As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best 4K Blu-ray Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
A Better Tomorrow Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$82.99
1 day ago
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
 
Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.99
6 hrs ago
The Good, the Bad, the Weird 4K (Blu-ray)
$41.99
3 hrs ago
Samurai Fury 4K (Blu-ray)
$19.96
5 hrs ago
Burden of Dreams 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
8 hrs ago
Jurassic World: 7-Movie Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$99.99
 
Superman 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
From Russia with Love 4K (Blu-ray)
$23.79
2 hrs ago
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
Corpse Bride 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.94
20 hrs ago
Longlegs 4K (Blu-ray)
$23.60
21 hrs ago
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > 4K Ultra HD > 4K Ultra HD Players, Hardware and News
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-18-2016, 03:18 PM   #61
Geoff D Geoff D is offline
Blu-ray Emperor
 
Geoff D's Avatar
 
Feb 2009
Swanage, Engerland
1348
2525
6
33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bruceames. View Post
Is the 400 nit MaxFALL at the bottom of that post referring to the the whole picture?
It's the average light level for the whole frame, yes. But that doesn't mean that the image is restricted to 400 nits, it means that you can have a 1000-nit specular highlight (like sunlight glinting off a windscreen or something) as long as it averages out against the brightness of the remaining imagery in the frame.

MaxCLL tells the display what the maximum light level of the content is (up to 1000 nits) and MaxFALL tells the display what the average light level of the content is (up to 400 nits). That said, Stacey Spears said he'd found out that the Warners discs appear to be carrying the data for a maximum light level of 4000 nits (as per the original Dolby Vision grade) so **** knows what's going on there.

Hell, perhaps that's why some people (was it Adam?) were experiencing weird goings on regarding the Warners discs looking washed out compared to others that they'd viewed?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2016, 03:25 PM   #62
bruceames bruceames is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
bruceames's Avatar
 
Nov 2012
Novato, CA
15
1337
2
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff D View Post
It's the average light level for the whole frame, yes. But that doesn't mean that the image is restricted to 400 nits, it means that you can have a 1000-nit specular highlight (like sunlight glinting off a windscreen or something) as long as it averages out against the brightness of the remaining imagery in the frame.

MaxCLL tells the display what the maximum light level of the content is (up to 1000 nits) and MaxFALL tells the display what the average light level of the content is (up to 400 nits). That said, Stacey Spears said he'd found out that the Warners discs appear to be carrying the data for a maximum light level of 4000 nits (as per the original Dolby Vision grade) so **** knows what's going on there.

Hell, perhaps that's why some people (was it Adam?) were experiencing weird goings on regarding the Warners discs looking washed out compared to others that they'd viewed?
If the max 'average' for the whole picture is 400 nits, then the max area that 1000 nits can be used is 40% of the picture (while the rest of the picture is completely dark). Thanks for the info.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2016, 07:51 PM   #63
HeavyHitter HeavyHitter is online now
Blu-ray Baron
 
HeavyHitter's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
4
154
Default

Has it been determined if a future UHD BD player will be able to strip out HDR while properly retaining/remapping the wider color gamut and 10 bit? Is this going to even be possible?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2016, 07:58 PM   #64
dvdmike dvdmike is offline
Banned
 
Jun 2010
1069
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HeavyHitter View Post
Has it been determined if a future UHD BD player will be able to strip out HDR while properly retaining/remapping the wider color gamut and 10 bit? Is this going to even be possible?
I seriously doubt it
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2016, 08:17 PM   #65
HeavyHitter HeavyHitter is online now
Blu-ray Baron
 
HeavyHitter's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
4
154
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dvdmike View Post
I seriously doubt it
That might be depressing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2016, 08:21 PM   #66
MisterXDTV MisterXDTV is online now
Blu-ray Samurai
 
Jul 2008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HeavyHitter View Post
That might be depressing.
They just don't care about this. They want you to buy a new HDR TV, simple as that and soon you will find only those in stores.

You want SDR? They have a format for you: it's called Blu-ray (1080p)

You want the original theatrical color grading? They have a format for you: it's called Blu-ray (1080p)
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Adrian Wright (03-19-2016), HeavyHitter (03-18-2016)
Old 03-18-2016, 08:25 PM   #67
dvdmike dvdmike is offline
Banned
 
Jun 2010
1069
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterXDTV View Post
They just don't care about this. They want you to buy a new HDR TV, simple as that and soon you will find only those in stores.

You want SDR? They have a format for you: it's called Blu-ray (1080p)

You want the original theatrical color grading? They have a format for you: it's called Blu-ray (1080p)
Since when?!?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2016, 08:32 PM   #68
Derb Derb is offline
Blu-ray Prince
 
Derb's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Vancouver, B.C.
11
46
3278
4
3
7
1
2
51
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterXDTV View Post
They just don't care about this. They want you to buy a new HDR TV, simple as that and soon you will find only those in stores.

You want SDR? They have a format for you: it's called Blu-ray (1080p)

You want the original theatrical color grading? They have a format for you: it's called Blu-ray (1080p)
Sad but true.

