2025-2026 NFL Season Thread - Page 3309 - Blu-ray Forum

dcowboy7 · 01-12-2016, 09:38 PM

If its sd/oak who moves to nfc & vice versa ?

Ray O. Blu · 01-12-2016, 10:12 PM

God, I hope the Raiders don't come back here!

Carson is a bad location for a stadium.

I hope a Chargers/Rams in Inglewood deal gets voted in.

RageATL · 01-12-2016, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rblu-Dblu

Even without his history he should've been suspended. From my point of view he clearly put his shoulder out there with the intent of hitting Brown in the head.

As much as I loathe the guy, I disagree completely...it was a so called "bang-bang" play.

dcowboy7 · 01-12-2016, 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ray O. Blu

I hope a Chargers/Rams in Inglewood deal gets voted in.

Looks like a lock.

walruswarrior · 01-12-2016, 10:36 PM

Tony208 · 01-12-2016, 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rblu-Dblu

Even without his history he should've been suspended. From my point of view he clearly put his shoulder out there with the intent of hitting Brown in the head.

To use some car analogies, he got clipped and it was not a full on collision like most other head shots.

Ever angle your shoulder when walking or running past someone? It's something I do all the time so I don't lose momentum. That might or might not have happened here, but no one is going to give him the benefit of the doubt.

Burfict is no doubt a dirty player for some of the things he's done, but on this one I really think it's a bang bang play.

Moviefan1203 · 01-12-2016, 10:55 PM

LA is going to have A LOT of season ticket packages to sell.

atfree · 01-12-2016, 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dcowboy7

If its sd/oak who moves to nfc & vice versa ?

Looks like its SD/St Louis to LA, Raiders back to Bay area with league working to find them a new site for stadium....if it happens like this, no realignment will be needed.

rickah88 · 01-12-2016, 11:00 PM

Can someone explain why the Bungles didn't just take three knees, make Pitt use all their timeouts, kick a very makeable FG and give the ball back to Pitt needing a TD to win with ~1min to go? Instead of handing off to Hill who was running directly into a line of defenders only looking to strip the ball?
Despite being loaded with a bunch of head cases, the Cincy defense was actually playing a very good game for the first 59 mins.

Ray O. Blu · 01-12-2016, 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dcowboy7

Looks like a lock.

That'll be awesome.

I've worked on most of the major L.A. sports and entertainment complexes and if and when a stadium is to be built, I'll get to do the electrical and lighting on that one, also.

Would mean a lot of jobs for a lot of folks here in the L.A. area.

RageATL · 01-12-2016, 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rickah88

Can someone explain why the Bungles didn't just take three knees, make Pitt use all their timeouts, kick a very makeable FG and give the ball back to Pitt needing a TD to win with ~1min to go? Instead of handing off to Hill who was running directly into a line of defenders only looking to strip the ball?

Despite being loaded with a bunch of head cases, the Cincy defense was actually playing a very good game for the first 59 mins.

I wondered the same thing, why even run the risk of a fumble which is exactly what happened. That game was truly a comedy of errors.

Moviefan1203 · 01-13-2016, 12:27 AM

So basically St. Louis offered up $400ish million in public funds for a stadium, and they lost their team. Oakland didn't do jack, and they keep their team as well as get NFL money for a new stadium. How does that seem logical?

Beefbowl · 01-13-2016, 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moviefan1203

So basically St. Louis offered up $400ish million in public funds for a stadium, and they lost their team. Oakland didn't do jack, and they keep their team as well as get NFL money for a new stadium. How does that seem logical?

Blame it on the owners

sycro · 01-13-2016, 01:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moviefan1203

So basically St. Louis offered up $400ish million in public funds for a stadium, and they lost their team. Oakland didn't do jack, and they keep their team as well as get NFL money for a new stadium. How does that seem logical?

Owners aren't logical.

Since the stadium won't be ready until 2017, I wish the Rams would still be in St Louis next year. They play the Falcons at home

jwerk · 01-13-2016, 01:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rickah88

Can someone explain why the Bungles didn't just take three knees, make Pitt use all their timeouts, kick a very makeable FG and give the ball back to Pitt needing a TD to win with ~1min to go? Instead of handing off to Hill who was running directly into a line of defenders only looking to strip the ball?
Despite being loaded with a bunch of head cases, the Cincy defense was actually playing a very good game for the first 59 mins.

Very easy to second guess after the fact, but that's way too passive for me. I have no problem keeping your fate in your own hands and trying to win the game on offense instead of defense. Big Ben was coming back, Bryant didn't have a lot of yards but looked pretty explosive when given the chance, and 1 minute is a lot of time.

