|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $22.49 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $16.05 1 day ago
| ![]() $22.49 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.96 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $14.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.99 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.49 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.49 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.95 | ![]() $27.95 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.49 15 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.49 12 hrs ago
|
![]() |
#2401 |
Blu-ray Knight
Apr 2016
Los Angeles
|
![]()
I prefer the 35th Anniversary disc over the 2007 one, but even if someone likes the daytime scenes better in the 2007, the nighttime scenes are devoid of that awesome blue tint that’s present on the 35th Anniversary disc. I need dat blue!
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2402 | |
Power Member
|
![]() Quote:
Edit: I have concluded after 30+ mins that this is the best Halloween has ever looked. Considering how old this movie is, I'll give it a solid 9.5 out of 10 for picture quality. I really like the muted/realistic colors. Last edited by panasonicst60; 09-30-2018 at 09:07 AM. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | clifford finch (09-30-2018), RedZeppelin (10-01-2018) |
![]() |
#2403 |
Blu-ray Knight
Apr 2016
Los Angeles
|
![]()
General question about mono: When I pop in a Blu-ray and choose mono, I think it always says 2.0, not 1.0. Since the only speakers I’m using are my TV’s speakers, am I correct to assume that my TV coverts the mono to dual mono? If I used only a center speaker would my TV say 1.0? Basically I’m wondering if mono tracks on Blu-ray discs are really mono or if they’re really stereo tracks with the mono channel duplicated.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2404 | |
Blu-ray King
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2405 |
Blu-ray Knight
Apr 2016
Los Angeles
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2406 | |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() Quote:
I'll post some waffle about the PQ in a minute but I watched this with the 7.1 (albeit as PCM 5.1 squirted to my TV, no AVR action) and I can live with that. I would prefer the true mono in a heartbeat but the 7.1 isn't the most revisionist remix I've ever heard, I mean all the added thunder during the drive to the looney bin doesn't sound like it belongs and I hate the different stinger for when Michael grabs Annie in the car, but I like that it keeps stuff like the stock gunshot effect for Dr. Loomis shooting Michael at the end. Someone mentioned that this 7.1 keeps the change in pitch during the "speed kills!" scene while the Shout 7.1 levelled this off and that's correct, while the original mono has this pitch change also. So at least this UHD's 7.1 has had one tiny little piece of revisionism changed back again. ![]() My OPPO says "1.0 C", yes. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | bobbyh64 (09-30-2018) |
![]() |
#2408 |
Blu-ray Knight
Apr 2016
Los Angeles
|
![]()
Thank you, Geoff! Seeing someone else type my name really makes me wish I had spelled it with a capital letter. Looks odd.
As for the pitch change, I can remember the first time I watched this film (or close to the first time) and being aware of it and thinking it added some tension to the scene. If it really was a mistake, it’s a pleasant one since it seems to happen at the right moment. And the extra thunder and rain sounds cool, especially in a theater, but it really does sound out of place in this film. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2411 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
That kinda makes more sense to bundle it in as the 35th BD has been OOP for a while in the UK (I know it's also just had a standalone BD release, but still), however it seems more and more likely that Lionsgate ballsed up the US release and pulled the wrong BD master for replication.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2412 |
Banned
|
![]()
Had the pleasure of finally watching this earlier in the evening.
First off, the black 'flicker' or whatever, is definitely from the grain/film stock. The blacks are mildly elevated, I'd assume to show a bit more range in shadow detail, so that's what's creating that effect. It's not a technical issue. It's not an anomaly. It's just a result of what a film like this, from 1978, happens to look like in 2018. Secondly, wow! I love this transfer. You can tell it's a freshly new OCN scan--but hats off to Cundy and Carpenter, who apparently did get to sit in on this new transfer, for staying closer to the 35th anniversary's look, more than the prior home releases, for this disc. It's almost indistinguishable from that blu-ray, in terms of its color reproduction. So, that means you should just stick with the 35th remaster edition then, right? [Show spoiler] The UHD has so much grain--yet still very much resolvable--resulting in a significantly denser, three-dimensional, and sharper image, even much more so than any prior home release to date. With the beautiful wide-angled compositions, slow and steady camera movements, you truly get to appreciate new fine--and distant--detail, in a way that you never could before. There doesn't appear to be any grain management at all, either. While some shots can look soft or out of focus, thanks to anamorphic goodness, this film, from start to finish, has never come close to looking as good as it does on this disc, at least from the perspective of a resolution boost. Again, while the colors remain very identical to the 35th remaster, this is at least a good example of a catalog release getting a noticeable increase in its resolution jump. If you're a fan of this film, which you should be, there's no way I'd pass up on the 4K disc. The PQ of this baby, is honestly just a notch below Sony quality. No joke. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | 4kUltraBD (10-01-2018), andantelise (09-30-2018), Dave_6 (10-01-2018), daycity (09-30-2018), Martoto (09-30-2018), panasonicst60 (09-30-2018), RedZeppelin (10-01-2018), Stefan1 (10-02-2018) |
![]() |
#2414 | |
Senior Member
Oct 2013
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Geoff D (09-30-2018) |
![]() |
#2416 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
I weirdly thought about this as well and the fact he stabbed the knife in with the sharp point down...come on that would never hold the guy up and he'd slide right off! (I still love it as well!)
