). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3810 | |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]() Quote:
out of curiosity where did you see it, I thought I had read that IMAX-digital screens were being changed over to 12-channel with the upcoming upgrades of the AMC/Regal IMAX setups to laser/12-channel. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3812 | |
Blu-ray Knight
Feb 2012
|
![]() Quote:
http://investor.amctheatres.com/file...yFile=37597163 |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Dubstar (08-30-2018) |
![]() |
#3813 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
So previously I'd heard that Mission: Impossible - Fallout was shot with the Panasonic Millennium DXL2 and the Red Monstro for the IMAX scenes.
Well the American Cinematographer article is out and, according to that, it was actually the older DXL1 and Red Weapon Dragon cameras. Before the actual jump, the IMAX-ratio shots on the plane were done with the DXL, and then the Reds were used for skydiving footage. Once they enter the building they've landed on it switches to a mix of Red and DXL. The helicopter chase is mostly DXL footage but the shots inside Tom Cruise's cockpit were done on the Red because they couldn't fit the DXL in there. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3815 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
Saw Mission: Impossible - Fallout in IMAX 2D today. I sat on the centre seat of the fifth row from the front. The reason was I wanted to have that immersive feeling with the screen borders disappearing beyond my field of vision; like in a 15/70 auditorium. And my I was so wrong!
I was rewarded with glorious pixels! I could see every individual blocks clearly and every horizontal line of the 2K projection. During the 35mm portions, which had grain, the pixels appeared less obtrusive, but during the digitally shot IMAX sequences, which was really clean, I could see all the pixels. My seat can be seen below. Kolkata Liemax.jpg This is truly Liemax of the first order if sitting on the fifth row from the screen we still can make out individual pixel blocks. I enjoyed the dual 4K (non-IMAX) presentation of the film better! No pixels were visible and the screen was over 4 stories tall, while this digital IMAX is a little over two stories tall. Sound was good. However it wasn't a match for the Dolby Atmos I heard on the dual 4K screen. The IMAX scenes were shot really well. The expansions were subtle because the aspect ratio of 2.39:1 and 1.89:1 are similar. Had it not been for the pixellation, the fifth row experience would have been great! Last edited by Riddhi2011; 09-04-2018 at 06:41 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3816 |
Expert Member
Sep 2012
|
![]()
I know that for film stuff petitions are generally useless but just trying to get the word out re: the whole First Man 15/70 debacle.
https://www.change.org/p/universal-p...70mm-imax-film Letting Chazelle shoot in the format and have the aspect ratio expansions and then *not* have prints is discouraging... |
![]() |
![]() |
#3817 | |
Blu-ray Count
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3818 | |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3820 | |
Expert Member
Sep 2012
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Riddhi2011 (09-04-2018), UFAlien (09-05-2018) |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|