|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $45.00 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $27.95 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $82.99 | ![]() $22.49 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.95 1 day ago
| ![]() $27.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $23.60 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $99.99 |
|
View Poll Results: Should i make this a 4K DI only thread or continue the way it is ? | |||
Only 4K DI |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 28.57% |
Continue the way it is |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
25 | 71.43% |
Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1181 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1182 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
It was more of a rhetorical question
![]() To go back to my rhetorical question, I've got the Aliens BD on in the background for the umpteenth time and it looks so utterly incredible (not just for Aliens, but Blu-ray in general) that if 4K BD *is* a substantial improvement then I may end up spontaneously combusting with joy. |
![]() |
![]() |
#1183 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1184 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
IMO the colour's fine as the movie was lit with a shit-ton of practical lights including a lot of fluorescents so the greeny tinge is perfectly appropriate (if not what a full unfiltered fluorescent would look like), and the grain looks wonderfully naturalistic to me. I hate to go all nagysaudio on people but it really is one of the very best Blu-rays out there.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1185 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
Would I be happy if the Star Trek movies or the Italian job looked that way? Yes but it's not what was shot. Last edited by dvdmike; 12-31-2014 at 11:46 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1186 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
Well, I've shared similar sentiments in the TGTBATU thread and got told by a couple of folks that I'm a plonker (in the politest way possible) for daring to question such things from the comfort of my armchair, so I appreciate where you're coming from. But this is a movie where I'd actually expect to see this style of colour timing, and the colour is much more nuanced than people give it credit for, the movie isn't just plastered with the teal grade.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1187 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
But is very pleasing |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1190 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1191 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1192 |
Special Member
Dec 2012
|
![]()
Its very possible that Commando become a new scan for the directors Cut Blu-ray. I can not imagine tha Fox use the old transfer and cut only the unrated footage in it.
Fox did 2010 a new 4K scan for the UHE of Predator. Sadly they ruined the scan with DNR and contrast boost. So I hope of an re-remastered edition. It loooks like Universals Breakfast Club, Apollo 13 and Spartacus becoming new transfers: https://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=15732 http://i.imgur.com/rTaN5gw.png I hope they brings new Blu-rays with this transferss. Further I hope they make a new 2D Blu-ray for Jurassic Park with the new 4K transfer and sound mix, they did for the 3D disc. |
![]() |
![]() |
#1193 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
I'm in a debate with someone about the transfer for the 35th anniversary of Halloween. Can someone please let me know if it's a 4K transfer or not? It's not listed on here and I didn't think that it was, but it was said in the beginning that the transfer would come from a 4K scan but it was never confirmed that it would be used for the blu-ray transfer. Anyone with knowledge about it chime in please, thanks.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1194 | |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1195 | |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.caps-a-holic.com/hd_vergl...d_multiID=1319 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1196 |
Special Member
Dec 2012
|
![]()
@HeavyHitter, in the text stands world premiere restoration, so it must be an all new transfer.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1197 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
I am so not buying that Predator was 4k |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Tech-UK (01-01-2015) |
![]() |
#1198 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
I doubt that the UHE came from a 4K scan.
No engineer would butcher a 4K master like that. When you perform a 4K scan, the cost of doing so is high, the whole point is to preserve grain structure and detail. Applying DNR to the level of which they did, pretty much rendered a 4K scan useless, unless they are going to release it properly on Blu-ray and 4K Blu-ray, in the future. |
![]() |
![]() |
#1199 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1200 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
Exactly.
A lot of what you see in the 2008 release is noise and artifacting, but I still believe it to be more filmic than the UHE. From looking at current Blu-ray's from 4K scans, I would love to see what Predator and even Commando look like, given 4K scans and untouched transfers. Both are grainy films and would benefit greatly. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|