|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $45.00 21 hrs ago
| ![]() $82.99 | ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $27.95 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.95 1 day ago
| ![]() $22.49 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $18.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $23.60 1 day ago
|
![]() |
#76481 | |
Junior Member
Jun 2013
-
-
-
|
![]() Quote:
1) Fish Tank 2) Sweetie 3) Fat Girl 4) Tiny Furniture 5) White Material I'm spending a small fortune on this 50% sale, picked up the Jean Pierre Gorin Eclipse along with a ton of other blus. Anyone wanna recommend other eclipse sets? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#76482 |
Blu-ray reviewer
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#76483 | |
Junior Member
|
![]() Quote:
Thanks for the review, I'm going to read the book soon and If I like it will most definitely buy the film. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#76485 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#76486 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
I hope they end up extending the sale by a week like they previously did so The Devil's Backbone will be included. I was disappointed to see it wasn't marked down as happened in a previous sale with the titles from week after the end of the sale also included.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#76487 | |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#76490 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
I cannot remember if they extended it last time or a previous time which was somewhat recent, but they had extended before.
Last time they made a few of the pre-orders available at the sale price. I really don't know why Criterion always sets release dates at the end of the month, particularly for what will be the most in demand titles. It doesn't look good, but I'm hoping for something that will allow us to grab TDB for the discount. |
![]() |
![]() |
#76492 | |||
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I always cringe whenever someone says John Carpenter's film is a "remake" of the earlier film, NO it wasn't a goddamn remake of the Howard Hawks film they have little in common other than alien and snow, sure there 2 homages to the earlier film like the circle of men and the opening title sequence but those are just it in little similarities. It's so different than the "original" that it's a remake IN NAME ONLY. They share a name but everything like the location (one in the north pole and the other in the south pole), the characters and their backgrounds, the discovery and origin of the spaceship, the discovery of the alien, the nature/methods of the alien (one is a dumbed down killer vegetable sentinel lifeform that is kind of like a vampire as it sucked blood but also resembled a Frankenstein monster and a lumbering beast that could reproduce itself but it wasn't the story's imitator where the other is a shapeshifiting parasitic organism that could imitate other lifeforms by cell structure) etc. are both very different and apart from each other. They are 2 separate and completely different yet independent adaptations of the original source material John W. Campbell Jr.s 1938 novella "Who Goes There" which is a scary short story and one of my favorite novellas. The 1951 film is a very good film on it's own but in reality and truth it's a sanitized bastardization as that was totally NOTHING like the short story it was suppose to be based on as it's one of the worst book to film adaptations of all time on par with Lawnmower Man or whatever. Carpenter's film is a standalone film that is an EXCELLENT and faithful adaptation of the short story as it's not a remake, it's a re-adaptation. It's like saying I Am Legend is a remake of Omega Man and that Omega Man is a remake of Last man on Earth or saying PJ's LOTR is a remake of Bakshi's film, nope, they are all based on the same source material but their plots are different. Even John Carpenter has stated many times in interviews that he may had grew up with the 1951 film but he's a bigger fan of the short story. He also stated that back in 1981 the studio wanted to do a remake of The Thing from Another World but Carpenter was offered it but he refused to remake the earlier film as he didn't want to compete with Hawks who is one of his idols, he stated he wanted to go back to the source material which began it all as that's preciously what he did. He stated his film is not a remake of the earlier film but a re-adaptation that is it's own film. Carpenter's film is faithful to the source material, Hawks was not. Remakes and re-adaptations are 2 very different things, remakes USUALLY refer ONLY to original screenplays/films that aren't based on source material like for example The Blob or Ocean's 11 or The Hills Have Eyes, TRUE remakes as they are based on original screenplays. Re-adaptation means another adaptation of source material (books/novellas/comics) like The Thing, I Am Legend, Omega Man, Frankenstein, Dracula, War of the Worlds, Girl with the Dragon Tattoo etc. and Carpenter's film is by far the definitive cinematic representation of Campbell's story. Here's a suggestion for Criterion on BD: City of Lost Children How about it? now this would look and sound great on HD and with new extras. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#76497 |
Moderator
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#76499 | |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Criterion Collection | Wish Lists | Chushajo | 26 | 08-14-2025 12:45 PM |
Criterion Collection? | Newbie Discussion | ChitoAD | 68 | 01-02-2019 10:14 PM |
Criterion Collection Question. . . | Blu-ray Movies - North America | billypoe | 31 | 01-18-2009 02:52 PM |
The Criterion Collection goes Blu! | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | bferr1 | 164 | 05-10-2008 02:59 PM |
|
|