Back to the Future Trilogy 4K UHD (1985-1990)

[Agent Kay]

Originally Posted by TheHutt

And I suppose these are not the audio commentaries?

Exactly, want someone who owns it to check

[JR Ewing]

Those screen comparison shots look fab. A tad of DNR but still looks so filmic unlike the over sharpened, waxy, digital looking mess the previous release was. The grab with Lorraine and her pal in the dinner I love. Look at their faces. Can't wait to spin these babies.

[Pieter V]

Part 2:

Disc Size: 86,653,332,579 bytes
Protection: AACS2
Extras: Ultra HD, BD-Java
BDInfo: 0.7.5.9

PLAYLIST REPORT:

Name: 00040.MPLS
Length: 1:48:03.310 (h:m:s.ms)
Size: 78,709,782,528 bytes
Total Bitrate: 97.12 Mbps

(*) Indicates included stream hidden by this playlist.

VIDEO:

Codec Bitrate Description
----- ------- -----------
MPEG-H HEVC Video 77296 kbps 2160p / 23.976 fps / 16:9 / Main 10 @ Level 5.1 @ High / 4:2:0 / 10 bits / 4000nits / HDR10+ v1 Profile B / BT.2020
* MPEG-H HEVC Video 7294 kbps (8.62%) 1080p / 23.976 fps / 16:9 / Main 10 @ Level 5.1 @ High / 4:2:0 / 10 bits / 4000nits / Dolby Vision FEL / BT.2020

AUDIO:

Codec Language Bitrate Description
----- -------- ------- -----------
Dolby TrueHD/Atmos Audio English 5050 kbps 7.1 / 48 kHz / 4602 kbps / 24-bit (AC3 Core: 5.1 / 48 kHz / 448 kbps)
DTS Audio Spanish 768 kbps 5.1 / 48 kHz / 768 kbps / 24-bit
DTS Audio French 768 kbps 5.1 / 48 kHz / 768 kbps / 24-bit
Dolby Digital Audio English 192 kbps 2.0 / 48 kHz / 192 kbps
Dolby Digital Audio English 192 kbps 2.0 / 48 kHz / 192 kbps / Dolby Surround

SUBTITLES:

Codec Language Bitrate Description
----- -------- ------- -----------
Presentation Graphics English 44.416 kbps
Presentation Graphics Spanish 33.773 kbps
Presentation Graphics French 36.758 kbps
Presentation Graphics Spanish 0.938 kbps
Presentation Graphics French 1.15 kbps

[jimbean]

Originally Posted by ilovewaterslides

Here we go with a screenshot comparison: (6 caps per film)

Part I: https://screenshotcomparison.com/com...7098/picture:0

Part II: https://screenshotcomparison.com/com...7100/picture:0

Part III: https://screenshotcomparison.com/com...7101/picture:0

Looks good!

[allanp81]

Neither of part 1 and 2 really make me go wow! I guess we just have to accept the fact these films were made in the 80s, used lots of old fashioned special effects and are never going to look that great.

They are an improvement over the regular BDs but only just.

[NLScavenger]

Originally Posted by TheHutt

And I suppose these are not the audio commentaries?

I don't see why one would add a DPL decoding flag to a commentary track.

EDIT: Oh wait, the old BD has commentary tracks with DPL flag.

[Indiana Jones]

Originally Posted by allanp81

Neither of part 1 and 2 really make me go wow! I guess we just have to accept the fact these films were made in the 80s, used lots of old fashioned special effects and are never going to look that great.

They are an improvement over the regular BDs but only just.

The regular Blu-rays are garbage in comparison.

[jerclay]

Originally Posted by allanp81

They are an improvement over the regular BDs but only just.

Way way far from being "only just" actually.

[KENTA]

Originally Posted by allanp81

Neither of part 1 and 2 really make me go wow! I guess we just have to accept the fact these films were made in the 80s, used lots of old fashioned special effects and are never going to look that great.

They are an improvement over the regular BDs but only just.

The regular BDs looked horrible even for 2011 standards and people were rightfully disappointed back then.

This is, just like Scarface, an incredible upgrade to the old BD set.
Universal has been knocking it out of the park with 4k.

[phobicsquirrel]

Originally Posted by TheHutt

Can anyone confirm English 2.0 audio?

Do you not have 5..1 at least?

Bring on the Atmos!!!!

[Indiana Jones]

Originally Posted by phobicsquirrel

Do you not have 5..1 at least?

Bring on the Atmos!!!!

Some want the option of the original theatrical audio which is perfectly understandable especially for films where the remix has replaced certain elements (Terminator/Jaws/Batman)

[TheHutt]

Originally Posted by phobicsquirrel

Do you not have 5..1 at least?

Bring on the Atmos!!!!

5.1 we already had on previous releases. 2.0 we didn't.

[TheBondFan]

I'm sorry but why some people want the worst audio possible ?

[jerclay]

Originally Posted by TheBondFan

I'm sorry but why some people want the worst audio possible ?

As in - the original stereo, as intended by the creators of the film, is the worst audio in your book?

[TheBondFan]

Originally Posted by jerclay

As in - the original stereo, as intended by the creators of the film, is the worst audio in your book?

What I don't understand is that people want the original audio for a few movies and they want Dolby Atmos for other movies.

[Indiana Jones]

Originally Posted by TheBondFan

What I don't understand is that people want the original audio for a few movies and they want Dolby Atmos for other movies.

Some people want the option to enjoy their favourite films with the original theatrical audio mix and some others just want a total remix to make use of their high end audio equipment.

Both requirements are perfectly understandable and releases that cater to both are to be applauded.

[jerclay]

Originally Posted by TheBondFan

What I don't understand is that people want the original audio for a few movies and they want Dolby Atmos for other movies.

Can't say for all people here, but for many of us the original audio, be it even mono, has more value than Atmos just cause it fills all your speakers. On the other hand, if a movie is theatrically released in Atmos, and then that said Atmos is presented on the disc - hell, that's when we want it too!

[TheHutt]

Originally Posted by TheBondFan

I'm sorry but why some people want the worst audio possible ?

I'm sorry, but why do people who can't contribute in any meaningful way to the posted question still feel the urge to participate?

[lgans316]

There is enough space on the disc to fit both the original audio and the remastered audio.

[Fat Phil]

The concept of wanting Atmos on everything is hilarious to me.

Ah, the possibilities - Sidney's Lumet's '12 Angry Men'.....with state of the art, multi-dimensional sound. *Drum roll* Dolby. Atmos. If I can't hear that fan whirring in my overhead speaker then I don't wan' it!!