|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $82.99 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $101.99 19 hrs ago
| ![]() $39.02 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $124.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $35.99 | ![]() $23.79 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.96 |
![]() |
#6002 | |
Senior Member
|
![]()
Just to lighten the mood a bit, it doesn't seem like Warner are worried as they are having a party on the 28th as posted at HMM
Quote:
Found it untitled.png ![]() Last edited by Ispoke; 06-27-2011 at 10:27 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6003 | |
Active Member
Jun 2011
|
![]() Quote:
Do you not see that your comparison to what happened with the Matrix is nearly the opposite of what's going on here? With the Matrix, a decision was made while making the two sequels a few years after the original film came out. Then the filmmakers decided to go back to the original and adjust the color timing to match look of the sequels when in the matrix. With LOTR, we have 3 movies that were filmed pretty much at the same time, each of which used very specific and intentional color grading during post-processing, and all 3 films blended well in terms of coloring (the issue of picture quality is a generally a separate one). Yes there were some different color choices made in specific scenes of the different movies, but as a whole they flowed together nicely in terms of their color, and that's how it stayed through the TE DVDs, the EE DVDs, and the TE Blu-Rays released about a year ago. But now, with the EE Blu-Rays, a blanket color change has been made to just the first of the three films that sets it noticeably apart from both of the other films, which remain relatively untouched from the state they've been in all these years. For this one film in the trilogy, they've adjusted the white-point to something akin to a pea green, losing some of the fine detail and removing every single trace and pixel of pure white in the entire film, utterly muting many of the rich colors in the film (compare the clothing on the hobbits between TE Blu and EE Blu), even though all the pure white has been left unmolested in the other two films. Also, for those claiming the tint is actually bluish or teal as opposed to green, I don't believe this is correct. The best spot to look for the color of the tint is in a scene that would otherwise have pure white, and the best scene for that would seem to be the fade to white just before Frodo wakes in Rivendell, which is definitely a pea green color. Even if that fade was slightly off-white, it would still mean that the blanket tint was a slightly more vibrant pea green color, not blue or teal, which, by the way, would not be much better because any blanket tint to the whole film would have a negative impact. This state of affairs just doesn't scream "intentional change" or "artistic choice". It screams "mistake". No reason that has been offered for why FOTR alone would have been subjected to this wholesale change makes even a lick of sense. Take care, HeKS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6004 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
Pea green?!?!?!? Yes, the tint has removed all pure-white from the image but... Pea green? That tint is definitely there, but it is not so extreme that white is now pea green. Do you think the snowy mountains look like moss?
I've looked at every screenshot and YouTube clip and the tint is so subtle that without a pure-white reference right in front of me, I wouldnt notice a thing. Snow appears white to me and every professional review seems And about the Matrix comparison, while they were all shot at the same time, FOTR was the first to be finished. Therefore the least amount of post production time and the least advanced software used. Another forum poster gave an excellent explanation earlier. As for why FOTR is the only one to have it's color correction changed, that might be because Peter Jackson stated that FOTR was to have it's color correction changed with it's new remaster. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6006 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6007 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
"I wonder if people are going to see white just because they have their mind so hell bent on it being there. Damn that placebo effect." ... ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6008 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6009 |
Blu-ray Count
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6010 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6013 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
We would have had "Lucas Like" arguments then. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6015 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6016 |
Special Member
|
![]()
They might. But the color timing is preceived differently in motion and many complaining have not seen the BD's and most that have say it is fine.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6017 |
Banned
|
![]()
Even though this green tint thing isnt the end of the world, Im getting tired of there always having to be "something" with these film sets that get released.
It seems that many(not all) sets end up with one or more of the following issues: - Not all versions of the films included - Content being changed - New color tints added for no reason - Lots of wasted discs with extras cramed in from previous versions - Dumb packaging - Whatever other nonsense they can come up with. Can we just simply make huge, massive box sets with ALL versions of the films in normal packaging without any tinkering? Puhleeeze? Thanks. ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6019 | |
Active Member
Jun 2010
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6020 | |
Active Member
Jun 2010
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Arrrgghh! |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|