|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $82.99 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $23.60 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.94 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.68 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $20.18 56 min ago
| ![]() $28.10 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $33.54 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $39.02 10 hrs ago
|
![]() |
#401 |
Blu-ray Ninja
Oct 2008
|
![]()
I assume Sony knows what they're talking about, but I don't really see why HDR would exacerbate grain...
![]() And HDR is, at least in principle, not a gimmick. If you're a photographer, you probably know that trying to capture how a contrasty scene looks to the eye can be a constant source of frustration. Your eye has no problem seeing, for example, both the unlit interior of a house and the sunny day outside, but on a regular display, reproducing this requires you to do heavy-duty contrast flattening. An HDR display and signal path would let you produce an image that plays much better to your eye's logarithmic response to light. |
![]() |
![]() |
#402 | |
Member
Oct 2009
-
-
|
![]() Quote:
You're right, I shouldn't call HDR a gimmick. What I find "gimmicky" is applying it to movies that were shot with a 50 nits peak white or so in mind. What happened to accurately replicating the original theatrical experience? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#403 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#404 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
Once i turned off my tvs DNR, alot of the detail came back that i was missing. and along with that came back noise and grain (which i hate). spiderman and hitman agent 47 are especially grainy. if this player was applying DNR they wouldnt be anywhere near as bad. turning my DNR on on the tv helps out ALOT with grain, almost disappears completely but it causes motion blurring and texture loss. im hoping that future 4k players have advanced noise reducers that you can toggle and eliminate that flickering noise. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#405 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | ray0414 (03-15-2016) |
![]() |
#406 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#407 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#408 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
And later corroborated with experience involving different projects…..https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread...e#post11956225 |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | ray0414 (03-15-2016) |
![]() |
#409 | |
Expert Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#410 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
it's still early in the game, the studio's are like kids with a new toy, I'm sure we will see non-HDR titles at some point.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#411 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
Remember this freebie from early 2011 with traditional Blu-rays…. https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread...ls#post4453123
You or anyone else are free to try the same code with your Sony Ultra HD Blu-ray discs in order to enhance your picture quality viewing experience. |
![]() |
![]() |
#412 |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]()
Dem WB titles..
![]() Without an HDR set, most are near pointless. Latest underwhelming film watched of late was "Pan" They at least released some good movies but slapping a 4K Ultra on the disc & charging at least twice the amount of the BDs is just wrong. TSG, or TGS Entertainment.. I have been seeing tons of these mostly from Fox I believe.. Watched 3 minutes into "Wild" & those 3 minutes look better then the entire run of "Pan's" film length. ![]() Rant over. |
![]() |
![]() |
#413 | |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() Quote:
They'll still have new movies with which they can keep the HDR flame burning bright (quite literally) but when more knowledge filters down to the UHD user base - who are already so used to seeing these ultra-clean ultra-dynamic UHD HDR presentations - that film grain and a non-eye-searing DR isn't A Bad Thing™ then I think the studios will be more confident in releasing such product. [edit] Wind the clock back 10 years and HD itself was in the exact same position. The bespoke demo videos in store promised super-sharp super-colourful images round the clock and Blu-ray and HD DVD were initially tailored to that preconception, that everything had to be smooth and shiny and as far away from dat nasty grainy film as humanly possible. Just as it took time for people to understand that not every film will be a knockout in HD, the same will apply to UHD. "The more things change..." etc etc Last edited by Geoff D; 03-15-2016 at 02:02 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#414 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
I'm sure you're right Geoff. Otherwise the catalogs are going to be almost nonexistent in the long run and we won't be seeing boutique or other small labels releasing catalog either (can't imagine Criterion titles with HDR). I'm looking forward to seeing some of those.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#415 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
Exactly mate. In the age of the boutique label doing a roaring trade - mostly on existing transfers supplied to them from the licensor - there simply won't be the money for new HDR passes on everything.
If Criterion get into UHD Blu (miracles do happen, they've just announced they're doing UK BD releases in partnership with Sony!) then I can see them getting HDR on a newer transfer done for them by Sony or whoever, but if they really start delving into the 4K back catalogue of existing content then that stuff will be mastered in SDR by default. |
![]() |
![]() |
#416 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#417 | |
Power Member
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#418 | |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | dvdmike (03-15-2016) |
![]() |
#419 | |
Member
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#420 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
Sure, I still think regular Blu-ray is capable of absolutely stunning film-like imagery. But my point was geared towards the wider consumer conception of these shiny new formats, not for the smaller band of learned enthusiasts on forums like this.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|