|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $49.99 | ![]() $29.96 16 hrs ago
| ![]() $36.69 | ![]() $29.99 16 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.73 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.99 | ![]() $34.96 | ![]() $47.99 | ![]() $29.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $80.68 | ![]() $86.13 1 day ago
| ![]() $14.44 1 day ago
|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/4k-3d-201501273992.htm |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Banned
|
![]()
Guess if I want a 4K player, I'll have to keep my old one for 3D too. If I had to pick between 3D and 4K, I'd pick 3D. There is just some jaw-dropping 3D out there that I will never grow tired of.
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Interdimensional (02-03-2015), MarkBirds (01-30-2015), mredman (02-04-2015), Nocturnaloner (04-14-2015) |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
I have to agree. I have a 4k 8700 Samsung that I thoroughly enjoy the 3d viewing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
No Ultra HD players should play 1080p Blu-Ray 3Ds just fine. There are two problems with 4k 3D. One is most 4k televisions are polarized and thus half the resolution of 3D video anyway and an even bigger problem is that the vast majority of 3D movies have 2k digital finishes and a 4k 3D presentation would require an expensive re rendering most studios probably won't invest in. Also 4k 3D can always be added to the spec later just as it was for 1080p Bluray
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Nov 2014
|
![]()
What does the HDR EOTF and static metadata standards they have there mean?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
Heh. I love the way they've keystoned that image to make it look like an off angle photo, when the actual 'leaked' slides are available to see here and have been for a couple of weeks: http://av.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/s...13_683374.html
Anyhoo, this is old news in the 4K BD thread and it's no surprise. I've been saying for the longest time that there's no theatrical or home standard for 4K 3D and, according to the BDA, that situation isn't gonna change any time soon. Me, I'd take 4K flat every time. I do love 3D, really I do, but I've never been able to see it at it's best on the various 3D TVs that I've bought over the years (passive is great but half res, active looks better but has sooooo much crosstalk) and wearing glasses already makes wearing the extra goggles less than comfortable. If this is the beginning of the end, then so be it. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Dec 2014
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Nov 2014
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|