Gemini Man 4K UHD 60fps (2019)

[BrownianMotion]

Originally Posted by notops

But they weren't. Since I have had the chance to see and evaluate both (and as soon as Jackson announced he was shooting The Hobbit that way, I was quite excited for a new format), I have made my choice.

So which frame rates do you prefer? Only 24? Or is there a range that you find acceptable?

[BrownianMotion]

Originally Posted by bradnoyes

It's safe to say that if every single movie in history was shot in HFR I would not be in this forum discussing movies right now.

Of course you wouldn't. You'd hate storytelling, character development, humor, action, drama, etc., because movies would have been shown in 60fps instead of 24fps.

That makes perfect sense.

[Noremac Mij]

Originally Posted by BrownianMotion

So which frame rates do you prefer? Only 24? Or is there a range that you find acceptable?

24 really hits the spot perfectly. There’s not much of a range to discuss. Some real intelligent individuals decided upon it. Can’t say the same for today’s filmmakers and engineers.

[kannibaliztik]

Originally Posted by BrownianMotion

So which frame rates do you prefer? Only 24? Or is there a range that you find acceptable?

24, ya know, what 99.99% of movies are.

[notops]

Originally Posted by BrownianMotion

So which frame rates do you prefer? Only 24? Or is there a range that you find acceptable?

I'm not a technician, just a movie fan. I know what I like and I know what I don't like. I don't care about the numbers, just how it looks. I don't like the way HFR looks. Deal with it or don't. Makes no difference to me

[Noremac Mij]

Originally Posted by BrownianMotion

Of course you wouldn't. You'd hate storytelling, character development, humor, action, drama, etc., because movies would have been shown in 60fps instead of 24fps.

That makes perfect sense.

Movies are visual. None of that other stuff matters that much. If it’s not aesthetically pleasing to the eye, it’s not a good movie. No exceptions.

[BrownianMotion]

Originally Posted by notops

I know what I like

Then you should be able to articulate it.

Would 25fps be acceptable do you? What about 29fps?

[notops]

Originally Posted by BrownianMotion

Then you should be able to articulate it.

Would 25fps be acceptable do you? What about 29fps?

Don't need to and don't have to. Your nonsensical questions won't change the way I feel about how the format looks

[BrownianMotion]

Originally Posted by Noremac Mij

Movies are visual. None of that other stuff matters that much. If it’s not aesthetically pleasing to the eye, it’s not a good movie. No exceptions.

Which frame rates are aesthetically pleasing to the eye, and why?

[Noremac Mij]

Originally Posted by notops

Don't need to and don't have to.

I hope you can relate to my responses to you now when you pull a BrownianMotion on me.

[BrownianMotion]

Originally Posted by notops

Don't need to and don't have to. Your nonsensical questions won't change the way I feel about how the format looks

So you have no idea why you like what you like?

[Nothing371]

Originally Posted by BrownianMotion

Then you should be able to articulate it.

Would 25fps be acceptable do you? What about 29fps?

do you honestly think that other forum posters can't smell a disingenuous argument?

[BrownianMotion]

Originally Posted by kannibaliztik

24, ya know, what 99.99% of movies are.

What makes 24 better than 18fps, 23fps, or 25fps?

[kannibaliztik]

Originally Posted by BrownianMotion

Then you should be able to articulate it.

Would 25fps be acceptable do you? What about 29fps?

Here, this says it better than I can.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EM16...ature=youtu.be

[notops]

Originally Posted by Noremac Mij

I hope you can relate to my responses to you now when you pull a BrownianMotion on me.

Awwwww... Have I gotten to you, Mij?

[BrownianMotion]

Originally Posted by Nothing371

do you honestly think that other forum posters can't smell a disingenuous argument?

I'm not sure, but I can definitely smell that you don't know what disingenuous means.

[Nothing371]

Originally Posted by BrownianMotion

I'm not sure, but I can definitely smell that you don't know what disingenuous means.

I was actually talking about all of your posts, ever.

[RockyIII]

What about incorporating both 60fps and 24fps within the same movie depending on the type of scene and atmosphere of each individual sequence? ��

[BrownianMotion]

Originally Posted by kannibaliztik

Here, this says it better than I can.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EM16...ature=youtu.be

I'm not watching 20 minutes of some obese neckbeard, but skipping to the end to see his conclusion, and unsurprisingly, his argument is that "almost every movie ever is 24fps" - which is entirely equivalent to, "that is what I am used to."

There is still not a single other argument put forth by the anti-HFR crowd other than, "I'm not used to it."

The frame rate is something that should be at the discretion of the director. I'm fine with whatever he chooses. But the anti-HFR crowd hates creative intent, evidently.

[BrownianMotion]

Originally Posted by Nothing371

I was actually talking about all of your posts, ever.

Are you looking up the word disingenuous in the dictionary? You should be. That's your homework for today.