|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $45.00 52 min ago
| ![]() $82.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $22.95 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.99 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $41.99 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $26.59 52 min ago
| ![]() $20.99 52 min ago
| ![]() $34.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $19.96 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $101.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $7.00 3 hrs ago
|
![]() |
#41 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
Have not bought a movie on DVD since 2003 but there used to be two versions available for many titles (anamorphic and P&S). Some titles had anamorphic on one side and P&S on the other. At any rate, it is like you say, it is not a simple choice between BD & DVD for many titles. And if the studios should ever release titles in anamorphic on BD then we will have another choice to make.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#42 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Anyway, since the trades and tech bloggers seem focused on 300 GB Blu-ray discs for 4K home media (seemingly downplaying the efficiency of advanced compression schemes), these are some alternative views, the later being from an Apple fanboy who ends the article with the infamous “Blu-ray is just a bag of hurt” phrase. http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2013/07/...o-save-the-cd/ http://blogs.computerworld.com/stora...t-apple-doesnt Last edited by Penton-Man; 07-31-2013 at 06:16 PM. Reason: typo |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
Not "instead", especially if you’re talking movies (as essentially only a couple Directors with almost unlimited studio-backed resources are currently involving themselves in HFR feature motion pictures, not to mention that many post houses are hoping it (HFR) DOESN’T succeed because they will then be forced to make some upgrades), I would agree that support of 4K @ 60 Hz in addition to traditional 4K @ 24 fps would show good foresight.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#44 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
It's great to see Sony & Panasonic continuing a half century of optical disc research & development. In the meantime I hope that when the BDA (Blu ray Disc Association) meets for adding new specifications that BDXL for commercial use is part of the new specifications.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#46 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
Why stop at 128 GB for that? 200 GB discs were successfully developed and tested even by Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, as per repeated personal communications between me and then President Worldwide Ben Feingold (who played a critical role in Sony's Blu-ray push back in the day - http://www.prnewswire.com/news-relea...-53119447.html )
For documentation as to around when it all began, scroll down and see the introduction in the paper entitled “Use of grating in reading multi-layer disc to reduce amount of interlayer cross-talk” here - http://spie.org/Documents/Conference...dline-2008.pdf If I recall correctly, seems to me TDK also developed their own brand of 200 GB Blu-ray disc years ago too. |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
Blu-ray Samurai
May 2007
Indianapolis
|
![]()
What I haven't found any information about, is what kind of beam is going to be used. A long time ago I read an article about a company that was developing a disc with a very high capacity. It didn't use a laser, but a very narrow focused particle beam. I think the company went belly up before they finished the product.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
Blu-ray Samurai
May 2007
Indianapolis
|
![]()
The company was Norsam.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|