My tv was built November 2014. It's out of date, out of stock, & is irrelevant by today's standards. Oh & it also carries an XBR badge & cost me $5K

So... Yeah.. SDR for life!
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2016, 08:34 PM   #69
MisterXDTV MisterXDTV is online now
Blu-ray Samurai
 
Jul 2008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dvdmike View Post
Since when?!?
Well at least for DI movies it's true

For catalog titles not so much.....
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2016, 06:40 PM   #70
peterraes peterraes is offline
Active Member
 
May 2010
1
6
Default i read a pice about SDR beeing packed in the data...

Quote:
Originally Posted by HeavyHitter View Post
Has it been determined if a future UHD BD player will be able to strip out HDR while properly retaining/remapping the wider color gamut and 10 bit? Is this going to even be possible?
I recall reading a piece about the SDR data beeing packed alongside the HDR data so one would be able to choice,just cant recall where i read it.
Seems possible since i doubt the industry would miss out on potential UHD blu ray buyers cause most of them (movie fanatics mainly) have a 4K TV or projektor but not a HDR compatible one.
Now they also may think we all gonna buy new sets cause of HDR(not me,i hate HDR,i'm a purists worst kindbut they must realize that is not gonna happen cause most own a 4K set just over a year or so and are not about to change that rapidly wich makes sense honestly(financially).
Wait for Dolby Vision UHD blues and pray they get it right ,4K with WCG and 10 bit,that's it,leave the unnatural boosting of brightness and contrast out of it and i'll jump on the bandwagon.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2016, 07:39 PM   #71
bootman bootman is offline
Special Member
 
bootman's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
The Burghs
Default

Sounds like we have a market for high end 4k video processors than can do the up and down color conversions well enough to still deliver an accurate picture.

I'm sure companies like Lumagen are going to come up with products.

http://www.lumagen.com/testindex.php...ncepro_details

Of course only you can decide if this makes more sense than a display upgrade.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2016, 09:36 PM   #72
Geoff D Geoff D is offline
Blu-ray Emperor
 
Geoff D's Avatar
 
Feb 2009
Swanage, Engerland
1348
2525
6
33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peterraes View Post
I recall reading a piece about the SDR data beeing packed alongside the HDR data so one would be able to choice,just cant recall where i read it.
Seems possible since i doubt the industry would miss out on potential UHD blu ray buyers cause most of them (movie fanatics mainly) have a 4K TV or projektor but not a HDR compatible one.
Now they also may think we all gonna buy new sets cause of HDR(not me,i hate HDR,i'm a purists worst kindbut they must realize that is not gonna happen cause most own a 4K set just over a year or so and are not about to change that rapidly wich makes sense honestly(financially).
Wait for Dolby Vision UHD blues and pray they get it right ,4K with WCG and 10 bit,that's it,leave the unnatural boosting of brightness and contrast out of it and i'll jump on the bandwagon.
According to one commentator, the industry is "split" on the idea of proper SDR mapping: http://www.screenplaysmag.com/2015/1...uality-issues/

There are systems that can allow SDR and HDR on one disc, but given the lack of bandwidth (no 100GB discs) at this point in time I think the Dual Stream encode is a non-starter. Dolby Vision also made a big deal about having separate SDR and HDR layers, which is something that they still mention when asked, but they've kept it quiet that the version of DV used on UHD Blu-ray will have the mandatory HRD10 as one layer and the DV as the other layer - so no SDR layer is included.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HeavyHitter View Post
Has it been determined if a future UHD BD player will be able to strip out HDR while properly retaining/remapping the wider color gamut and 10 bit? Is this going to even be possible?
A set of standards to define the use of dynamic scene-dependent downconversion metadata is being worked on as we speak (SMPTE 2094, as mentioned in the article linked above), but it won't be finished in time to be included in any current or imminent UHD hardware. It looks as if players equipped with Dolby Vision will probably have 2094 included by virtue of coincidental timing, but even if someone waits for those players they'll still need to have discs authored with the relevant 2094 metadata to get the proper SDR transform, so current discs won't work with that system anyway.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2016, 01:23 AM   #73
Penton-Man Penton-Man is offline
Retired Hollywood Insider
 
Penton-Man's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff D View Post
A set of standards to define the use of dynamic scene-dependent downconversion metadata is being worked on as we speak (SMPTE 2094, as mentioned in the article linked above)....
For an update (March 2nd) progress note and estimated finish date, see bar graph....
https://kws.smpte.org/higherlogic/ws...project_id=294

As I posted back in July 2015 on the 4K Movies Releases thread (to remind, after the panoramic shot I posted as an example as to the value of HDR for some stadium venues on a bring sunny afternoon [England v. Wales rugby match, which you correctly disclosed ),

the ‘ST 2094’ is about dynamic metadata (content dependent and can vary frame by frame or scene by scene). There are 4 applications in the 2094 suite of documents. For those not privy to the mostly weekly tecoms of the working group for the 2094s, this is some of the tone mapping math for Application #1(which I personally favor)…..



