|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $45.00 23 hrs ago
| ![]() $84.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $14.97 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $82.99 | ![]() $27.95 19 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $22.95 1 day ago
| ![]() $27.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $17.49 35 min ago
| ![]() $24.96 |
![]() |
#261 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
As for Across The Universe...wasn't it one of those films heavily processed in the digital domain (grading, digital IP)? If the BD is transparent to the master, throwing higher bitrate isn't going to help. |
|
![]() |
#263 | |
Member
Nov 2007
Madrid, Spain
|
![]() Quote:
We would subscribe online to a title, pay only a small 'retainer' fee via credit card when 'preordering', and as soon as the title reaches a certain number of commitments, it can get produced and shipped. The possibilities around building a community are huge, and you can always partner with other companies for distribution, etc... I know, not easy, but if someone does this, I want credit for the idea! ![]() |
|
![]() |
#264 | |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]() Quote:
Several small companies have done this (RightStuf with Captain Tylor, AnimEigo with Macross), basically they have to take names, and when it's time to press they make sure you're still interested and get your payment details, then run the discs, charge you and ship them, and hope that number stays above their cost to produce |
|
![]() |
#265 | |
Blu-ray Insider
Jan 2007
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
#266 |
Blu-ray Insider
Jan 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
#267 | |
Blu-ray Insider
Jan 2007
|
![]() Quote:
I checked a production disc and thought the picture quality was in the top 10 percent of our releases. It is a solid video master. I don't know which titles you are comparing this to that you feel look superior? |
|
![]() |
#268 | |
Blu-ray Insider
Jan 2007
|
![]() Quote:
I don't really notice the lines since they are not very bright, but if I am not mistaken, it is in all the players and is not considered a defect. |
|
![]() |
#269 |
Expert Member
|
![]()
I'm confused as well, IMO this is quite possibly the best quality non animation title I've ever seen on Blu.
|
![]() |
#270 | |
Blu-ray Insider
Jan 2007
|
![]() Quote:
We did the DTS and Dolby encodes for CE3K from the same 24bit source. |
|
![]() |
#271 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
dave ![]() |
|
![]() |
#272 |
Special Member
Sep 2007
less than 10 minutes from Akihabara
|
![]()
Yeah, I think the US release of Hairspray could definitely be improved on. There didn't seem to be much grain, and faces looked a bit too smooth.
|
![]() |
#273 |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]()
Paid, we've been discussing accessibility issues over in Talk's thread, whether something could be done to write a text to speech program in Java for blind users, that would interface with some kind of HTML type menu (probably done in HDMV).
Would it be possible to write a text to speech in Java, and implement a standard something like "Hold down the A function key on boot to access HDMV menu" so that people with bad eyes can navigate the menus, and people who are annoyed with long load times can forgo those features? Or would something like text to speech have to be implemented in some kind of hardware due to processing limitations? |
![]() |
#274 |
Active Member
|
![]()
paidgeek,
I made some of my suggestions also in the 2themax insider thread, and here is his answer. https://forum.blu-ray.com/showpost.p...0&postcount=83 I found it very interesting and promising in regard to doability (does this word exist?) About the poll, I will try it when I have more time. |
![]() |
#275 | ||
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
#276 | |
Member
Nov 2007
Madrid, Spain
|
![]() Quote:
Still, I wonder if the technology is there to do small runs of BD discs, which would probably be the real show-stopper... |
|
![]() |
#278 | |
Member
|
![]() Quote:
I think as a user I could accept that any special features that were turned on were reset upon a resume play as long as the main feature picked up where it left off. I can see how trying to do a complete 'state-save' as discs get more complex could be an ever moving target. The important stuff to keep would be the place in the film, the selected soundtrack and possibly subtitles. I could live with everything else such as Pip windows not coming back as they can be easily turned back on from the pop-up disc menu. Given that resume play seems to work for simpler BDMV discs, I think it's addition to BD-J based discs would be a big boon for all. No idea how you'd retro-fit that to older titles though or even if that would be possible. My only other format wide suggestion would centre around network features. It would be nice if the studios got together to fund a unified portal for access to network features. With no keyboards on most players it's a pain in the neck to have to register, login etc for each individual movie studio that intends to provide an online experience. It would also be useful if somehow you could make use of the persistent storage that BD-Live players will have to allow a generic Java app to be accessed that allowed you to access such a portal without needing to put a disc in, to look for latest trailers for example. More difficult I expect, but might make the online features more worthwhile. Just some thoughts obviously. ![]() |
|
![]() |
#279 | |
Special Member
Jun 2007
|
![]() Quote:
I know of course that Shoot 'Em Up is not yours, but that is a recent example of something that I think looks notably better, as well as recent Fox releases such as Prison Break or Mr. Brooks or Die Hard 4. As for recent Sony releases that I thought looked better, SM3 and RE3 come to mind. I thought that Fifth Element (remastered) looked fantastic. I thought The Patriot looked very nice. To pick one specific shot in Across the Universe that illustrates what I had a problem with, the opening shot of Jim Sturgess on a beach, ending with a tight close-up. The close-up just doesn't have the crispness that I expect to see in such tight close-ups, and that is really true throughout the movie. There are some exceptions; the close-ups of Prudence during I Wanna Hold Your Hand look pretty good. Many close-ups of Sturgess seemed especially lacking. Another example of something that I thought looked bad: the blue elongated heads in the Eddie Izzard number. |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Ask questions to Compression Engineer insider "drmpeg" | Insider Discussion | iceman | 145 | 01-31-2024 04:00 PM |
"Club Penton" - Ask questions to Hollywood insider "Penton-Man" | Insider Discussion | iceman | 19563 | 04-15-2012 03:19 PM |
Ask questions to Blu-ray Music insider "Alexander J" | Insider Discussion | iceman | 280 | 07-04-2011 06:18 PM |
Ask questions to R&B Films, Ltd insider "RBFilms" | Insider Discussion | iceman | 78 | 06-09-2010 04:22 AM |
Ask questions to Sony Computer Entertainment insider "SCE Insider" | Insider Discussion | Ben | 13 | 01-21-2008 09:45 PM |
|
|