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2418 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2419 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
Watched this last night, starting off at about midnight right after I'd gone from one American Psycho to another. First off, yes, the pumpkin at the start does look a LOT less orange than the 35th anniversary transfer but something else I noticed is that the geometry of the title sequence was also quite different, the 4K's credits looking fatter and wider which I'll post a photo of at the end.
I've got to say that I spotted no overt flickering whatsoever, maybe just a hint of density flutter in the darkest moments but whatever it is that's making it blatantly flicker on other people's TVs isn't doing it on mine. Goes without saying that I have no contrast enhancers or motion interpolators turned on, but I'll say it anyway. The black levels themselves are indeed quite thin and grey but this is entirely by design as the 35th transfer is very much the same, it's a look unto itself and I'm already used to it from the 35th so no complaints here. The colour loses the slightly warmer tint of the 35th and looks more muted, not "monochromatic" by any stretch but definitely with a slightly more desaturated vibe. It doesn't always track from shot to shot and things like skin tones can actually look a touch fuller while the surroundings are less vibrant, sometimes it's the opposite. Reds look excellent on the 4K though, looking truly red while the 35th veers towards more of an orangey cast owing to that warmer hue. Even something like the tail lights of the car that Michael drives away in are nicely improved, not so much the main shot with the nurse but that final shot of the car zooming into the night, the lights are almost completely faded in the 35th but still have a deep red on the 4K. HDR usage is excellent, not in a "I can see it from space" kinda way but in the way that the flat, bright lighting in the daylight exteriors of the 35th is pulled down into something a bit moodier, revealing a nice little extension to highlight detail in the process. And Nick Castle can rest easy, the reveal of The Shape in the closet still looks wonderful as his ghostly visage is slowly brought up from the darkness. Grain is more abundant than the 35th, mostly due to the grain being clipped out of the brighter spots on that previous SDR transfer, and although the improvement in detail doesn't immediately leap off the screen (if you're familiar with the 35th, anyways) it's dredging up every last bit of acuity that this 35mm anamorphic source can muster. When I was checking the "speed kills!" scene the horizontal lines on PJ Soles' T-shirt are much more finely resolved, for example. Small gains for sure then, ones that some people will have rolled their eyes at when they just read that, but it's not about lines on a T-shirt but more the cumulative effect that this has, the 4K just looks 'tighter' than the 35th. While things like the infamous Halloween hair have indeed been painted out for the 4K it actually has more overt dirt & damage in other areas vs the 35th, with more white specks and marks showing up. Even on the white-on-black location titles there are little white dots baked in to the optical visible against the black background that aren't there on the 35th, which looks clean as a whistle in those shots. New transfer = new clean-up pass with different priorities so I'm not knocking it, just pointing it out is all. Something to add re: the Dolby Vision grey bar problem on Sony sets, I watched this in DV even though all that darkness would inevitably lead to the black bars looking quite grey. Sure enough, in the title sequence the whole image looks raised whereas the 35th Blu-ray titles are deep and dark, letterbox dark, so that glowing pumpkin looks amazing, like it's floating in mid-air in front of me, whereas the pumpkin in DV looked a lot flatter because of the raised blacks. However, when I played the 4K in HDR10 I actually got the exact same thing happen on the title sequence as on the DV, the whole screen still looked sightly raised from black and when I spot-checked several scenes - admittedly having to switch the disc from one player to another - nothing stood out in terms of the black bars being truly blacker or not, and some scenes still had a nice amount of density whenever they had a more contrasty light source in the shot (which is kinda how contrast works). Overall then I'm not as bowled over by this as some people because the 35th anniversary BD was already clearly sourced from camera negative and was already supervised by Dean Cundey and it already looked great (for what it is), but the 4K adds a pleasant HDR pass and refines the colours further, along with whatever spatial detail it can find. The lack of the original mono track may well be a deal-breaker for some but I've had a few years to get used to the 5.1 remix (expanded into 7.1 a few years back) and so it's not as heinous an outcome for me as on other remixes of this ilk, and it doesn't completely throw out the original effects and foley in the process. Couple of pics then, not to compare HDR, sharpness or whatever but just to show the difference in the geometry of the opening titles, the 4K is deffo fatter. If not the exact same frame (difficult on titles) then only a frame or so out. Open them in a new window and tab between them, the difference in size should become obvious. [Show spoiler] Hair today, gone tomorrow (look at the bottom of the image, exact same frame on both): [Show spoiler]
Last edited by Geoff D; 09-30-2018 at 12:49 PM. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | birdztudio (10-20-2018), chip75 (09-30-2018), craigpb (09-30-2018), DAT_JB (10-07-2020), Dave_6 (10-01-2018), daycity (09-30-2018), Dickieduvet (09-30-2018), horroru (09-30-2018), Irrob (09-30-2018), JMEANS (09-30-2018), leoganzi (09-30-2018), maverick22 (09-30-2018), MechaGodzilla (09-30-2018), monstermidget (09-30-2018), RedZeppelin (10-01-2018), ROSS.T.G. (09-30-2018), SonSon III (09-30-2018), Staying Salty (09-30-2018), UpsetSmiley (09-30-2018), woodley56 (10-01-2018) |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|