|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $49.99 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.96 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $36.69 1 day ago
| ![]() $19.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $31.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $39.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $32.99 | ![]() $38.02 1 day ago
| ![]() $37.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $32.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $32.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $30.10 9 hrs ago
|
![]() |
#701 | |
Active Member
Nov 2008
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Geoff D (05-13-2018) |
![]() |
#702 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
EDIT: obsolete - all BD caps have been fixed
I went back to "Knowing" this morning to see how bad the gimp Problem really is and it's worse than I thought ... I just redid the title shot and one of the "relevant" caps (the improvement is still there), but I'm afraid I'll "have to" revisit the BD caps of Knowing, The Post and Blade Runner. Even if no one else cares, I'm afraid that I do - just can't leave it like that ... Might do Knowing and The Post this evening and Blade Runner maybe tomorrow. Anyway, here are the two I just redid to check how bad it really is: previous UHD-BD cap, BD cap properly upscaled, original BD cap, previously effed up BD upscale (gimp 2.10): ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() As you can see, gimp 2.10 cubic scaling currently adds some serious blurring to the image ... Damn. Damn. Damn. Maybe sth similar happened at Universal with Oblivion. But like my grandma used to say: Only if you don't do anything, you will make no mistakes. Last edited by andreasy969; 05-13-2018 at 03:48 PM. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: |
![]() |
#704 | |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() Quote:
I appreciate what you're saying about these things possibly hitting the wall in terms of available space, Blade Runner especially as that should NEVER have been on a BD66, and SPR is a very long full-screen (no black bars) movie on a BD100, but Sony were producing decent-enough encodes that remain amongst the grainiest on the format on BD66 a full two years ago without these kinds of dreadful chroma artefacts. Their stuff is still free of this phenom AFAIK so whatever encoding parameters they're using I wish they'd share them with Paramount. [edit] And if this is HEVC straight up running out of steam then I'd gladly trade a bit of coherence in the luminance to give the chroma more room to groove, I'd rather have a tickle of conventional blocking than these shite chroma artefacts which also robs the chroma channels of whatever resolution they've got left. Last edited by Geoff D; 05-13-2018 at 11:06 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#705 |
Senior Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#706 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
Often noticeably sharper/more detailed with better grain. Except perhaps for the VFX, the UHD master was most likely upscaled directly from 2.8K.
BD left, UHD right ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by Pyoko; 05-13-2018 at 03:13 PM. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | andreasy969 (05-13-2018), chip75 (05-13-2018), juanbauty@yahoo.es (05-14-2018), pawel86ck (05-21-2018), Spartan21 (05-14-2018), UpsetSmiley (05-13-2018) |
![]() |
#707 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
I fixed the blurred BD upscales of all 3 now - 'Knowing' catches up a little bit again now and at the same time has its sharpening back, 'The Post' has its grain back and 'Blade Runner' regains its dignity. You may want to compare all 3 again.
Sorry for the little screw-up. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Geoff D (05-13-2018) |
![]() |
#708 | |
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | andreasy969 (05-13-2018) |
![]() |
#709 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
"2K DI"
Yeah I'm going to have to call bullshit on that one... Granted the BD isn't great and seems prone to aliasing, but that ain't to 2K grain on the UHD. I guess IMDb etc. are conflating the intermediate/working resolution with the final DCP resolution (as information on the former isn't as readily available.) BD left, UHD right ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#711 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
It would be clearer if the sentence at the end read "the mastering resolution was 2K for digital cinema." That's just the very final output though and just one of the masters. Other possible masters are SD, HD, UHD, broadcast, digital download etc. with various resolutions and specifications.
It doesn't mean the first thing they did after scanning was to downscale it to 2K and then work from that, that would be the intermediate resolution, but I guess the terminology has gotten all muddled since the term DI started being applied to everything and not just the original film workflow. The UHD is definitely no upscale from 2K. |
![]() |
![]() |
#713 | |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | andreasy969 (05-14-2018) |
![]() |
#714 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Geoff D (05-14-2018) |
![]() |
#715 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | andreasy969 (05-14-2018) |
![]() |
#717 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
![]() |
#718 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
Yeah, but since the main purpose of the comparisons are the details and the compression (only followed by stuff like highlight detail and general change of color) smoothed BD upscales are still somewhat less than perfect.
![]() ![]() Well, please just tell me then next time. ![]() The bitter irony is that for a moment, with one cap, I remember being slightly confused with the Knowing upscales myself. But I dismissed that thought and didn't check back ... Quote:
I'm usually not a fan of such lists and I'm also too lazy to enter my discs here (or elsewhere for that matter), but I just did an "UHD export" from my excel file and I own and can do the following (didn't exclude those that have comparisons somewhere already, because, again, too lazy and also not sure about some ...): [Show spoiler] I think I might/will always put new ones first, but (like I said before) for the most part, the order doesn't really matter to me. I'm not very interested in some myself though for varying reasons. Last edited by andreasy969; 05-14-2018 at 06:38 PM. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Jim Collins (05-16-2018) |
![]() |
#720 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
Marginally better compression of the grain and that's pretty much it for the 4K, not that I expected much else. I don't like the Dolby Vision presentation on my set either, as blacks are often raised to the max. I'm not talking about Nolan blacks, I'm talking about "this really looks like something is wrong" blacks.
BD left, UHD right ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|