|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $82.99 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $39.02 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $124.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $35.99 | ![]() $23.79 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $33.49 |
![]() |
#7322 | |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Kris Deering (02-22-2016) |
![]() |
#7323 | ||
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
EDIT: Also "TAxi driver", "Bad boys", "Men in black". I hope all of them get HDR. Frankly, I don't see the point of UHD otherwise. I know I'm kind out of place in this forum, and I beg your forgiveness, but that's my opinion. Lastly, I have one question: How would 4k benefit a 1939 movie? (and to make matters worse, I thought they only had print elements of it, not the o-neg). I seem to remember reading that film stock of the 30s didn't have that much resolution. Quote:
I find all the talk about "director's intent" somewhat disingenous. Considering printing and projecting conditions, it's not like most people attending movie theaters throughout history ever got to see what the director intended anyway (it's been calculated that sometimes actual resolution on screen could be sub-HD). It's not like film projection in many movie theaters ever reached contrast ratios of even LCDs either. But that was how movies were shown. Nobody wants to replicate that though. It's all relative. Also, for most people I think it's going to take some added value like HDR to sell these catalogue titles for the nth time. At least for me. Maybe blu-ray should remain a format for purists, where you already have good looking releases of most movies, and UHD should be pointed at other kinds of audiences. Last edited by jaaguir; 02-24-2016 at 04:14 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#7324 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.amazon.com/Washington-4K-Mastered-UltraViolet-Included-Digibook/dp/B00N5708NE/ Also 4K Mastered blu-ray version of 'Lawrence of Arabia'. http://www.amazon.com/x30A2-x30E9-x30D3-Mastered-Blu-ray/dp/B00FQ6GZ9I/ Last edited by Viking61; 02-22-2016 at 06:38 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7325 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7331 | |
Senior Member
Oct 2007
|
![]() Quote:
I think that for consumer HDR it is 50% complete (30% for movies, 10% for static metadata, and 10% for display requirements) with 50% to go (30% for broadcast and 20% for dynamic metadata). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7332 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
And that's the thing, I fear that politics and back handers and a universal need to get it done as cheaply as possible will result in the poorer systems (or poorer watered-down implementations of systems) getting chosen. 'Twas ever thus, I suppose.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7333 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
Readers please note that the illustrative pic in that hyperlinked post in the above paragraph was simply used to document content from *the viewing event*, rather than being an attempt to illustrate on peoples’ computers the actual picture quality differences between HDR and SDR. Also, I’ll add, so as not to cast aspersions on the innocent, that the executive referred to in the first paragraph was not Bill B. or Don E. Anyway, PQ is more future proof and superior, but HLG is not a *bad* second option at all esp. for the ease of backward compatibility which you mentioned. Favored solutions?... PQ favored for movies where one has the luxury of post production. HLG favored for live content (sports, concerts, etc.) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7334 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
Hence ACES
That said, It wasn’t until Nov.2014 (publication date) that the peak luminance for HDTVs was standardized at 100 nits (+ or – 5 nits) by the Society of Motion Picture & Television Engineers…..and how many years prior to late 2014 have HDTVs been in use in post facilities and consumers’ homes all over the world? Yet somehow people survived. ![]() Things take time. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | JJ (02-23-2016) |
![]() |
#7336 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
Good news everyone. Both WB and Sony's titles are being delivered to Best Buy stores on Thurs 2/25 with Lionsgates titles arriving on Fri 2/26. All launch titles have their street dates listed as 2/11 or 2/12 so there should be no problem buying any of theses as soon as stores receive them. You just need to find one that isn't really strict with what the website says. Life of Pi, Maze Runner, and X-Men DOFP are still currently MIA after a supposed manufacturing delay.
Unfortunately stores only seem to be receiving 2 players each this week to meet the ad minimum for Sunday. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: |
![]() |
#7337 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
Do you know if the ad mentions the UHD movie price? is it locked at $29.99 or will it drop to $27.99 like the previous Fox movies? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7338 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Agent_DVD (02-23-2016) |
![]() |
#7339 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
OK don't kill me, I am only joshin you! My real question to you is based on something I *think* you said. Do these new true 4K HDR releases require more DNR than usual? |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|