|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $82.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $27.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $41.99 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $19.96 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.99 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $23.79 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $35.94 20 hrs ago
| ![]() $23.60 21 hrs ago
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#61 | |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() Quote:
MaxCLL tells the display what the maximum light level of the content is (up to 1000 nits) and MaxFALL tells the display what the average light level of the content is (up to 400 nits). That said, Stacey Spears said he'd found out that the Warners discs appear to be carrying the data for a maximum light level of 4000 nits (as per the original Dolby Vision grade) so **** knows what's going on there. ![]() Hell, perhaps that's why some people (was it Adam?) were experiencing weird goings on regarding the Warners discs looking washed out compared to others that they'd viewed? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#62 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#66 |
Blu-ray Samurai
Jul 2008
|
![]()
They just don't care about this. They want you to buy a new HDR TV, simple as that and soon you will find only those in stores.
You want SDR? They have a format for you: it's called Blu-ray (1080p) You want the original theatrical color grading? They have a format for you: it's called Blu-ray (1080p) |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Adrian Wright (03-19-2016), HeavyHitter (03-18-2016) |
![]() |
#67 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#68 | |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]() Quote:
My tv was built November 2014. It's out of date, out of stock, & is irrelevant by today's standards. Oh & it also carries an XBR badge & cost me $5K So... Yeah.. SDR for life! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#69 |
Blu-ray Samurai
Jul 2008
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#70 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
Seems possible since i doubt the industry would miss out on potential UHD blu ray buyers cause most of them (movie fanatics mainly) have a 4K TV or projektor but not a HDR compatible one. Now they also may think we all gonna buy new sets cause of HDR(not me,i hate HDR,i'm a purists worst kind ![]() Wait for Dolby Vision UHD blues and pray they get it right ,4K with WCG and 10 bit,that's it,leave the unnatural boosting of brightness and contrast out of it and i'll jump on the bandwagon. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#71 |
Special Member
Sep 2007
The Burghs
|
![]()
Sounds like we have a market for high end 4k video processors than can do the up and down color conversions well enough to still deliver an accurate picture.
I'm sure companies like Lumagen are going to come up with products. http://www.lumagen.com/testindex.php...ncepro_details Of course only you can decide if this makes more sense than a display upgrade. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#72 | |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() Quote:
There are systems that can allow SDR and HDR on one disc, but given the lack of bandwidth (no 100GB discs) at this point in time I think the Dual Stream encode is a non-starter. Dolby Vision also made a big deal about having separate SDR and HDR layers, which is something that they still mention when asked, but they've kept it quiet that the version of DV used on UHD Blu-ray will have the mandatory HRD10 as one layer and the DV as the other layer - so no SDR layer is included. A set of standards to define the use of dynamic scene-dependent downconversion metadata is being worked on as we speak (SMPTE 2094, as mentioned in the article linked above), but it won't be finished in time to be included in any current or imminent UHD hardware. It looks as if players equipped with Dolby Vision will probably have 2094 included by virtue of coincidental timing, but even if someone waits for those players they'll still need to have discs authored with the relevant 2094 metadata to get the proper SDR transform, so current discs won't work with that system anyway. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#73 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
https://kws.smpte.org/higherlogic/ws...project_id=294 As I posted back in July 2015 on the 4K Movies Releases thread (to remind, after the panoramic shot I posted as an example as to the value of HDR for some stadium venues on a bring sunny afternoon [England v. Wales rugby match, which you correctly disclosed ![]() the ‘ST 2094’ is about dynamic metadata (content dependent and can vary frame by frame or scene by scene). There are 4 applications in the 2094 suite of documents. For those not privy to the mostly weekly tecoms of the working group for the 2094s, this is some of the tone mapping math for Application #1(which I personally favor)….. ![]() Last edited by Penton-Man; 11-22-2018 at 12:17 AM. Reason: reposted original pic after the free imaging hosting service I use changed urls/servers |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: |
![]() |
#74 |
Senior Member
Oct 2007
|
![]()
I think the HDR timeline might look like this:
2014: SMPTE 2084 added to HEVC 2015: SMPTE 2084 used in consumer products 2016: HLG added to HEVC 2017: HLG used in consumer products 2018: SMPTE 2094 and ICtCp added to HEVC 2019: SMPTE 2094 and ICtCp used in consumer products |
![]() |
![]() |
#75 | |
Senior Member
Oct 2013
|
![]() Quote:
What, you want it to stop and stay in the dark ages? Yes, there is pressure from manufacturers to sale, but also from scientists to improve image quality. Natural balance will find it's way. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#76 |
Banned
|
![]()
Yeah all 4k pre HDR TV's are so like 1983 crt's total dark ages tech
|
![]() |
![]() |
#77 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
If it were possible then there would be a market for it, certainly (Oppo would care). Both from SDR owners and from purists who don't want to see HDR on any catalog. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#78 | |
Senior Member
Oct 2013
|
![]()
The point is that advancement is inevitable even if it leaves a rather new technology redundant and irritates many last-gen (or early adopters) customers.
To answer HeavyHitter question, Quote:
But it is already been determined by SMPTE that a less random way will be used which will be defined in ST.2094. The irony is that you'll need to buy yet another new TV (or update firmware) to have SDR from HDR according to ST.2094. Last edited by James Freeman; 03-20-2016 at 02:01 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#79 | |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() Quote:
Of course, if one had their tin-foil hat on, they could argue that by that stage the usage of SDR 4K TVs for primary viewing purposes will have greatly diminished, so will there even be a significant user base that needs the scene-dependent SDR transform? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#80 |
Senior Member
Oct 2007
|
![]()
I think that SMPTE 2094 will get added to the HEVC draft this year but that the next version of HEVC could get released in 2018. Granted they might release the next version of HEVC in 2017 if there are enough companies pushing for it.
I think that a good case can be made for dynamic metadata for many years since it allows HDR video to look good on SDR displays which in 2019 will be at least 80% of the market. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|