Screenshot Comparisons 4K

[PonyoBellanote]

Originally Posted by TbeRw01

Yes, input can be SDR, HDR10, or DV.
Output can be tonemapped to SDR or in an HDR container or both.

Also work with many many inputs (like 20+)

Does it only work with backup files, or does it do screenshots with discs 'on-the-fly'?

[TbeRw01]

Originally Posted by PonyoBellanote

Does it only work with backup files, or does it do screenshots with discs 'on-the-fly'?

Only MKV rips are officially supported. It could work with the original M2TS files, but some frames might go out of sync because FFMS2(frame indexer) is not perfectly frame-accurate with that container. VC-1 isn't frame-perfect either, but HEVC/H.264 mkv should always be frame-accurate as long as you enter the correct frame delay.

[samlop10]

Originally Posted by samlop10

1080p blu-ray vs. 4K blu-ray BL vs. 4K blu-ray BL+DV FEL

VS

https://slow.pics/c/MfAilr7o


.

Quoting myself from the other thread.

[samlop10]

Originally Posted by samlop10

...

1080p Blu-ray (Paramount) vs. 4K Blu-ray BL vs. 4K Blu-ray BL + DV FEL


VS



https://slow.pics/c/59oCWnce


.

And again for this one.

[Rollo Tomassi]

Originally Posted by samlop10

Quoting myself from the other thread.

At least caps 12 and 21 definitely look "scrubbed"....
Always loved the grain/ noise in cap 21 on bluray. Can't check, if I can live with the changes and make the 4k my goto, yet, as I'm still waiting for my disc to arrive....

[samlop10]

Paramount 4K vs Turbine 4K:


VS

Originally Posted by DonaldMcDonald

It's a decent upgrade. There are some real oddities in the master, though:
https://slow.pics/c/lBRtn3Jq

(The caps here are of BL only. From other caps here, it seems like Paramount's disc relies on FEL to expand brightness.)

[Kolkusz]

John Wick: Chapter 3 – Parabellum SDR vs HDR comparison

HDR screenshots, in order to view them correctly on Windows, you must use a Chromium browser with Windows HDR enabled, and the brightness slider set to the value of 31.

[asacmurr]

Zombie Flesh Eaters (1979) - Blue Underground 4K UHD (BL/FEL) vs Arrow 4K UHD (BL)

[HeavyHitter]

Requesting caps of Raiders of the Lost Ark: KScape vs UHD BD. Thanks.

[fkid]

Criterion now has the best version for the western market and seems to match reference promo shots exactly, while CG ITA did an excellent job with a more colourful HDR grade, which some people will prefer. Here are some comparisons for anyone curious. When comparing in motion on an LG C2 OLED, I found the CG ITA HDR grade had more contrast between lights and shadows, and substantially more colour which made me think "Pixar look" or video game, while the Criterion USA SDR grade had more refined grain and detail, but with a slightly more subdued, contemplative colour palette, which seems to be the original intention. Both have their merit.

Note: HDR set is intended to be viewed on HDR displays in HDR mode, and SDR Tonemapped set is for SDR displays, both provide different perspectives.

Flow - 2024 - HDR PQ - CG ITA UHD Blu-ray vs. Criterion USA UHD Blu-ray

Flow - 2024 - SDR TM - CG ITA UHD Blu-ray vs. Criterion USA UHD Blu-ray

[Deadend45]

I have a hard time believing those that created Flow intended the sky to be flattened like it is in the Criterion screen cap:
https://slow.pics/c/P6PRgGTu?canvas-...image-fit=none

Not that I expect the Criterion Echo Chamber to ever admit something is off there if its an accurate capture. lol

[fkid]

Don't forget, that is exaggerated when you compare in HDR PQ, here is the same shot tonemapped to SDR. You can have your opinion, but the creator behind the movie recorded a commentary track for that specific release and there are promotional shots that came out before this movie was ever confirmed for physical distribution, that match the Criterion release. Like I said, CG ITA definitely made their HDR grade more colourful and did a nice job, but it's not a high probability that is the "intended" look, given the promo shots and the fact the delivery could have easily been in HDR/DV for Criterion's disc, and it wasn't. Cheers.