|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $82.99 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.94 1 hr ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $23.60 1 hr ago
| ![]() $34.68 1 hr ago
| ![]() $28.10 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $48.44 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.54 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $39.02 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $24.96 |
![]() |
#3261 | ||
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#3263 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
As has been said every time this is brought up, it IS different in the sense that a little-used recordable format produced in limited quantities with writeable dye is not the same beast as a pressed mass-replication format. Having a few blank recordable 100GB discs lying around simply isn't the same thing as pumping out 100,000 professionally-produced platters a day.
If it's so easy to do you'd better go and tell the BDA and their replication partners because they were bricking it as of a year ago. I'm really not making this up, see the slide below. Have things changed since then? I bloody well hope so, but $17M for a commercially available 100GB line isn't just gonna fall from the sky... ![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | bruceames (08-10-2015) |
![]() |
#3264 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
In the report's own words the lack of 100GB wouldn't be a showstopper for launch, but it could end up "seriously impacting" studio publishing plans, ending up with multi-disc main features being the norm and a lack of alternate languages and bonus features. I've already said that it wouldn't really affect something with a built-in intermission like Lawrence, but what about other lengthy movies that don't have such a natural break point? It wouldn't take long for UHD BD to get a rep as the new 'flipper' format, given how fickle consumers are.
And a reduction in language options may not be seen as a big deal, but it's become increasingly important to the studios as more and more of them follow that Warners-style 'one size fits all' approach, so if they go back to having to produce specific discs for specific territories then that will keep prices high. Also, if extras are sacrificed on foreign versions to fit on the language options then that will also cause resentment towards the format in places which are already going to be a VERY hard sell on UHD BD. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3265 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
As far as language options go... to start with it will only be serious collectors that are interested in UHD Blu-ray and I think they are more likely to want to watch the movie in its original language (with subtitles if needed). It tends to be more casual viewers that watch movies with dubbing. By the time UHD Blu-ray gets more widespread adoption (if that ever happens) 100GB lines will be more readily available. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | bruceames (08-10-2015) |
![]() |
#3266 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
![]() anyway rant over roll on Ultra HD Blu-Ray ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3267 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3268 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
They should just get rid of the language options (except commentary track) and use only subs. Subtitles take up very little space. If they do put other dubs then just gimp it down to DD@640. The people that watch with dubs probably won't notice the difference anyway and even if they do it should be the price to pay for not watching the movie in its original form.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3269 |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]()
You guys are depressing me. The BDA needs to rev up a dedicated marketing machine like the UHD Alliance.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3270 | ||
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() If they have to create too many local variants of UHD discs due to not being able to fit on extra languages - and with limited replication capacity coming at a premium cost as it does for any new format, never mind something as niche as this - then foreign releases could be priced out of the market. 'Why should I care?' I can see you asking, but without the diversification that overseas markets offer then UHD BD will always be restricted to a very narrow range & amount of releases, which will affect the uptake of larger capacity lines and thus the long term survival of the format in general. It's one thing if it becomes the new Laserdisc (though regular Blu-ray already has that distinction IMO), it'd be a disaster if it becomes the next D-VHS. You're right about extras Penguin, they could bung in the regular Blu-ray, but I'm just reporting what the BDA's view on the matter is. If people in another territory (I know it's hard to care about that, but indulge me for a second here) get the feeling they've been gypped by having the movie split into two just to fit on their language(s) or any specific on-UHD-disc extras are jettisoned to make way for the languages, then it could get a very bad rep very quickly. But hey, as long our provincial mindset is catered for then it's all good! [/sarcasm] Sorry for the downers P-Man, but the more I think about it the more it's apparent that this format's on a hiding to nothing. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#3271 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
Well if the DRM leaks are true, then it won't be necessary having extra language tracks because each country will will have their own discs (or at least, groups of countries).
I wonder if it will be possible to "enhance" a disc via the Digital Bridge? (ie, download the movie from the disc to your hard drive, and then download an alternate audio/sub file to accompany it). That would really add flexibility and utility. They could even fix bad encodes that way, instead of having to send out new discs. Speaking of DRM, it's been really quiet on that front. I wonder if that's a good or bad sign? (if either). |
![]() |
![]() |
#3272 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3273 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
By 'passionate' about movies I read that as 'nerdly' (with no offence intended to anyone because I'm a goddamned super nerd), because the average consumer doesn't give a crap about OAR or original language or whatever, they want it in a form that's as easy to digest as possible. So if UHD BD is ever going to become more than a cult oddity - and thus introduce "economic viability" into things like the 100GB lines - then it'll need to be a bit broader and not so elitist IMO.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3274 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
Economic viability will have to come in the form with higher prices. You can't have low/midrange pricing with a low sales volume at the same time. One of those has to go up, and there's only so much 'up' UHD BD can go sales-wise in a declining disc market already with two entrenched formats. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3275 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
I know, I know, it's only going to be an elitist thing but that's got my DVHS Spidey Sense tingling again. Will we be seeing OOP or rare UHD pressings go for hundreds of dollars like those tapes did back in the day? If so, I'm out. I just can't afford to do that shit again.
I know I sound like a complete douche when I say this, but when I think of all those clueless rich fools who'll be buying UHD BD because it's the next big thing I'm reminded of Peter's wonderful line in the gun store in Dawn of the Dead: "The only person who could miss with this gun would be the sucker with the bread to buy it". |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | bruceames (08-10-2015) |
![]() |
#3278 |
Banned
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | I KEEL YOU (08-11-2015) |
![]() |
#3279 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
Why do I get this feeling that Bran Stoker's Dracula, The Fifth Element and Léon: The Professional will be some of the first UHD BD titles released?
![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Paul.R.S (08-12-2015) |
![]() |
#3280 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
edit: looking at the covers for the films I can't say much for them I would much rather the full space be taken up by the artwork. |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
4k blu-ray, ultra hd blu-ray |
|
|