Sony "Mastered in 4K" Blu-ray Titles May 14 and July 16 - Page 22 - Blu-ray Forum

Geoff D · 04-09-2013, 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 42041

Ghostbusters, between being optical-heavy, shot on anamorphic lenses and first generation high-speed film, is unlikely to ever give Avatar a run for its money, but for my taste, the room for improvement is more than "marginal".

The one thing that struck me about Ghostbusters on BD was the distinct lack of grain during many of the opticals, usually it's the other way around! The effects were mostly shot on 65mm and printed down to 35mm, which is why they look so much better than the native anamorphic footage.

Hopefully they've tamed the contrast and colour saturation on the new transfer, IMO both of these things were liable for exacerbating the grain on the BD. I saw the movie projected at 2K at the BFI IMAX a couple of years ago, and it didn't look like the overcooked blown-out home video version; it looked like a pristine 35mm print. Even on the giant IMAX screen it still had less visible grain than the Blu-ray, and I couldn't spot the garbage mattes around the terror dogs either. Fingers crossed for a similar experience with the new transfer...

AngelGraves13 · 04-09-2013, 01:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geoff D

Skyfall *was* finished at 4K though, in spite of the Alexa's 2.8K image. It's not the first Sony upscale either, the effects shots in Spider-Man 3 were done at 2K and uprezzed for the final 4K DI.

Yeah I heard that a 4K master was created for Skyfall, but when true 4K masters arrive it will look pretty weak next to it. Hell it was even given the IMAX treatment.

The Amazing Spider-Man should look amazing as it was all done at 4K unlike Spider-Man 3. Maybe the film won't look as dark and might have more color with this new 4K Master Series.

HeavyHitter · 04-09-2013, 01:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kryptonic

It was a failure. Of those 17 years that it was officially a format, it was never popular and never really viable. They were too cumbersome and expensive.

It was a successful niche. It was never meant for the masses - VHS was for that.

If there is a ever a 4K disc format (I can only hope) it too will be a niche although broader than LD but still not like BD.

Drewbee87 · 04-09-2013, 01:50 AM

A 4K disc would probably be $40 or $50 a movie. I don't even want to think of how much a TV show would be....

HD Goofnut · 04-09-2013, 02:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drewbee87

A 4K disc would probably be $40 or $50 a movie. I don't even want to think of how much a TV show would be....

Aren't many new and recent TV shows shot in 2K anyway?

Drewbee87 · 04-09-2013, 02:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HD Goofnut

Aren't many new and recent TV shows shot in 2K anyway?

IDK, I'm not saying it's for sure going to happen. lol I'm just thinking if it does, the price will probably be ridiculous.

Mr. Movie Fan · 04-09-2013, 02:19 AM

I wouldn't expect Spider-Man 2 to be given a 4K remaster.
That movie finished in a 2k DI.

metaridley · 04-09-2013, 02:21 AM

Personally, I'm not upgrading until we get hologram discs.

HD Goofnut · 04-09-2013, 02:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fanboyz

I wouldn't expect Spider-Man 2 to be given a 4K remaster.
That movie finished in a 2k DI.

That's not true. It was a 4K DI: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0316654/...ef_=tt_dt_spec

HD Goofnut · 04-09-2013, 02:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by metaridley

Personally, I'm not upgrading until we get hologram discs.

Might as well wait for flying cars, transporters, and food replicators then.

42041 · 04-09-2013, 02:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HD Goofnut

That's not true. It was a 4K DI: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0316654/...ef_=tt_dt_spec

It's actually the first 4K DI, I believe. The effects shots were done at 2K however.
Given how it looks though, it's possible the HD transfer was not made from the DI, but from a filmout. That was the case for some early DI films, where doing it from film rather than the DI fit into existing workflows better. I don't have the disc but if there are black dust specs or telecine wobble on it (it's been years since I rented it and I wasn't looking) it's not from the DI.

metaridley · 04-09-2013, 02:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HD Goofnut

Might as well wait for flying cars, transporters, and food replicators then.

