|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $32.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $28.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.95 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.99 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $45.00 1 day ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $12.49 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $82.99 | ![]() $27.95 1 day ago
| ![]() $12.49 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $14.97 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $26.59 1 day ago
|
![]() |
#3581 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
http://news.panasonic.com/press/news...n150106-4.html Then, there is this: "To date, Samsung and Panasonic are the only two manufacturers to have presented Ultra HD Blu-ray players. Panasonic's is a prototype model that doesn't actually work yet, whereas Samsung's functional version is capable of playing Ultra HD Blu-ray discs when connected to a TV. The Samsung UBD-K8500 also offers support for HDR (High Dynamic Range), HFR (High Frame Rate – 60 fps), HEVC (H.265), 3D and 10-bit color." http://www.digitalversus.com/blu-ray...16-n45199.html For now, they are just prototypes and that includes the Samsung. At least Samsung has a model number. I didn't see Panasonic arguing when Samsung claimed to have the "World's First Ultra HD Blu-ray player", even though Panasonic made the same claim back in January. I wouldn't pay too much attention to "functionality" of these prototypes until ecosystem standards are established by the UHD Alliance and the manufacturers have all the necessary licensing. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3583 |
Special Member
|
![]()
I have been thinking about this all week now, I'm really angry, looking at the even bigger picture with every passing day that Ultra HD Blu-ray is not on the market, 8K keeps moving back as well. Looking at the UHD Alliances most recent press release dated August 31st they expect Ultra HD TV shipments to jump from 96 million in 2019 to over 300 million in 2019, that may be true but they are the dates I have heard mentioned that 8K would be available, granted this was back in 2009 but it's disheartening none the less.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3584 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
How many logos do we need? There's one that's no good as it is, my point exactly! Last edited by bailey1987; 09-10-2015 at 07:15 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3585 |
Special Member
|
![]()
We all knew that this logo was useless back when it was announced, so why bother?
http://www.digitaleurope.org/Service...logos/UHD.aspx |
![]() |
![]() |
#3588 |
Special Member
|
![]()
I have just seen this at HDTV Test:
Update 4 September 2015: A Samsung spokesperson has revealed that the UBD-K8500 may provisionally be launched at its European Forum in Barcelona in February 2016, with hardware arriving in stores end of April. http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/samsu...1509034166.htm 8+5=13 go figure. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3589 | |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | PeterTHX (09-10-2015) |
![]() |
#3590 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
What consumer appetite? The general consumer is showing little to no interest in 4K or HDR for that matter. The only interest is coming from us HT geeks!! Sony is acting like everyone and anyone is falling over themselves to get 4K tv's when that simply is not true and I happen to be one of those people! Although I will admit HDR does interest me a little. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3591 | |
Member
May 2008
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3593 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
The complexity is offputting at the moment, for me, anyway. I thought it would be a simple task to buy a new receiver this year, but now forced to learn about HDMI 2.2 or whatever will be needed. I gather I can wait for a player with two ports so I can use a standard HDMI 2.0 amp for but this doesn't seem as elegant and I forsee issues. I suppose I'll just wait a few months.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3594 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3595 |
Blu-ray Guru
Aug 2007
|
![]()
Ditto for my in-laws. No interest in 4K, but they wanted a big, new TV from a brand they had confidence in, so a Sony 4K it was. You almost have to go out of your way to not get a 4K if you're buying a new set over a certain size.
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Geoff D (09-10-2015), reanimator (09-11-2015) |
![]() |
#3596 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
Surely there'll come a point when, like 1080, it simply won't be possible to buy a TV that isn't 4k?
...and then we can come in and complain about people watching DVDs on them. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | FilmFreakosaurus (09-10-2015) |
![]() |
#3597 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
The reality is that whether consumers are interested in 4K or not, most of the remaining manufacturers aside from Samsung have a majority of 4K sets in their line. While Samsung is also big into 4K, 59% of their line and 61% of their listed models are still 1080p sets, but that's mostly because they have such a large line (73 lines in 218 model sizes) and much of that is prior year models. What would truly interesting to see is sales data on each model, but that's not available to mere mortals. While neophyte consumers may not know what UHD or 4K is, when they walk into a showroom, they ask the usual stupid question, "what's the best set?" And if they do that, they're going to be steered towards 4K. Also, since 4K is "higher" than 1080 (if they can figure that out), they'll think it's better because it's a bigger number. You know, "my amp goes to 11" and all that. If I were a salesperson and they asked that of me, since I'm such a wiseass, I'd probably refer them to Samsung's 105" 5120x2160 set which has now been discounted to only $120,000. "That's within your price range, right? Oh, it's not? I thought you wanted the best set. Oh, okay, how about this JS9500. It's smaller, only 88", but it's discounted 25% to only $20,000 - it's a real bargain and if you buy it, I'll throw in a free Blu-ray disc from the $5 bin, but don't tell anyone, okay? What? Oh, that's no good either? Excuse me. So I guess you don't really want the best set, do you? You want the best set you can afford, I understand. What's your budget? $700? Oh, okay. Well here's this 32" 720p set. What? Is it the best? Of course it is. Yes, certainly you can tell your friends that you purchased the best TV." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3598 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
Also, in a chain store situation, since they crank up the brightness and contrast so high anyway, HDR might actually look worse if it can be perceived at all. I went to see MI5 at a theater equipped for Dolby Vision. I had forgotten that Dolby Vision is also, in essence, HDR until afterwards. While the picture looked very good, I didn't necessarily perceive the HDR. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3599 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
We don't need to survey "a large body of consumers" to confirm for you a truth which is obvious to the rest of us. We draw a simple and very obvious conclusion based upon what we have all observed for years. Of the dwindling number of people who buy disc media, we know that most of them buy DVDs by a significant margin...three or four to one over Blu-ray. That's not the opinion of me and my two friends; it's shown in numbers published weekly for the better part of a decade. Would any reasonable person believe that these same consumers have developed an interest in 4k and HDR? C'mon. Don't be a butt pain by thinking you need a survery to understand the common sense that has been staring us in the face. We live in a world where convenience trumps everything and a huge majority of disc buyers purchase standard definition discs to watch on their high definition TVs. Want a survery? Stand on the street corner and ask the first 100 people you see if they are interested in 4K and HDR...then let us know if you even find 3 people who know what the heck you are talking about. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3600 | |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]() Quote:
If manufacturing only pumps out 4K sets from 26" & beyond while declining in price then it becomes more about mainstream attention for 4K & Native 4K Sources from that point for videophiles & newer generations. Sure generations past don't give a crap about anything better then DVD & people keep bringing up that format is still king (including my folks) because it's about cost & their internal disregard that anything could possibly look better than 480p but what it's really about is they only care about the content that is in front of their eyes. I'm not worried at all about 4K TVs surviving. Regardless of 4K content, all other sources outshine native 1080 sets on 4K sets, especially current gen console gaming systems. All Blu-ray's upscale great too. People who want UHD now need to chill. IMO, it's only purpose will be to drive the TV market forward faster with better tech to make us go DAM! That looks impressive! |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
4k blu-ray, ultra hd blu-ray |
|
|