Last edited by Penton-Man; 11-22-2018 at 12:17 AM. Reason: reposted original pic after the free imaging hosting service I use changed urls/servers
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Carlos2992 (03-20-2016), Geoff D (03-20-2016), Richard Paul (03-20-2016)
Old 03-20-2016, 05:08 AM   #74
Richard Paul Richard Paul is offline
Senior Member
 
Oct 2007
Default

I think the HDR timeline might look like this:

2014: SMPTE 2084 added to HEVC
2015: SMPTE 2084 used in consumer products
2016: HLG added to HEVC
2017: HLG used in consumer products
2018: SMPTE 2094 and ICtCp added to HEVC
2019: SMPTE 2094 and ICtCp used in consumer products
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2016, 01:16 PM   #75
James Freeman James Freeman is offline
Senior Member
 
James Freeman's Avatar
 
Oct 2013
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterXDTV View Post
They just don't care about this. They want you to buy a new HDR TV, simple as that and soon you will find only those in stores.
But that's the whole beauty of technological advancement.
What, you want it to stop and stay in the dark ages?

Yes, there is pressure from manufacturers to sale, but also from scientists to improve image quality.
Natural balance will find it's way.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2016, 01:29 PM   #76
dvdmike dvdmike is offline
Banned
 
Jun 2010
1069
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Freeman View Post
But that's the whole beauty of technological advancement.
What, you want it to stop and stay in the dark ages?

Yes, there is pressure from manufacturers to sale, but also from scientists to improve image quality.
Natural balance will find it's way.
Yeah all 4k pre HDR TV's are so like 1983 crt's total dark ages tech
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2016, 01:43 PM   #77
bruceames bruceames is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
bruceames's Avatar
 
Nov 2012
Novato, CA
15
1337
2
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterXDTV View Post
They just don't care about this. They want you to buy a new HDR TV, simple as that and soon you will find only those in stores.

You want SDR? They have a format for you: it's called Blu-ray (1080p)

You want the original theatrical color grading? They have a format for you: it's called Blu-ray (1080p)
I sure hope they do come out with a player that will strip the HDR. It would be fun comparing the before/after difference on an HDR TV as well as giving those with SDR TVs what they need.

If it were possible then there would be a market for it, certainly (Oppo would care). Both from SDR owners and from purists who don't want to see HDR on any catalog.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2016, 01:49 PM   #78
James Freeman James Freeman is offline
Senior Member
 
James Freeman's Avatar
 
Oct 2013
Default

The point is that advancement is inevitable even if it leaves a rather new technology redundant and irritates many last-gen (or early adopters) customers.

To answer HeavyHitter question,
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeavyHitter
Has it been determined if a future UHD BD player will be able to strip out HDR while properly retaining/remapping the wider color gamut and 10 bit? Is this going to even be possible?
It will most certainly be an option in upcoming devices (Players) in a more than palatable way.
But it is already been determined by SMPTE that a less random way will be used which will be defined in ST.2094.
The irony is that you'll need to buy yet another new TV (or update firmware) to have SDR from HDR according to ST.2094.

Last edited by James Freeman; 03-20-2016 at 02:01 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2016, 11:13 PM   #79
Geoff D Geoff D is offline
Blu-ray Emperor
 
Geoff D's Avatar
 
Feb 2009
Swanage, Engerland
1348
2525
6
33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Paul View Post
I think the HDR timeline might look like this:

2014: SMPTE 2084 added to HEVC
2015: SMPTE 2084 used in consumer products
2016: HLG added to HEVC
2017: HLG used in consumer products
2018: SMPTE 2094 and ICtCp added to HEVC
2019: SMPTE 2094 and ICtCp used in consumer products
You reckon it'll be that long before 2094 gets added to HEVC? Day-um. Them wheels sure turn slowly, and I don't feel like such a mungbean for wanting to get the Panasonic player now if proper SDR transforms are still 3 years away.

Of course, if one had their tin-foil hat on, they could argue that by that stage the usage of SDR 4K TVs for primary viewing purposes will have greatly diminished, so will there even be a significant user base that needs the scene-dependent SDR transform?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2016, 03:57 AM   #80
Richard Paul Richard Paul is offline
Senior Member
 
Oct 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff D View Post
You reckon it'll be that long before 2094 gets added to HEVC?
I think that SMPTE 2094 will get added to the HEVC draft this year but that the next version of HEVC could get released in 2018. Granted they might release the next version of HEVC in 2017 if there are enough companies pushing for it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff D View Post
Of course, if one had their tin-foil hat on, they could argue that by that stage the usage of SDR 4K TVs for primary viewing purposes will have greatly diminished, so will there even be a significant user base that needs the scene-dependent SDR transform?
I think that a good case can be made for dynamic metadata for many years since it allows HDR video to look good on SDR displays which in 2019 will be at least 80% of the market.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > 4K Ultra HD > 4K Ultra HD Players, Hardware and News



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:23 PM.