Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk 4K UHD 60p/3D (2016)

[Tns49]

Originally Posted by Geoff D

While I do love the extra kick of detail that a proper 4K finish will bring, it's HDR that's been the game changer for me.

Not sure which did it but the combination of a 4k (or better) source, HDR, and HFR made this truly a game changer.

[kidglov3s]

It's interesting that Soldier takes on a whole new meaning after watching this. When I hear the song on the radio I feel the sense of fear/menace from the scene in the movie.

[RockyIII]

Originally Posted by kidglov3s

It's interesting that Soldier takes on a whole new meaning after watching this. When I hear the song on the radio I feel the sense of fear/menace from the scene in the movie.

It did the same to me!
By the way, for those of you with Atmos surround sound, how about that marching band scene just before Beyonce walks up?

[shield80]

Originally Posted by JJ

No difference between bluray and 4K UHD at 2 meters?!

I've never blocked someone this fast.

Tired of people like this.

yea I'm tired of people like you, wonder what brain you have, must be air in there..block block block.

[RockyIII]

Originally Posted by shield80

yea I'm tired of people like you, wonder what brain you have, must be air in there..block block block.

Thank you for bumping this thread...I will pull the UHD out of the DVD shelf tonight and watch it again in all of its 60fps/Atmos glory

[shield80]

Originally Posted by RockyIII

Thank you for bumping this thread...I will pull the UHD out of the DVD shelf tonight and watch it again in all of its 60fps/Atmos glory

you do that.LOL

Watch your cheap home video

[alexanderg823]

i think the bad thing about this movie isn't the 60 fps...

it's that half the movie is someone looking directly in the camera in first person mode.

feels like you're playing call of duty. even without the 60 fps that would be very jarring as that kind of first person stuff with people looking directly at the camera isn't seen too often in hollywood cinema.

[shield80]

Originally Posted by alexanderg823

i think the bad thing about this movie isn't the 60 fps...

it's that half the movie is someone looking directly in the camera in first person mode.

feels like you're playing call of duty. even without the 60 fps that would be very jarring as that kind of first person stuff with people looking directly at the camera isn't seen too often in hollywood cinema.

You must not say anything bad about Billy Lynns 60FPS movie, they will hang you

[RockyIII]

Originally Posted by alexanderg823

i think the bad thing about this movie isn't the 60 fps...

it's that half the movie is someone looking directly in the camera in first person mode.

feels like you're playing call of duty. even without the 60 fps that would be very jarring as that kind of first person stuff with people looking directly at the camera isn't seen too often in hollywood cinema.

I loved all of it except for the story itself. I treat it more as a reference demo to remind me of how directors have only been scratching the surface of the endless possibilities that HFR + 4K HDR can offer in the movie-making process. 24fps looks so primitive in contrast to the improvements in resolution, WCG, and HDR use we are witnessing these days

[shield80]

Originally Posted by RockyIII

I loved all of it except for the story itself. I treat it more as a reference demo to remind me of how directors have only been scratching the surface of the endless possibilities that HFR + 4K HDR can offer in the movie-making process. 24fps looks so primitive in contrast to the improvements in resolution, WCG, and HDR use we are witnessing these days

So clueless WOW

[shield80]

The BIlly Lnn was a test run, next movie he is making is a documentary 120FPS

[RockyIII]

Fun facts:
Billy Lynn won the 2016 Hollywood Film Awards for best composer and best producer of the year

[alexanderg823]

Originally Posted by RockyIII

I loved all of it except for the story itself. I treat it more as a reference demo to remind me of how directors have only been scratching the surface of the endless possibilities that HFR + 4K HDR can offer in the movie-making process. 24fps looks so primitive in contrast to the improvements in resolution, WCG, and HDR use we are witnessing these days

In order for Hollywood to move forward with 60 FPS movies, they'll need to massively step their game up on effects/sets/costumes/makeup big time. The increased temporal resolution of the almost triple framerate reveals all the corners cut to make the Hollywood magic.

Even the blockbuster budget of the hobbit movie made it look like exactly what it was - a bunch of actors playing dress up on a set.

As weird as it sounds, the 60 fps CGI cut scenes of the Last of Us on playstation 4 didn't look as jarring and bad as the hobbit did.

[shield80]

Originally Posted by RockyIII

Fun facts:
Billy Lynn won the 2016 Hollywood Film Awards for best composer and best producer of the year

LOL that piece of crap won, well that goes to show how that anybody can win he he

[RockyIII]

Originally Posted by alexanderg823

In order for Hollywood to move forward with 60 FPS movies, they'll need to massively step their game up on effects/sets/costumes/makeup big time. The increased temporal resolution of the almost triple framerate reveals all the corners cut to make the Hollywood magic.

Even the blockbuster budget of the hobbit movie made it look like exactly what it was - a bunch of actors playing dress up on a set.

As weird as it sounds, the 60 fps CGI cut scenes of the Last of Us on playstation 4 didn't look as jarring and bad as the hobbit did.

"...a bunch of actors playing dress up on a set"...
uhmmmm, that is what they are. Hobbits do not exist

[shield80]

Originally Posted by RockyIII

"...a bunch of actors playing dress up on a set"...
uhmmmm, that is what they are. Hobbits do not exist

WOW, you take anything literally, like when I said that 120FPS looks like it was shot on cheap home video, you think I meant that they used a cheap camcorder he he.

[shield80]

Originally Posted by alexanderg823

In order for Hollywood to move forward with 60 FPS movies, they'll need to massively step their game up on effects/sets/costumes/makeup big time. The increased temporal resolution of the almost triple framerate reveals all the corners cut to make the Hollywood magic.

Even the blockbuster budget of the hobbit movie made it look like exactly what it was - a bunch of actors playing dress up on a set.

As weird as it sounds, the 60 fps CGI cut scenes of the Last of Us on playstation 4 didn't look as jarring and bad as the hobbit did.

Don't mind Rocky he like it when it has SOE or looks like it is shot on home video look.

[shield80]

Originally Posted by RockyIII

"...a bunch of actors playing dress up on a set"...
uhmmmm, that is what they are. Hobbits do not exist

And there is my point I was trying to make, but you don't understand it.

A movie should not look real, like the hobbit when you see how real and you see how more fake the CGI look.

When you see that people are acting then the magic is gone.

[RockyIII]

Originally Posted by shield80

And there is my point I was trying to make, but you don't understand it.

A movie should not look real, like the hobbit when you see how real and you see how more fake the CGI look.

When you see that people are acting then the magic is gone.

I watched the Hobbit in 24p...Still looked like actors playing dress up on a movie set, only with far more blurry and juddery picture

[shield80]

Originally Posted by RockyIII

I watched the Hobbit in 24p...Still looked like actors playing dress up on a movie set, only with far more blurry and juddery picture

See clueless it amazing

I don't look half as bad in 48FPS

But you don't understand, that's ok.

higher the frame rate the more it will see like they are acting, lower frame right hides that more.