|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $39.95 53 min ago
| ![]() $74.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $124.99 53 min ago
| ![]() $24.97 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $28.99 53 min ago
| ![]() $35.99 22 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.99 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $44.99 |
![]() |
#4521 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
So, today’s addendum to yesterday’s prelude posted on the bottom of the last page….
Addendum With permission, I’ll quote one friendly inquirer thru personal communication - “Penton, is it at all dependent on the camera or is the camera aspect totally independent and is it just a color grading thing” . Answered simply, motion pictures shot traditionally on film (celluloid) have the capability of consensus Hollywood studio ‘HDR’ range as the film itself is not a limiter (~ 16 f-stops). Older generation digital cameras could only record 9-10 stops, but improvements in sensor design and log encoding schemes have vastly improved the ability of current generation digital (Sony F65/55, Alexa, Red Epic/Dragon, etc.) cameras to record dynamic range in the range of 13-14 stops, which qualifies more as ‘HDR’ (of course the HDR remastering is also dependent upon the content creators having access to more raw-ish files upstream from the DCP). Anyway in fact, several months ago, there was a digital camera shoot done at AMPAS (the imagery of which at the time of this posting has not been publicly presented) in which 20 stops of latitude were recorded using two Sony F65s co-centered in a 3D rig. set 6 stops apart using ND filters. 20 f-stops of dynamic range (21 steps), and a commercial tool to test for - ![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Teazle (01-20-2015) |
![]() |
#4522 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
^ I should add that the 13-14 stops is applicable to thee modern Sony and Arri cameras but I believe the newest gen Reds claim a couple more stops. Also, although, at first glance, the 16 f-stop latitude of film sounds unequivocally to be superior to digital acquisition, fact is, modern digital cameras are no slouch because they are more sensitive to shadow detail in low lighting situations compared to the highest rated ISO film,plus,
the digital cameras are better at recording colors at the bottom end of the scale (low lighting situations like at night) because film just doesn’t saturate in color as well as premiere digital cameras in dark environments. Digital cameras see colors at every level. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4523 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
https://tech.ebu.ch/Jahia/site/tech/...01E91F4.jahia1 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4524 |
Power Member
|
![]()
Hey Penton. I watched Lucy a few nights ago and was VERY impressed with the resolution of the Blu-ray transfer. Spectacular video quality. Of course I looked on IMDB to see what camera/s were used for the filming and noticed they used just about every top digital camera on the market including the Alexa, F65 and latest Red offering. Was this like a test case for cameras? Seems odd to use all of them for the same production unless there was some experimentation going on. Have any insight on this?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4528 |
Power Member
|
![]()
I like the changing aspect Malarkey, especially with bigger action sequences. I've even ripped left eye copies of recent movies that only had the shifting aspect ratio with 3D presentations so I could have them in 2D with the shifting aspect.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4529 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4530 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
This was a test case for cameras as well as testing the boundaries of the creative palette….
Quote:
Plus, offbeat frame rates like 42 and 38fps were experimented with in order to determine what was the highest threshold as to what still appeared *cinematic*. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4531 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
Kris, you’re still from the Seattle area, right?
I really hope the Seahawks win the Super Bowl because I don’t admire the concerted efforts of the Patriots’ staff to play just barely within the rules (http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl/stor...brady-cheating ), rules of which are wanting in the first place and should be changed by the NFL… and sometimes New England breaks the rules (first Spygate in 2007 - http://nypost.com/2014/10/12/they-ar...tarted-it-all/ )… and now evidence of deflating footballs ![]() Sorry for the diversion, but it’s been the topic around the water cooler all morning long and I had to get it off my chest. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Kris Deering (01-23-2015), reanimator (01-22-2015) |
![]() |
#4532 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
Beginning after the Super Bowl is the new season of The Blacklist (which is shot in 4K on the Sony F55 and ultimately finished in 4K, i.e. the 4K conform is done directly from the 4K raw camera files). What is interesting in terms of logistics is that even though the series is not a ‘local’ show (meaning it is shot in New York but the editorial and color grading is done in L.A.), the dailies lab in L.A. receives the HD proxy files by midnight of the same day of shooting (via internet - http://asperasoft.com/company/why-aspera/ ) and the 4K files (on AXS cards) are shipped on a plane to L.A. the next day.
A few more specifics as to the workflow to come later as we approach the BIG game. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4533 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
Someone please advise me step-by-step as to how to delete individual PMs without emptying the whole dang inbox as I’m like 99% filled up
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4536 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread...n#post10275857
Pertaining to ^ #5 (eyestrain), regardless of it being HDR or SDR (standard dynamic range) induced, a new report just released this month from New Vision would be of interest not only to professionals (colorists) but also any heavy users of digital devices who are displaying symptoms. Solutions are described to prevent/alleviate the eyestrain, including a no-cost one…‘the 20-20-20 break’… http://www.thevisioncouncil.org/site...Report2014.pdf |
![]() |
![]() |
#4537 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
It should be interesting to see how the yet to be presented specs or guidelines of ‘the UHD Alliance’ compare to the specs of Ultra HD Blu-ray of the BDA.
Also how the business partnerships between the various TV manufacturers and content providers (e.g. Samsung – Dolby Vision vs. L.G. – Netflix) become aligned with regards to their HDR offerings…http://www.businessinsider.com/netfl...ands-on-2015-1 On the HDR note, finally, it’s gratifying to read some consumer press acknowledgement of the BDA’s use of the open standard ST 2084, since I highly doubt that any consumer forum, nor website A/V blogger/writer types outside Blu-ray.com even recognized its significance when first brought to readers’ attention as a hint ![]() Of course, maybe they could have been distracted by Marilyn in the YouTube video. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4538 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
The HD proxy can be utilized if the 4K footage has discrepancy issues, is misplaced, etc.... issues of which have happened a couple times with The Blacklist. So, an HD uprez has had to be substituted for the 4K footage, albeit rarely. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4539 |
Senior Member
Oct 2007
|
![]()
I was reading up on the MPEG plan for adding a new HDR/WCG profile and I noticed three things about it. The first is that the profile won't be finished until 2017. The second is that the test videos might not even include wide color gamut video which indicates that this is mostly about improving HDR. The third is that they are only making it a 10-bit profile which is noticeable since one of the easiest way to improve HDR is to go to 12-bit video. They might change their plans going forward but currently the profile sounds like it is going to be made for low bit rate video streaming.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4540 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
Well that’s ^ a bummer.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|