RageATL · 01-13-2016, 02:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sycro

Owners aren't logical.

Since the stadium won't be ready until 2017, I wish the Rams would still be in St Louis next year. They play the Falcons at home

I read 2019, but they will be playing in LA next season (The Coliseum, I presume?).

Keep in mind this move was essentially telegraphed a few years back when Gronke purchased the land in Englewood...it was just a matter of time, he forced their hand. In addition, a few local counties owe a considerable amount of money on Edward Jones stadium. I also have to wonder if the recent civil unrest in and around the STL area factored into the decision to move.

R3P0 · 01-13-2016, 02:13 AM

Damn St Louis fans got screwed

Batman1980 · 01-13-2016, 02:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R3P0

Damn St Louis fans got screwed

People in Missouri that aren't Chiefs fans watch NFL football?

eagle20 · 01-13-2016, 02:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R3P0

Damn St Louis fans got screwed

That's what happened here in LA when both the Raiders and Rams left we didn't have a team for a long long long time

West E · 01-13-2016, 03:12 AM

Raiders kind of belong in Oakland but the team with the worst stadium AND with the least help from their city comes in third? Thats a little odd. They could move to San Diego into the Chargers' current stadium and it would be a huge upgrade.

Glad the Rams are back in LA tho. They belong there. When i was a kid the Raiders were in LA so i kind of wanted them to go back but when has the NFL ever sided with us? LOL.

View Poll Results: Which team will win Super Bowl LIV
San Francisco 49ers	28	50.91%
Kansas City Chiefs	27	49.09%
Voters: 55. You may not vote on this poll

01-12-2016, 09:38 PM	#66161
dcowboy7 Blu-ray Knight Top contributor Member since:Feb 2009 Location:Pequannock, NJ 4K collection:7 Blu-ray collection:112 Trading Score:11	If its sd/oak who moves to nfc & vice versa ?

01-12-2016, 10:12 PM	#66162
Ray O. Blu Blu-ray Ninja Top contributor Member since:Sep 2008 Location:The £ßÇ 4K collection:- Blu-ray collection:- Blu-ray reviews:50 Trading Score:6	God, I hope the Raiders don't come back here! Carson is a bad location for a stadium. I hope a Chargers/Rams in Inglewood deal gets voted in.

01-12-2016, 10:36 PM	#66165
walruswarrior Blu-ray Prince Member since:Sep 2008 Blu-ray collection:1549 DVD collection:40 Trading Score:234

01-12-2016, 10:55 PM	#66167
Moviefan1203 Blu-ray Prince Top contributor Member since:Oct 2008 Location:Pennsylvania, USA Blu-ray reviews: 6 Trading Score:45	LA is going to have A LOT of season ticket packages to sell.

01-12-2016, 11:00 PM	#66169
rickah88 Blu-ray Grand Duke Top contributor Member since:May 2010 Location:Columbia, MD 4K collection:- Blu-ray collection:- DVD collection:- Trading Score:93	Can someone explain why the Bungles didn't just take three knees, make Pitt use all their timeouts, kick a very makeable FG and give the ball back to Pitt needing a TD to win with ~1min to go? Instead of handing off to Hill who was running directly into a line of defenders only looking to strip the ball? Despite being loaded with a bunch of head cases, the Cincy defense was actually playing a very good game for the first 59 mins.

01-13-2016, 12:27 AM	#66172
Moviefan1203 Blu-ray Prince Top contributor Member since:Oct 2008 Location:Pennsylvania, USA Blu-ray reviews: 6 Trading Score:45	So basically St. Louis offered up $400ish million in public funds for a stadium, and they lost their team. Oakland didn't do jack, and they keep their team as well as get NFL money for a new stadium. How does that seem logical?

01-13-2016, 02:13 AM	#66177
R3P0 Blu-ray Duke Member since:Jun 2008 Blu-ray collection:46 Trading Score:1	Damn St Louis fans got screwed

01-13-2016, 03:12 AM	#66180
West E Blu-ray Knight Member since:Jul 2011	Raiders kind of belong in Oakland but the team with the worst stadium AND with the least help from their city comes in third? Thats a little odd. They could move to San Diego into the Chargers' current stadium and it would be a huge upgrade. Glad the Rams are back in LA tho. They belong there. When i was a kid the Raiders were in LA so i kind of wanted them to go back but when has the NFL ever sided with us? LOL.

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals