As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
The Mask 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.00
 
Airport: The Complete Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$67.11
1 day ago
Outland 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.32
 
U-571 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.99
1 day ago
Shin Godzilla 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.96
 
Hard Boiled 4K (Blu-ray)
$49.99
 
Happy Gilmore 4K (Blu-ray)
$22.49
 
In the Mouth of Madness 4K (Blu-ray)
$36.69
 
Halloween III: Season of the Witch 4K (Blu-ray)
$14.37
1 day ago
Corpse Bride 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
 
The Sound of Music 4K (Blu-ray)
$37.99
 
Dogtooth 4K (Blu-ray)
$22.49
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Insider Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-26-2008, 01:31 AM   #1261
dakota81 dakota81 is offline
Expert Member
 
Apr 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by coolmilo View Post
Which is better, to make $5 profit per unit on selling 10,000 copies of a Blu-ray movie or to make $2 profit per unit on selling 10,000,000 copies?
That's too exaggerated an example. A difference of $3 will not increase sales 1000%. The BOGO sales last fall dropped prices by $10-$15 per unit, and we're still not even close to a 1m seller. A more accurate example might be a $10 drop in price, to generate a 20% increase in sales.
 
Old 03-26-2008, 02:27 AM   #1262
Nick Graham Nick Graham is offline
Senior Member
 
Nick Graham's Avatar
 
May 2007
5
345
1
1
Default

I think a big problem (and this is not meant to be a shot at Bill) is that Fox has always kept a good relationship with many of the prominent AV websites, which makes it more uncomfortable than it normally would be for those sites to take Fox to task for their pricing. I'd like to see a lot of the prominent sites out their work together on a respectful but outspoken campaign on this. It's not like it's doing anything other than hindering Blu-Ray adoption, which is our primary cause now that the format war is over.
 
Old 03-26-2008, 02:43 AM   #1263
marine92104 marine92104 is offline
Expert Member
 
marine92104's Avatar
 
Oct 2006
1
1
9
43
Default

Bill can you find out from Fox how long it is going to take to get a replacement copy of Die Hard 2.

It won't play the DTS-HD MA soundtrack. I contacted them by email a couple of months ago on their site as they suggested but it just said I was added to their list with no information on how long it is going to take to get a corrected copy.

It is listed on their website as having a defective DTS-HD MA soundtrack.

I have tried contacting them since then but no one seems to know how or when this will be replaced.

Thanks.
 
Old 03-26-2008, 04:33 AM   #1264
pro-bassoonist pro-bassoonist is offline
Blu-ray reviewer
 
pro-bassoonist's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
X
47
-
-
-
31
23
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1974 View Post
So you're stating with your "grateful" comment that Blu-ray is not ready to go mass market quite yet? SD DVD didn't take off until such high pricing came down.
Actually, SDVD started moving towards mass market mode precisely when DVD players reached 349-399$ and Fox was pricing their discs at 29.99$ (to be exact 349$ was a price point which occurred before Paramount and Fox, the two most expensive distribs, adjusted their software tags to 29.99$). The last title, as far as I can recall, Fox produced at the 34.99 price point was Brokedown Palace...the Fight Club SE release was when Fox became a notable force on the market.

I don't recall what was the "breaking point" for Paramount, as they kept the 34.99$ price tag longer than Fox did, but I believe it was in and around Event Horizon, the-non SE.

With this being said, given that there are two distribs that are yet to enter the market to balance pricing out I very much believe that BR is progressing just as well if not better than SDVD.

Ciao,
Pro-B
 
Old 03-26-2008, 05:17 AM   #1265
bajor27 bajor27 is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
bajor27's Avatar
 
Nov 2007
BC, Canada
1031
2
5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist View Post
With this being said, given that there are two distribs that are yet to enter the market to balance pricing out
This is a great point, and one I hadn't really thought of. It's hard to say where Universal will price their Blus (and to a lesser extent where Paramount will price theirs). Fox may be forced to finally lower their MSRPs once they have more competition.

Fox titles already fall behind Disney on my purchase priority simply because of price, but I still manage to pick them up eventually because releases aren't in huge amounts so I usually have time to catch up, but if Paramount and Uni were to enter the equation and both were priced below Fox, than it would be harder and harder for me to keep up with the Fox titles.

I imagine I'm not alone in this as it's hard to justify only buying 6 Fox titles, when you could be buying at least 7 titles from other studios for the same total price.

I know I mentioned this in another forum, but I wouldn't have even bought I am Legend if it were a Fox title. Only reason I bought it was because of it's low price.
 
Old 03-26-2008, 11:32 AM   #1266
garytma garytma is offline
Member
 
Aug 2007
Default

Hi Bill,

First off, I wanted to add my voice, to all those who have stated their appreciation for your contributions to this site. And for my money, I must say that the Digital Bits weighed heavily, in my decision to take the Blu-ray plunge last summer. And that was a decision that I am glad I made!

I have followed your writing since your time with Widescreen Review. I've long been a fan of that magazine, but have been surprised to see that Gary Reber, and other writers for WSR, seemed to have been advocates of HD-DVD, from the get go. And even now, though fully acknowledging Blu-ray's win of the HD disc format war, seem to be saddened by that fact.

Goodness, is WSR partially owned by Microsoft? And is the magazine's hiring of Amir Maiidimehr, as a columnist, perhaps some kind of telling action on WSR's part?

I guess I have been surprised by the tone of the last year of WSR issues, that have seemed to take a certain side, in the format war, favoring HD-DVD. In the past, WSR has always appeared to stand for fair reporting, and insisting on presenting a stand that underlined their notion that home theater should be the "best that it can be".

Perhaps it is my imagination that the reporting, on this format war, has been slightly to one side. At any rate I will continue, for now, to be a loyal reader of Widescreen Review.
 
Old 03-26-2008, 01:08 PM   #1267
milou6 milou6 is offline
Active Member
 
milou6's Avatar
 
Mar 2007
Ohio
Default

After the holidays when BD has reached a lot more homes, market forces will drive prices down. The first drop will be that studios will have to compete with each other on MSRP pricing for J6P who shops at BB and CC: why pick up a movie you want for $39 if next to it is another movie you want for $29?

In the meantime we are still early adopters. Personally I am renting BD via netflix for most of my content and waiting for prices to improve before growing my measly collection.

Incidentally, I am an example of someone who spent $3k on a set but doesn't want to shell out big bucks for BDs. But I will pay a lot for a movie I truly love, and if Batman: The Movie were one of those I would buy it (through Amazon).

So *if* I'm right, or at least in the right ballpark, we only have to wait out the holidays for prices to become more reasonable as we at least reach pricing parity among studio offerings.

Sorry Bill for taking up space on your thread -- your time here (and The Bits) is much appreciated.

Last edited by milou6; 03-26-2008 at 01:12 PM. Reason: clarity
 
Old 03-26-2008, 06:38 PM   #1268
TheRealBob TheRealBob is offline
Expert Member
 
Dec 2007
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slec View Post
The beauty of a free market is, if you think its too expensive....don't buy it. If you want to send a message, that's how you do it...

Not to get off of blu-ray discussion, but Bill, do you think there is a situation that would make the networks rethink their approach to television shows? Your point about them chasing the next great reality show and that X-Files would never last today are spot on! It's just a sad affair at the moment and many, many people don't like it (and following my point above, are turning off network tv and going elsewhere)
That's the beauty of the free market. If you want to send a message, don't watch it.

(Sorry, Slec, I couldn't resist.)
 
Old 03-26-2008, 06:47 PM   #1269
TheRealBob TheRealBob is offline
Expert Member
 
Dec 2007
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaViD Boulet View Post
Not exactly. Fox is charging prices on some of their catalog BDs that we *never* saw with DVD even in its early days. That's not criticizing one studio for charging slightly more than another, that's basically asking why Fox is charching laserdisc-price-levels for a product when DVD never commanded such high prices at any point during its life cycle.
I have to disagree with that one, as the Criterion collection DVDs were $60 or $70 in the early days of DVD. That's how much I paid for This Is Spinal Tap on DVD in 1998 (although it's going for $140 now, so that was apparently a good investment).

There's also inflation. DVDs were typically $25 - $30 during the first few years, which is $32.18 to $38.62 in 2007 dollars.
 
Old 03-26-2008, 06:50 PM   #1270
TheRealBob TheRealBob is offline
Expert Member
 
Dec 2007
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WickyWoo View Post
Fox charged $34.95 for all their discs (with inflation, that's basically $39.99) for about the first 2 years of DVD.
$34.95 in 1998 dollars is $44.99 in 2007 dollars.

Source: http://www.westegg.com/inflation/

So it's actually lower in real dollars.

Last edited by TheRealBob; 03-26-2008 at 06:59 PM. Reason: Corrected URL.
 
Old 03-26-2008, 07:09 PM   #1271
WickyWoo WickyWoo is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
May 2007
2
Default

Quote:
have to disagree with that one, as the Criterion collection DVDs were $60 or $70 in the early days of DVD.
Maybe that's what you were paying for the OOP ones. $39.99 was typical, $49.99 for Armageddon (2-disc when that was a new thing), and i think Brazil was $69.99 (3 discs, tons of extras)
 
Old 03-26-2008, 11:51 PM   #1272
Penton-Man Penton-Man is offline
Retired Hollywood Insider
 
Penton-Man's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garytma View Post
Hi Bill,

First off, I wanted to add my voice, to all those who have stated their appreciation for your contributions to this site. And for my money, I must say that the Digital Bits weighed heavily, in my decision to take the Blu-ray plunge last summer. And that was a decision that I am glad I made!

I have followed your writing since your time with Widescreen Review. I've long been a fan of that magazine, but have been surprised to see that Gary Reber, and other writers for WSR, seemed to have been advocates of HD-DVD, from the get go. And even now, though fully acknowledging Blu-ray's win of the HD disc format war, seem to be saddened by that fact.

Goodness, is WSR partially owned by Microsoft? And is the magazine's hiring of Amir Maiidimehr, as a columnist, perhaps some kind of telling action on WSR's part?

I guess I have been surprised by the tone of the last year of WSR issues, that have seemed to take a certain side, in the format war, favoring HD-DVD. In the past, WSR has always appeared to stand for fair reporting, and insisting on presenting a stand that underlined their notion that home theater should be the "best that it can be".

Perhaps it is my imagination that the reporting, on this format war, has been slightly to one side. At any rate I will continue, for now, to be a loyal reader of Widescreen Review.
I’ll take this one for Bill as he’s answered some for me on my thread…..plus I’m always a glass half full person anyway

I feel that WSR got themselves a Grade A-1 spin-miester (as we all know from past history) so this is good……meaning –
Gary, in case there is further reluctance on Greg Rogers or Bill Cushman’s part to *evaluate* speakers, I think that WSR has just found themselves the perfect man for the job…..Amir should make a lot of manufacturers very happy if he takes up speaker duties as a “contributing” editor.

And Amir, I hope that you are truly enjoying your *retirement* status, as I’ll inform you that some of the smartest and the sagest MS employees (considered by you yourself as well as forum readers) are happy they no longer have to worry about being thoroughly *reprimanded* by you for buying future Blu-ray players like they did when they bought the PS3 and you were still at the software company…..which was their own personal business over which you had no authority.

P.S.
In regards to your query about Gary, he’s been described as an “agenda-driven moderator* in the past anyway, so this is nothing new…………………

http://www.audioholics.com/news/on-l...sound-standard
 
Old 03-27-2008, 12:01 AM   #1273
dialog_gvf dialog_gvf is offline
Moderator
 
dialog_gvf's Avatar
 
Nov 2006
Toronto
320
Default

A different moderator Gary.
 
Old 03-27-2008, 03:34 AM   #1274
PaulGo PaulGo is offline
Power Member
 
PaulGo's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
North Potomac, MD
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Penton-Man View Post

And Amir, I hope that you are truly enjoying your *retirement* status, as I’ll inform you that some of the smartest and the sagest MS employees (considered by you yourself as well as forum readers) are happy they no longer have to worry about being thoroughly *reprimanded* by you for buying future Blu-ray players like they did when they bought the PS3 and you were still at the software company…..which was their own personal business over which you had no authority.
That is totally off the wall! From my disputes with Amir on the AVS forum I knew he had some problems but from what you just stated he really is a control freak (although he did state he had a PS3 for "evaluation" purposes ). I remember the You Tube video of Hitler with the subtitles of Toshiba conceding defeat - perhaps Amir could have been cast in that role - from a personality standpoint he would have been a natural!

Also in most large corporations employees give feedback and rate their supervisors, with his attitude I wonder if his employees did not contribute to his "retirement".

Last edited by PaulGo; 03-27-2008 at 03:36 AM.
 
Old 03-27-2008, 04:00 AM   #1275
thebluemax thebluemax is offline
Expert Member
 
Mar 2007
1
Default

Bill

I just bought the Pioneer Elite Pro150FD through the Digital Bits Power Buy replacing a Samsung 61" DLP. Do you feel that this was a wise decision?


Thanks
 
Old 03-27-2008, 05:12 AM   #1276
Penton-Man Penton-Man is offline
Retired Hollywood Insider
 
Penton-Man's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulGo View Post
That is totally off the wall! From my disputes with Amir on the AVS forum I knew he had some problems but from what you just stated he really is a control freak......
It’s the bomb when one has the PM’s from said employees to prove it…..if necessary.
 
Old 03-27-2008, 05:22 AM   #1277
GreenScar GreenScar is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
GreenScar's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
148
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Penton-Man View Post
It’s the bomb when one has the PM’s from said employees to prove it…..if necessary.
"With great power comes great responsibility"
 
Old 03-27-2008, 05:28 AM   #1278
Penton-Man Penton-Man is offline
Retired Hollywood Insider
 
Penton-Man's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonbird View Post
"With great power comes great responsibility"
I never draw First Blood but alas, I’m too weak to turn the other cheek.
 
Old 03-27-2008, 06:56 AM   #1279
PeterTHX PeterTHX is offline
Banned
 
PeterTHX's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
563
14
Default

I dumped WSR when it became the DTS Newsletter. I no longer wanted to suffer through articles reprinting his letter to the FCC demanding they replace DD with DTS (even though DTS had no working product at lower bitrates) and an entire article on his car with DTS sound system, and articles slamming the upcoming DVD standard and lamenting in (a diner interview with Joe Kane) on how LD was going to lose it's high-end niche status. It was no surprise to me he embraced HD DVD.
 
Old 03-27-2008, 03:45 PM   #1280
JackStraw JackStraw is offline
Senior Member
 
Nov 2007
Default

I'm going to have to post some of their quotes from their big DVD issue from the 90's. It's the one with Mars Attacks on the cover. It wound up being one lie after another after another with Gary Reber at the helm. That magazine lost it's credibility after that issue with me.
 
Closed Thread
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Insider Discussion

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Digital Bits: Bill Gates quiet on HD DVD at CES keynote presentation General Chat radagast 33 01-07-2008 05:17 PM
Digital Bits and Bill Hunt's latest 2¢ on exclusive announcements Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology Ispoke 77 01-07-2008 12:12 AM
I love Bill Hunt! Check out The Digital Bits today! Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology Jack Torrance 84 02-21-2007 04:05 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:26 AM.