Something tells me those wouldn't be as complicated.

chip75 · 04-09-2013, 02:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HD Goofnut

Aren't many new and recent TV shows shot in 2K anyway?

There was a article a few weeks back saying a few shows were getting the 4K treatment Breaking Bad was one of them, I can't remember the rest.

AngelGraves13 · 04-09-2013, 03:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fanboyz

I wouldn't expect Spider-Man 2 to be given a 4K remaster.
That movie finished in a 2k DI.

Incorrect. It was the first 4K DI that E-Film ever did. I remember it being a big deal.

SethRex · 04-09-2013, 04:33 AM

Do you need a 4K tv for these, or are they capable of playing on current TVs? Sorry if it's been asked before.

Drewbee87 · 04-09-2013, 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SethRex

Do you need a 4K tv for these, or are they capable of playing on current TVs? Sorry if it's been asked before.

VaporX94 · 04-09-2013, 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SethRex

Do you need a 4K tv for these, or are they capable of playing on current TVs? Sorry if it's been asked before.

"sourced from pristine 4K masters and presented at high-bitrate 1080p resolution"

Taken from the OP. They're just from 4k masters, and just regular 1080p resolution. Hopefully people don't think these are actually at 4k resolution... I don't expect the prices to be any different than regular blu-rays, either.

blu-ray_girl_fan · 04-09-2013, 04:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SethRex

Do you need a 4K tv for these, or are they capable of playing on current TVs? Sorry if it's been asked before.

SethRex · 04-09-2013, 04:59 AM

Alright. That is my bad, my 'dumb ass moment'. I'm sorry Blu-Ray_Girl_Fan, I did not mean to upset you.

I'll wait for reviews before buying the 3 I intend to double dip on.

AngelGraves13 · 04-09-2013, 08:04 AM

If anything they should have much better color.

The colorspace for UHD is much larger than HD.

04-09-2013, 01:50 AM	#424
Drewbee87 Blu-ray Ninja Top contributor Member since:Dec 2009 4K collection:8 Blu-ray collection:266 Trading Score:7	A 4K disc would probably be $40 or $50 a movie. I don't even want to think of how much a TV show would be....

04-09-2013, 02:19 AM	#427
Mr. Movie Fan Banned Top contributor Member since:Feb 2010 Location:St. Paul Minnesota Home Theater Gallery:4 4K collection:1203 Blu-ray collection:6571 DVD collection:266 Trading Score:1	I wouldn't expect Spider-Man 2 to be given a 4K remaster. That movie finished in a 2k DI.

04-09-2013, 02:21 AM	#428
metaridley Banned Member since:Feb 2012	Personally, I'm not upgrading until we get hologram discs.

04-09-2013, 04:33 AM	#435
SethRex Blu-ray Ninja Member since:Jan 2009 4K collection:6 Blu-ray collection:7 Digital collection:1 Blu-ray reviews: 6 Trading Score:127	Do you need a 4K tv for these, or are they capable of playing on current TVs? Sorry if it's been asked before.

04-09-2013, 04:59 AM	#439
SethRex Blu-ray Ninja Member since:Jan 2009 4K collection:6 Blu-ray collection:7 Digital collection:1 Blu-ray reviews: 6 Trading Score:127	Alright. That is my bad, my 'dumb ass moment'. I'm sorry Blu-Ray_Girl_Fan, I did not mean to upset you. I'll wait for reviews before buying the 3 I intend to double dip on.

04-09-2013, 08:04 AM	#440
AngelGraves13 Senior Member Top contributor Member since:Feb 2011 Location:North Hollywood, CA 4K collection:1654 Blu-ray collection:3870 DVD collection:77 iTunes collection:267	If anything they should have much better color. The colorspace for UHD is much larger than HD.

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals